Cisco Unified Application Environment Developer Forums

« Back to Etch

HTTP transport

Combination View Flat View Tree View
Threads [ Previous | Next ]
HTTP transport
Answer
9/29/08 3:15 PM
Hi,

Does current etch implementation support http transport? If not, is there any plans to provide a http transport binding in future?

Best Regards,
Suresh
Flag

Re: HTTP transport
Answer
9/30/08 9:10 PM as a reply to Suresh Kumar.
by itself, an http transport is not enough. http transporting what? perhaps you mean soap?

there is a lot of desire to have a soap transport, and we know generally that i can be done and how. but there are currently no cisco resources allocated to the problem. of course we'd love to see someone in the community pick up that ball and run with it...

scott out
Flag

Re: HTTP transport
Answer
10/1/08 9:06 AM as a reply to Suresh Kumar.
Scott Comer wrote:


by itself, an http transport is not enough. http transporting what? perhaps you mean soap?

there is a lot of desire to have a soap transport, and we know generally that i can be done and how. but there are currently no cisco resources allocated to the problem. of course we'd love to see someone in the community pick up that ball and run with it...

scott out

Hi,

Thanks for your response.

I think we are talking at two levels of abstractions. What I mean by http transport is that can we use http protocol to transfer the binary tagged data format (or even SOAP) that is currently transferred over tcp?To clarify further, the uri string currently in use in the examples use "tcp://localhost:4001", can we use http scheme (e.g. http://localhost:8080) instead?

Best Regards,
Suresh
Flag