<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Exchange 2010 System Template Question.</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_recent_posts?p_l_id=" />
  <subtitle>Exchange 2010 System Template Question.</subtitle>
  <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_recent_posts?p_l_id=</id>
  <updated>2013-05-19T11:01:17Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2013-05-19T11:01:17Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Exchange 2010 System Template Question.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&amp;messageId=4960408" />
    <author>
      <name>Russ Whitear</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&amp;messageId=4960408</id>
    <updated>2012-01-05T15:19:25Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-05T15:19:25Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Great.

Thanks for the clarification Jason. 

I may have a try at modifying the system template to add the option to set IP Sticky for the RPC connections. Would make a great demonstration of the flexibility of templating.

Many thanks

Russ.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Russ Whitear</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-05T15:19:25Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Exchange 2010 System Template Question.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&amp;messageId=4955971" />
    <author>
      <name>Russ Whitear</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&amp;messageId=4955971</id>
    <updated>2012-01-04T13:07:56Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-04T13:07:56Z</published>
    <summary type="html">I'm trying to ratify an Exchange 2010 ACE configuration generated with the ANM system template against the Cisco Validated Design for load balancing Exchange 2010. 
 
ANM creates the following configuration for MAPI-RPC traffic: 
 

rserver host 192.168.11.58
  ip address 192.168.11.58
  inservice
rserver host 192.168.11.59
  ip address 192.168.11.59
  inservice
rserver host 192.168.11.60
  ip address 192.168.11.60
  inservice
 
serverfarm host msExchange02-others
  failaction purge
  predictor leastconns
  rserver 192.168.11.58
    inservice
  rserver 192.168.11.59
    inservice
  rserver 192.168.11.60
    inservice
 
class-map match-all msExchange02_other
  2 match virtual-address 192.168.10.105 any
 
policy-map type loadbalance first-match msExchange02_other-l7slb
  class class-default
    serverfarm msExchange02-others
policy-map multi-match int10
  class msExchange02_other
    loadbalance vip inservice
    loadbalance policy msExchange02_other-l7slb
    nat dynamic 1 vlan 11

 
As can be seen, no session persistence is configured by ANM. The CVD on the other hand declares that SRC-IP stickiness is required for MAPI-RPC connections in an Exchange 2010 environment. 
 
I'm looking for confirmation whether the error is with ANM or the CVD.
 
Many thanks
 
Russ.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Russ Whitear</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-04T13:07:56Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

