CSS removeMember in AXL for CUCM 9.0 doesn't work correct? http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=&threadId=11929564 2013-05-26T05:33:35Z 2013-05-26T05:33:35Z David Staudt http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=12050487 2013-02-18T16:38:43Z 2013-02-18T16:38:43Z

If you need to do more than add or remove a single route partition you can still use <members> - this works for me on my 9.0 UCM: [b]<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:ns="http://www.cisco.com/AXL/API/9.0">[/b] [b]   <soapenv:Header/>[/b] [b]   <soapenv:Body>[/b] [b]      <ns:updateCss sequence="1">[/b] [b]         <name>testCss</name>[/b] [b]               <members>[/b] [b]                  <member>[/b] [b]                     <routePartitionName>testPartitionA</routePartitionName>[/b] [b]                     <index>1</index>[/b] [b]                  </member>[/b] [b]                  <member>[/b] [b]                     <routePartitionName>testPartitionB</routePartitionName>[/b] [b]                     <index>3</index>[/b] [b]                     </member>[/b] [b]                  <member>[/b] [b]                     <routePartitionName>testPartitionC</routePartitionName>[/b] [b]                     <index>2</index>[/b] [b]                     </member>[/b] [b]               </members>[/b] [b]      </ns:updateCss>[/b] [b]   </soapenv:Body>[/b] [b]</soapenv:Envelope>[/b]  

David Staudt 2013-02-18T16:38:43Z Michael Kail http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=12036396 2013-02-18T09:18:43Z 2013-02-18T09:18:43Z

Theoretically it works. Until you want to delete another partition or add a new partition. As the series has a hole you have to check what holes are there to find the correct index for adding or removing a partition.  There is also another question: How can you change the order of the partitions? In former version there was the "member" tag (which is now replaced by removeMemebers and addMembers). But know you have to change the series with direct sql updates or delete and add requests.    

Michael Kail 2013-02-18T09:18:43Z David Staudt http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=11952119 2013-02-14T23:32:05Z 2013-02-14T23:32:05Z

I can confirm the behaviour.  Also it appears if you remove a member in the UCM admin the sort order numbers get re-ordered, so there is variance there. Theoretically, the (functional) order of the members is still correct, there's just a 'hole' in the series.  Does the possibility of a 'missing' sort order value cause a problem in  your app that you can't work around? Can you clarify your last comment re 'tag field members' not working..?

David Staudt 2013-02-14T23:32:05Z Michael Kail http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=11929563 2013-02-14T13:34:22Z 2013-02-14T13:34:22Z

Hi everybody, i am having a problem with AXL version 9.0 and CUCM 9.0 when updating the route partitions of a calling search space. Adding partitions with addMembers works fine but removing partitions with removeMember does not update sortorder in the database table CallingSearchSpaceMember. Has anybody the same experiences/problems? Just to be sure, when using removeMembers you do only add the name and the index of the route partition you want to remove? After all, the tag field members, which worked the last AXL Version doesn't work anymore :-( Thanks for your help!  

Michael Kail 2013-02-14T13:34:22Z