<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Developers</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_category?p_l_id=13498&amp;categoryId=1053756" />
  <subtitle />
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Re: New Message from Timothy Redekop in Cisco Unified Application Envir</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1784823" />
    <author>
      <name>Timothy Redekop</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1784823</id>
    <updated>2009-11-19T22:20:32Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-19T22:20:32Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Thanks, that worked great!!!</summary>
    <dc:creator>Timothy Redekop</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-19T22:20:32Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>jtapi callInitiated</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1782939" />
    <author>
      <name>jolly abhi</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1782939</id>
    <updated>2009-11-19T12:11:41Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-19T12:11:41Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hey,&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;I have a jtapiCall Initiated event on which a menu pop-up on cisco ip phone series 7940, 7960etc. when ever a user lifts its cradle this menu will pop up...&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;my problem&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;when user enters number directly without lifting craddle, then call is not connecting in 7940 &amp;amp; 7960 series... wat to do....</summary>
    <dc:creator>jolly abhi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-19T12:11:41Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: New Message from Timothy Redekop in Cisco Unified Application Environme</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1781458" />
    <author>
      <name>Christopher Field</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1781458</id>
    <updated>2009-11-18T21:34:26Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:34:26Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Look in the mmsconfig.properties in the C:\Program Files\Cisco &lt;br /&gt;Systems\Unified Application Environment\MediaServer&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i had to change the settings to the below to stop the 5min drop&lt;br /&gt;Server.commandTimeoutMsecsDefault = 7200000     # general command timeout &lt;br /&gt;default &lt;br /&gt;Server.commandTimeoutMsecsConnect = 10000      # default timeout on start &lt;br /&gt;media &lt;br /&gt;Server.commandTimeoutMsecsPlay    = 7200000     # default timeout on play &lt;br /&gt;audio &lt;br /&gt;Server.commandTimeoutMsecsRecord  = 7200000      # default timeout on &lt;br /&gt;record audio &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If this isn&amp;#039;t the proper solution I wld love to know, i spent a while &lt;br /&gt;tracking this down.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Christopher Field&lt;br /&gt;Senior Applications Specialist, Converged Technology Architecture&lt;br /&gt;New York Life Insurance Company&lt;br /&gt;Office: 212.576.8699&lt;br /&gt;Mobile: 917.414.2871&lt;br /&gt;christopher_field@NewYorkLife.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cisco Developer Community Forums &amp;lt;cdicuser@developer.cisco.com&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;11/18/2009 01:49 PM&lt;br /&gt;Please respond to&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#034;cdicuser@developer.cisco.com&amp;#034; &amp;lt;cdicuser@developer.cisco.com&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#034;cdicuser@developer.cisco.com&amp;#034; &amp;lt;cdicuser@developer.cisco.com&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;cc&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Subject&lt;br /&gt;New Message from Timothy Redekop in Cisco Unified Application Environment &lt;br /&gt;(CUAE) - Developers: Call Recording Timeout&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Timothy Redekop has created a new message in the forum &amp;#034;Developers&amp;#034;:&lt;br /&gt;--------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;It seems that my call recording stops after 5 minutes.  I do not have the &lt;br /&gt;TermCondMaxTime set, so I figured that the timeout would never happen.  &lt;br /&gt;This is the event log for the media engine.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Nov 18 11:43:49.347(8) SMGR session 3 timed out: closing connection&lt;br /&gt;Nov 18 11:43:49.488(4) SMGR cancel media on session 3 op 110&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Can someone explain what is happening and why this keeps timing out &lt;br /&gt;on me?&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Thanks!&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Tim&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;--&lt;br /&gt;To respond to this post, please click the following link:&lt;br /&gt;&amp;lt;&lt;br /&gt;http://developer.cisco.com/web/cuae/forums/-/message_boards/message/1780862&lt;br /&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;or simply reply to this email.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Christopher Field</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-18T21:34:26Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Call Recording Timeout</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1780862" />
    <author>
      <name>Timothy Redekop</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1780862</id>
    <updated>2009-11-18T18:49:44Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-18T18:49:44Z</published>
    <summary type="html">It seems that my call recording stops after 5 minutes.  I do not have the TermCondMaxTime set, so I figured that the timeout would never happen.  This is the event log for the media engine.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Nov 18 11:43:49.347(8) SMGR session 3 timed out: closing connection&lt;br /&gt;Nov 18 11:43:49.488(4) SMGR cancel media on session 3 op 110&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Can someone explain what is happening and why this keeps timing out on me?&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Thanks!&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Tim&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Timothy Redekop</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-18T18:49:44Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: CUAE application installation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1779372" />
    <author>
      <name>hemant bobade</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1779372</id>
    <updated>2009-11-18T07:43:30Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-18T07:43:30Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hello Rajesh and all, &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;As you got my requirement I posted in my first post.&lt;br /&gt;Actually, for my above requirement is it necessary to have CUCM installed on m/c?. Actually, my client have CUAE installed on his machine.&lt;br /&gt;As I said, I need &lt;b&gt;Cisco Unified Communications Manager 6.0 SDK Version (Developement&lt;br /&gt;version)— For deploying an IP Phone Services, adding device etc.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But, can the same things be achieved with CUAE, so there will not be CUCM on m/c.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Any help will be greately appreciated.&lt;br /&gt;Please point me out if I am going wrong here.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Thanks and appreciate your response, &lt;br /&gt;Hemant&lt;br /&gt; </summary>
    <dc:creator>hemant bobade</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-18T07:43:30Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Incomplete Device List</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1777477" />
    <author>
      <name>SHRENIK KASTURI</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1777477</id>
    <updated>2009-11-17T16:04:28Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-17T16:04:28Z</published>
    <summary type="html">We are running version 2.4.3. Is there a fix/workaround available for that platform?&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Shrenik</summary>
    <dc:creator>SHRENIK KASTURI</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-17T16:04:28Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Incomplete Device List</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1775967" />
    <author>
      <name>Nabhonil Sinha</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1775967</id>
    <updated>2009-11-17T04:13:47Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-17T04:13:47Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi Umesh,&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;The hotfix is 2.5.1 SR2 - HF5. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Thanks&lt;br /&gt;Nabhonil</summary>
    <dc:creator>Nabhonil Sinha</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-17T04:13:47Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Incomplete Device List</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1776048" />
    <author>
      <name>UP Chaurasia</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1776048</id>
    <updated>2009-11-17T03:36:03Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-17T03:36:03Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi David,&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;We are also facing similar issue with 2.5.1 SR2 version. Is this known bug in 2.5.1 SR2? What is the hotfix number for this so that we can open a case in developer services.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Umesh</summary>
    <dc:creator>UP Chaurasia</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-17T03:36:03Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Re: [Cuae-developers] New Message from UP Chaurasia in Cisco Unified Ap</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1776037" />
    <author>
      <name>UP Chaurasia</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1776037</id>
    <updated>2009-11-17T03:13:52Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-17T03:13:52Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi Larry,&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;I am unable to see you reply. Can you please check again?&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;Umesh</summary>
    <dc:creator>UP Chaurasia</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-17T03:13:52Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Incomplete Device List</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1775897" />
    <author>
      <name>David Staudt</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1775897</id>
    <updated>2009-11-17T02:02:40Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-17T02:02:40Z</published>
    <summary type="html">There is a known issue with identical symptoms fixed in the latest hotfix in the 2.5(1)SR2 train.  Please open a case with Cisco Developer Services to obtain this hotfix.</summary>
    <dc:creator>David Staudt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-17T02:02:40Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Incomplete Device List</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1775334" />
    <author>
      <name>SHRENIK KASTURI</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1775334</id>
    <updated>2009-11-16T21:42:09Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-16T21:42:09Z</published>
    <summary type="html">I am trying to setup the DeviceListX sync on a CUAE server version 2.4.3 with a CUCM 6.1.3 cluster. The CUAE server seems to be getting information for 90 phones out of the 12000+ registered devices on the cluster (as reported by the mysql query on the device_info table). There are no errors reported on the CUAE server. I have also verified the SNMP community string on each of the CUCM nodes in the cluster. Is there anything else that I could be missing? Where else should I be looking for possible errors?&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Shrenik</summary>
    <dc:creator>SHRENIK KASTURI</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-16T21:42:09Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: [Cuae-developers] New Message from UP Chaurasia in Cisco Unified Applic</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1774215" />
    <author>
      <name>Larry Michalewicz</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1774215</id>
    <updated>2009-11-16T14:39:49Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-16T14:39:49Z</published>
    <summary type="html">_______________________________________________&lt;br /&gt;Cuae-developers mailing list&lt;br /&gt;Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com</summary>
    <dc:creator>Larry Michalewicz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-16T14:39:49Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>MakeCall API return sucess even if DN doesn't exist</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1773932" />
    <author>
      <name>UP Chaurasia</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1773932</id>
    <updated>2009-11-16T13:03:11Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-16T13:03:11Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi,&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;I tried MakeCall API with a valid phone DN(say 1001), now I logged-in as EM User in that phone. Phone DN changed to user DN (say 2001). Now I tried MakeCall with number 1001. It return as success. Is this the behaviour of MakeCall or I am doing something wrong.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Second thing Can I get the any event for ringing phone.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;Umesh</summary>
    <dc:creator>UP Chaurasia</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-16T13:03:11Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Having Multiple 'MakeCall' actions</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1760439" />
    <author>
      <name>Kasiviswanath Rajagopalan</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1760439</id>
    <updated>2009-11-10T14:53:33Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-10T14:53:33Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Thanks Chris and Shameer&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;I noticed that even when I was having multiple event handlers, only the default MakeCall_Complete and MakeCall_Failed event handlers are getting called&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;So Now I decided to have only one Event Handler for all MakeCall actions - all those action calls lead to same event handlers</summary>
    <dc:creator>Kasiviswanath Rajagopalan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-10T14:53:33Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Sever configuration for CUAE</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1759916" />
    <author>
      <name>UP Chaurasia</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1759916</id>
    <updated>2009-11-10T10:45:09Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-10T10:45:09Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi Neha,&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Thanks for the reply. We are not deploying MCS in production system but customer always bother about the cost of the MCS server and that is a big issue.&lt;br /&gt;As per our obervation it&amp;#039;s run fine on other servers which has good standard configuration --Pentium-4 Dual Core,2 GB RAM&lt;br /&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Umesh</summary>
    <dc:creator>UP Chaurasia</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-10T10:45:09Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Sever configuration for CUAE</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1759729" />
    <author>
      <name>Neha Dar</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1759729</id>
    <updated>2009-11-10T09:31:00Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-10T09:31:00Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi Umesh,&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Please see the following document for CUAE&amp;#039;s hardware compatibility matrix:&lt;br /&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuae/2_5/english/compat/guide/hwcompat.html&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;These are the only servers we have thoroughly tested our software with, and we do recommend that you deploy CUAE on these servers.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Best of luck with your installation though. : )&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;Neha</summary>
    <dc:creator>Neha Dar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-10T09:31:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sever configuration for CUAE</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1759487" />
    <author>
      <name>UP Chaurasia</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1759487</id>
    <updated>2009-11-10T07:25:05Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-10T07:25:05Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi,&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Is it mandatory to deploy CUAE on MCS server for the production system? In our development and test environment it&amp;#039;s working fine with P4 system with 2 GB RAM.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Umesh</summary>
    <dc:creator>UP Chaurasia</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-10T07:25:05Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IVR development using CUAE</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1759476" />
    <author>
      <name>UP Chaurasia</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1759476</id>
    <updated>2009-11-10T07:17:48Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-10T07:17:48Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi,&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;We are developing IVR using CUAE. There may be 200 simultaneous call with play, record and GatherDigit feature.&lt;br /&gt;Please let me know either CUAE will be able to handle 200 simultaneous call load or not. My other option is move on to CVP.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Umesh</summary>
    <dc:creator>UP Chaurasia</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-10T07:17:48Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Installer for the CUAE application</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1759242" />
    <author>
      <name>UP Chaurasia</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1759242</id>
    <updated>2009-11-10T04:45:24Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-10T04:45:24Z</published>
    <summary type="html">CUAE keeps application related information in mce database. After deploying script using mce.exe update information into table. This is one way to update application parameters.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Umesh</summary>
    <dc:creator>UP Chaurasia</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-10T04:45:24Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: CCAE v7 install with VMWare...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1758923" />
    <author>
      <name>Larry Michalewicz</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=13498&amp;messageId=1758923</id>
    <updated>2009-11-10T00:17:43Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-10T00:17:43Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Ah, that would be CUCM.  And no, there is no way to modify it to not do the at platform checks.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class='quote'&gt;&lt;div class='quote-content'&gt;Oh...sorry...the old Call Manager...&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Larry Michalewicz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-10T00:17:43Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

