Enhancement requests for AXP. http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_category?p_l_id=&mbCategoryId=1366759 2013-05-20T13:46:21Z 2013-05-20T13:46:21Z ASHISH BHATTACHARJEE http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=4011400 2011-06-06T16:44:50Z 2011-06-06T16:44:46Z

Hello We would need the password for the username "sysadmin" to be encrypted.   Thanks   Ashish

ASHISH BHATTACHARJEE 2011-06-06T16:44:46Z ASHISH BHATTACHARJEE http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=4011393 2011-06-06T16:43:09Z 2011-06-06T16:43:05Z

Hello   We would need TACACS (client support) feature for the AXP blades.   Thanks   Ashish

ASHISH BHATTACHARJEE 2011-06-06T16:43:05Z Anusha Kannappan http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=2765324 2010-11-22T12:54:08Z 2010-11-22T12:54:08Z

Hi Pablo,   I  think you have posted your query in the right forum now. As it is not related to AXP this thread will be removed from this technical center shortly.   Thanks, Anusha

Anusha Kannappan 2010-11-22T12:54:08Z Pablo Gomez http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=2757929 2010-11-19T20:59:09Z 2010-11-19T20:59:09Z

Dear Anusha,   Thanks for your answer. I have re-posted the trhead into Developers category. This is the new link: [url=http://developer.cisco.com/web/cuae/forums/-/message_boards/message/2757890]http://developer.cisco.com/web/cuae/forums/-/message_boards/message/2757890[/url]   Could you please tell if it is the rigth place to post this kind of questions???   Regards, Pablo

Pablo Gomez 2010-11-19T20:59:09Z Anusha Kannappan http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=2757303 2010-11-19T11:29:15Z 2010-11-19T11:29:15Z

Hi Pablo, AXP is not the correct tech center to post this question as the technology does not cover this.  Please review the page http://developer.cisco.com/web/cdc/tech for the proper tech center.  Thanks, Anusha

Anusha Kannappan 2010-11-19T11:29:15Z Pablo Gomez http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=2756513 2010-11-19T01:29:43Z 2010-11-19T01:29:02Z

Dear experts,   We are having problems with the Click to Call Addin in MS Excel.   We have developed an Excel application, that has a COM referenced that is a connection to our SAP System and when we deployed Click To Call in all machines we faced with this error message (please see attachment 1): Run-time error ¿-2147417848 (80010108)¿: Automation error The object invoked has disconnected from its clients. Since we realized about this issue, we started to do some workarounds. If Click to Call is disabled or uninstalled from the computer, our application runs properly. So we did some tests and we find out that if there is a COM registered to the VBA project in Excel, doesn'7 matter the COM complexity, both the COM and Click to Call can't work.   We have created a simple XLS file which has referenced a simple COM DLL with that only has a function that returns a string. There isn¿t another process in this DLL, no connection to SAP neither another type of process.   Into the XLS file, there is a macro that sort a column using this simple code:             ActiveWorkbook.Worksheets("Sheet1").Sort.SortFields.Add Key:=Range("G2"),   SortOn:=xlSortOnValues, Order:=xlAscending, DataOption:=xlSortNormal ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test 1- XLS file with our simple COM referenced Click to call Addin enabled When we try to run the VBA Macro, we get this error message: Run-time error ¿-2147417848 (80010108)¿: Automation error The object invoked has disconnected from its clients. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test 2- XLS file with our simple COM referenced Click to call Addin DISABLED When we try to run the VBA Macro and we don´t get any unexpected result. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  Test 3- XLS file with our simple COM NOT referenced Click to call Addin ENABLED When we try to run the VBA Macro and we don´t get any unexpected result. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   We tried those scenarios with Office 2003 and Office 2007 as well.   It seems that any COM as simple as it can be registered on the XLS file and the Click to Call Addin can¿t work together. Attached to this message you will find a ZIP file that contains: ·  XLS file ·  DLL COM (a BAT to register an unregister it)   Be aware that after registering the DLL COM you have to manually reference it into the XLS file.   The XLS file and the COM DLL are in the attachment testCCTC.zip Also attached to this form is the complete solution of our simple COM file developed in VB.NET 2003 in attachment TestCOM.zip Could you please give us a help regarding this issue???  We have already opened a ticket with Cisco Support: SR 615625005, the recomendation was to open the case here in CDN. Kindest regards, Pablo Gómez

Pablo Gomez 2010-11-19T01:29:02Z Alejandro Rico Bleda http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=2648020 2010-10-18T14:20:24Z 2010-10-18T14:20:24Z

Hello, I tried to compile a C++ application using Event API without succeed, but Carl Erhard [color=windowtext][/color]passed me a modified AxpServiceAPI.h that worked. May be you could use this header in future SDKs.   Thank you,   Alejandro Rico

Alejandro Rico Bleda 2010-10-18T14:20:24Z Alejandro Rico Bleda http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=2211137 2010-05-27T14:23:02Z 2010-05-27T14:22:31Z

I have been working with AXP for a while, and edit files on AXP during development is very common. With 1.1.7 AXPOS running "vi -T ansi" was enough, but since 1.5 AXPOS editor behavior is quite frustrating. The Developer Guide says "vi editor not behave as expected with [b]some terminals[/b]" but I have tried Hyperteminal, PuTTY, SecureCRT and the result is always the same.   Fix this issue will turn my daily work easier...

Alejandro Rico Bleda 2010-05-27T14:22:31Z Jun Zhang http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1796479 2009-11-25T09:44:33Z 2009-11-25T09:44:33Z

 The need is as the following. I use the AXP as a remote network monitoring system. I want it collect the NM data through the eth0 and I will connect the eth1 to the DMZ. So the NAT let me access the AXP from Internet. So I should use the eth1 as the default gateway interface. The topo as the following. |-------------| |   Internet   | |-------------|   | |-------------| |     FW       | |-------------|                                                   DMZ  |   |eth1 |-------------| |     AXP      | |-------------|   eth0  |  | |-------------| | Internal Net| |-------------| If it can support the default-gateway on eth1 that't great. If it can not I can only use one more router ethernet interface as the unnumbered interface for AXP to connect NAT while the GE on the AXP is not used. I think this kind of need is there in many customer environments. Can Cisco support it in the future?

Jun Zhang 2009-11-25T09:44:33Z PATRICK MCNEIL http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1543948 2009-08-13T06:01:28Z 2009-08-13T06:01:28Z

Working on the development on the platform, one thing that I think would be pretty useful would be an app store (store may be the wrong term, but it is a buzz word right now :) ).  Basically, a set of applicaitons which developers can use in a 'plug-n-play' sort of style.    In my application for example, if I could download the Apache, MySQL, and Perl applications and then use those as the base for the application programming, it would make the process much easier.   Along the same lines, if it were possible to nest applications together.  Using the above set of examples, I could make an Apache based application and call the installation of the Apache application as part of my installation script.  This would make upgrading the software on the AXP much simpler to deploy and maintain.     Patrick

PATRICK MCNEIL 2009-08-13T06:01:28Z Anurag Gurtu http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1447510 2009-06-24T05:43:20Z 2009-06-24T05:43:20Z

Thanks for your feedback. AXP team is looking into supporting a newer Kernel. We will notify you as soon as that's available.

Anurag Gurtu 2009-06-24T05:43:20Z Steve D Perkins http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1447502 2009-06-24T05:37:16Z 2009-06-24T05:37:16Z

Hello!   I have been able to get various threaded applications to run on the AXP.  For example, I have the entire LAMP stack (AXP Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) working.  It's really neat, and I have to congratulate the AXP team on making such a fabulous product.   [b]My only suggestion would be to upgrade the AXP to be able to support threads natively.[/b]  Currently to get a threaded application to work I have to copy over all the libraries from the development system and also invoke the executable via the threaded version of ld-linux.so.2.  It works, but it requires quite a bit of bookkeeping and testing.  There have also been a number of interesting gotchas.  For example, PHP requires threading, but many of its internal calls actually call regular Linux programs like 'mv' or 'stat'.  Since those programs are part of the AXP, I had to juggle the LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable inside the PHP scripts to ensure the proper set of libraries were being used.   Therefore, I'd like to propose upgrading the AXP Linux platform to a more modern version of Linux that includes the modern threading libraries.  Many of the most popular applications require threading to some degree or another, and upgrading the kernel would help support many more applications on the AXP.   Thanks, Keith Perkins AvFinity, LLC

Steve D Perkins 2009-06-24T05:37:16Z