minScreensDefinitionType/minScreens for Schedule Meeting http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=&threadId=11895349 2013-05-22T03:33:43Z 2013-05-22T03:33:43Z John Yontz http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=11904095 2013-02-13T19:30:01Z 2013-02-13T19:30:01Z

It looks like you want to use scheduled with best effort instead of guaranteed perhaps because you want to take advantage of overbooking on the resource pool?  In any case, you are correctly inferring what the proper behavior should be.  Rather than needing to calculate the number of screens for your given scheduled meeting + endpoints, you can simply provide a sufficiently large value (e.g. 100) for your minScreens value and CTX will do a minimum of that value and the calculated value for the meeting.  Doing so will guarantee that when/if the meeting happens, it will have the required capacity for all participants allocated at the beginning of the meeting. - John

John Yontz 2013-02-13T19:30:01Z Michael Nelson http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=11895348 2013-02-13T16:10:42Z 2013-02-13T16:10:42Z

Can you provide guidance on what to set the minScreensDefinitionType and minScreens fields to in a scheduleMeeting request when the meeting is best-effort but we want all the screens to be allocated when the meeting starts. Do we have to calculate the number of screens in the meeting or can we send a number that is greater than the number of screens that will be in the meeting and expect CTX to do a minimum on the that number and the number of actual screens scheduled for the meeting.

Michael Nelson 2013-02-13T16:10:42Z