Re: [Cuae-developers] Pointing CUAE 2.5 to Voice Recognition service on D http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_recent_posts?p_l_id= 2013-05-25T17:48:06Z 2013-05-25T17:48:06Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1104820 2009-02-11T06:42:45Z 2009-02-11T06:42:45Z

UUID is created by SIP stack in CUAE. As Rajesh said, we have no interface to correlate these 2 id's. Youngjin From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Rajesh Vargheese (rvarghee) Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 6:26 PM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] JTAPI Question: Need unique call identifierforJTAPI and external SIP client Can you give us some information about the ID that the SIP client is logging? An example log will help. Thanks, Rajesh ________________________________ From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Jan Capps (jacapps) Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 6:22 PM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: [Cuae-developers] JTAPI Question: Need unique call identifier forJTAPI and external SIP client We received this question in the IRC Channel from jbartels: I have what I hope is a quick JTAPI question Trying to find a unique call identifier that both JTAPI and an external SIP client will have goal being to be able to have JTAPI record some data about a call and then be able to correlate that to a logfile from this SIP client each is connecting to the same CUCM if it matters the JTAPI callID is yielding a 6-digit callID, the SIP client is logging some UUID/GUID any ideas? Answer from Rajesh: Unfortunately, we don't have a correlate that will tie these two calls. ----- Jan Capps Manager, Software Development CUAE Engineering, Cisco Systems (e) jacapps@cisco.com (p) 512-336-3317 _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Attachment not added (content type not allowed): "att1.html"

Youngjin Park 2009-02-11T06:42:45Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1064017 2009-02-06T21:56:00Z 2009-02-06T21:56:00Z

I would like to add one more comment on the top of my earlier email and Daniel¿s. If the license where Daniel mentioned looks OK and you still have this problem, you may have no valid HMP license. Please check the license in the license management as well as sending us media engine log in verbose mode. When you collect the media engine log, please restart media engine and execute the call before collecting the log. I need to see a beginning part of your media engine log which shows the licensed media ports. Thanks Youngjin From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Youngjin Park (youngjpa) Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 8:12 AM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com; cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] MakeCall failed with Reason: Unknown Hi, I suspect that you have no enough media resource license. Please send us your media server log in verbose mode. Thanks. Youngjin -----Original Message----- From: Tat Meng Chiam [strike]mailto:cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com[/strike] Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 01:42 AM Pacific Standard Time To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] MakeCall failed with Reason: Unknown Hi, Currently I have installed the CUAE 2.5.1 onto a PC running WinXPSP2 but yet I am encountering the same issue. here is the appserver log: 2009:02:06::17:02:39(54): Verbose: LM License check PASS: licensed: 6, running: 0. 2009:02:06::17:02:39(59): Info: script1-9 Starting script '83a5684f-4b6c-4867-8052-0cd0ba72dde4' (i=0) 2009:02:06::17:02:39(60): Verbose: script1-9 Executing action 'Metreos.CallControl.MakeCall' (633136160585469230) 2009:02:06::17:02:39(60): Info: TM Loading OutboundCall state map to handle Metreos.CallControl.MakeCall action 2009:02:06::17:02:39(60): Info: TM Using cached CRG information for: MakeCall->Default 2009:02:06::17:02:39(60): Info: TM Initiating new outbound call (1000007) from '' to '1011' 2009:02:06::17:02:39(60): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:1 (Wait) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(60): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:2 (Wait) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(62): Info: TM Call '1000007' switching to state map: OutboundCall_EarlyMedia 2009:02:06::17:02:39(62): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:1 (AssumePreferredTxCodec) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(62): Info: TM Assuming preferred codec is Tx codec (1000007): G711u:20 2009:02:06::17:02:39(62): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:5 (ReserveConnection) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(62): Verbose: MCP connect message sent successfully 2009:02:06::17:02:39(62): Info: MCP Triggered 'out of RTP ports' alarm: 102.CUAE media server 'CUME' is out of G711 RTP ports..Red 2009:02:06::17:02:39(62): Verbose: MEP Sending success response (1:198) 2009:02:06::17:02:39(64): Verbose: TM Enqueuing 'success' (1000007) response from Metreos.MediaControl 2009:02:06::17:02:39(64): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:10 (ForwardActionToProvider) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(64): Verbose: TM Forwarding Metreos.CallControl.Sip.MakeCall action to provider 2009:02:06::17:02:39(64): Info: SIP Added Sip callId 1000007 stackCallId 2009:02:06::17:02:39(64): Verbose: SIP Sent MakeCall. stackCallId:1000007, to:1011, dn:10.110.220.12, deviceType:SipTrunk, from:, rxIP:10.110.220.12, rxPort:20480 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Verbose: SIP Got 0(Error) message. 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Verbose: TM Enqueuing 'success' (1000007) response from Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:15 (ForwardResponseToApp) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Verbose: script1-9 Got success response for 'Metreos.CallControl.Sip.MakeCall' (633136160585469230) 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:20 (Wait) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Verbose: SIP Field: 0(ResultCode) = 1 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Verbose: SIP Field: 1(ResultMsg) = Missing parameter MediaCaps 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Verbose: SIP Field: 2(CallId) = 1000007 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Error: SIP Call 1000007 encountered an error (0): Missing parameter MediaCaps 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Verbose: script1-9 Executing action 'Metreos.Providers.Http.SendResponse' (633136160585469234) 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Info: TM Call '1000007' switching to state map: OutboundCall_WaitTxRx 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Info: TM Enqueuing event (1000007): Metreos.CallControl.CallSetupFailed 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:1 (Wait) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Verbose: HTT Session added, GUID=83a5684f-4b6c-4867-8052-0cd0ba72dde4 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Info: TM Call '1000007' switching to state map: Error_Hangup_Media_Callback 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Verbose: script1-9 Got success response for 'Metreos.Providers.Http.SendResponse' (633136160585469234) 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Verbose: script1-9 Executing action 'Metreos.ApplicationControl.EndFunction' (633136160585469235) 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:900 (DeleteConnection) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Info: TM Deleting connection: 1000007:16777219 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Verbose: MCP disconnect message sent successfully 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Info: MCP Clearing 'out of RTP ports' alarm: 102.CUAE media server 'CUME' is out of G711 RTP ports..Red 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Verbose: MEP Sending success response (1:199) 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Verbose: TM Enqueuing 'success' (1000007) response from Metreos.MediaControl 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Info: TM Call '1000007' switching to state map: Error_Hangup_NoMedia_Callback 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:900 (HangupCall) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Info: SIP HandleTerminateCall 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Verbose: TM Enqueuing 'success' (1000007) response from Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:905 (SendMakeCallFailedToApp) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Warning: TM Outbound call attempt to '1011' failed. Reason: Unknown 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Info: MakeCall Enqueuing non-triggering event: Metreos.CallControl.MakeCall_Failed 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Info: script1-9 ****Using Function 'OnMakeCall_Failed'******************** 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Verbose: script1-9 Executing action 'Metreos.ApplicationControl.EndScript' (633136160585469254) 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Info: MakeCall Enqueuing non-triggering event: Metreos.ApplicationControl.InstanceDestruction 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:1000 (EndCall) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Info: TM Call 83a5684f-4b6c-4867-8052-0cd0ba72dde4:1000007 has ended due to normal call termination 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Verbose: TM Call '1000007' ended. State path = 1, 2, 0, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 0, 1, 0, 900, 0, 900, 905, 1000 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Info: script1-9 Script exited normally: 83a5684f-4b6c-4867-8052-0cd0ba72dde4 2009:02:06::17:02:39(70): Verbose: EPM Session ended: sid: 83a5684f-4b6c-4867-8052-0cd0ba72dde4 plugin-0: Metreos.Providers.Http plugin-1: Metreos.MediaControl plugin-2: Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(70): Verbose: PM Send script end to provider Metreos.Providers.Http: 83a5684f-4b6c-4867-8052-0cd0ba72dde4 2009:02:06::17:02:39(71): Verbose: PM Send script end to provider Metreos.MediaControl: 83a5684f-4b6c-4867-8052-0cd0ba72dde4 2009:02:06::17:02:39(71): Verbose: PM Send script end to provider Metreos.CallControl.Sip: 83a5684f-4b6c-4867-8052-0cd0ba72dde4 Thanks in advance. _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Attachment not added (content type not allowed): "att1.html"

Youngjin Park 2009-02-06T21:56:00Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1064014 2009-02-06T20:11:50Z 2009-02-06T20:11:50Z

Hi, I suspect that you have no enough media resource license. Please send us your media server log in verbose mode. Thanks. Youngjin -----Original Message----- From: Tat Meng Chiam [strike]mailto:cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com[/strike] Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 01:42 AM Pacific Standard Time To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] MakeCall failed with Reason: Unknown Hi, Currently I have installed the CUAE 2.5.1 onto a PC running WinXPSP2 but yet I am encountering the same issue. here is the appserver log: 2009:02:06::17:02:39(54): Verbose: LM License check PASS: licensed: 6, running: 0. 2009:02:06::17:02:39(59): Info: script1-9 Starting script '83a5684f-4b6c-4867-8052-0cd0ba72dde4' (i=0) 2009:02:06::17:02:39(60): Verbose: script1-9 Executing action 'Metreos.CallControl.MakeCall' (633136160585469230) 2009:02:06::17:02:39(60): Info: TM Loading OutboundCall state map to handle Metreos.CallControl.MakeCall action 2009:02:06::17:02:39(60): Info: TM Using cached CRG information for: MakeCall->Default 2009:02:06::17:02:39(60): Info: TM Initiating new outbound call (1000007) from '' to '1011' 2009:02:06::17:02:39(60): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:1 (Wait) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(60): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:2 (Wait) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(62): Info: TM Call '1000007' switching to state map: OutboundCall_EarlyMedia 2009:02:06::17:02:39(62): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:1 (AssumePreferredTxCodec) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(62): Info: TM Assuming preferred codec is Tx codec (1000007): G711u:20 2009:02:06::17:02:39(62): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:5 (ReserveConnection) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(62): Verbose: MCP connect message sent successfully 2009:02:06::17:02:39(62): Info: MCP Triggered 'out of RTP ports' alarm: 102.CUAE media server 'CUME' is out of G711 RTP ports..Red 2009:02:06::17:02:39(62): Verbose: MEP Sending success response (1:198) 2009:02:06::17:02:39(64): Verbose: TM Enqueuing 'success' (1000007) response from Metreos.MediaControl 2009:02:06::17:02:39(64): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:10 (ForwardActionToProvider) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(64): Verbose: TM Forwarding Metreos.CallControl.Sip.MakeCall action to provider 2009:02:06::17:02:39(64): Info: SIP Added Sip callId 1000007 stackCallId 2009:02:06::17:02:39(64): Verbose: SIP Sent MakeCall. stackCallId:1000007, to:1011, dn:10.110.220.12, deviceType:SipTrunk, from:, rxIP:10.110.220.12, rxPort:20480 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Verbose: SIP Got 0(Error) message. 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Verbose: TM Enqueuing 'success' (1000007) response from Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:15 (ForwardResponseToApp) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Verbose: script1-9 Got success response for 'Metreos.CallControl.Sip.MakeCall' (633136160585469230) 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:20 (Wait) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Verbose: SIP Field: 0(ResultCode) = 1 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Verbose: SIP Field: 1(ResultMsg) = Missing parameter MediaCaps 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Verbose: SIP Field: 2(CallId) = 1000007 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Error: SIP Call 1000007 encountered an error (0): Missing parameter MediaCaps 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Verbose: script1-9 Executing action 'Metreos.Providers.Http.SendResponse' (633136160585469234) 2009:02:06::17:02:39(65): Info: TM Call '1000007' switching to state map: OutboundCall_WaitTxRx 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Info: TM Enqueuing event (1000007): Metreos.CallControl.CallSetupFailed 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:1 (Wait) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Verbose: HTT Session added, GUID=83a5684f-4b6c-4867-8052-0cd0ba72dde4 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Info: TM Call '1000007' switching to state map: Error_Hangup_Media_Callback 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Verbose: script1-9 Got success response for 'Metreos.Providers.Http.SendResponse' (633136160585469234) 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Verbose: script1-9 Executing action 'Metreos.ApplicationControl.EndFunction' (633136160585469235) 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:900 (DeleteConnection) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Info: TM Deleting connection: 1000007:16777219 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Verbose: MCP disconnect message sent successfully 2009:02:06::17:02:39(67): Info: MCP Clearing 'out of RTP ports' alarm: 102.CUAE media server 'CUME' is out of G711 RTP ports..Red 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Verbose: MEP Sending success response (1:199) 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Verbose: TM Enqueuing 'success' (1000007) response from Metreos.MediaControl 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Info: TM Call '1000007' switching to state map: Error_Hangup_NoMedia_Callback 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:900 (HangupCall) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Info: SIP HandleTerminateCall 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Verbose: TM Enqueuing 'success' (1000007) response from Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:905 (SendMakeCallFailedToApp) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Warning: TM Outbound call attempt to '1011' failed. Reason: Unknown 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Info: MakeCall Enqueuing non-triggering event: Metreos.CallControl.MakeCall_Failed 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Info: script1-9 ****Using Function 'OnMakeCall_Failed'******************** 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Verbose: script1-9 Executing action 'Metreos.ApplicationControl.EndScript' (633136160585469254) 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Info: MakeCall Enqueuing non-triggering event: Metreos.ApplicationControl.InstanceDestruction 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Verbose: TM Executing state: 0cd0ba72dde4:1000007:1000 (EndCall) - Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Info: TM Call 83a5684f-4b6c-4867-8052-0cd0ba72dde4:1000007 has ended due to normal call termination 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Verbose: TM Call '1000007' ended. State path = 1, 2, 0, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 0, 1, 0, 900, 0, 900, 905, 1000 2009:02:06::17:02:39(68): Info: script1-9 Script exited normally: 83a5684f-4b6c-4867-8052-0cd0ba72dde4 2009:02:06::17:02:39(70): Verbose: EPM Session ended: sid: 83a5684f-4b6c-4867-8052-0cd0ba72dde4 plugin-0: Metreos.Providers.Http plugin-1: Metreos.MediaControl plugin-2: Metreos.CallControl.Sip 2009:02:06::17:02:39(70): Verbose: PM Send script end to provider Metreos.Providers.Http: 83a5684f-4b6c-4867-8052-0cd0ba72dde4 2009:02:06::17:02:39(71): Verbose: PM Send script end to provider Metreos.MediaControl: 83a5684f-4b6c-4867-8052-0cd0ba72dde4 2009:02:06::17:02:39(71): Verbose: PM Send script end to provider Metreos.CallControl.Sip: 83a5684f-4b6c-4867-8052-0cd0ba72dde4 Thanks in advance. _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Attachment not added (content type not allowed): "att1.html"

Youngjin Park 2009-02-06T20:11:50Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1064062 2009-02-04T04:28:01Z 2009-02-04T04:28:01Z

Tracy, As David mentioned, CDR is a huge file. It takes time even you itemizes data. It is not designed to access the data in real time use, but designed for billing. If you need time for placed call in real time, you need to manage it in the application. Thanks Youngjin -----Original Message----- From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of David Staudt Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 4:18 PM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] Finding Time Call Was Placed CDRs are flat files delivered to up to 3 target destinations by CM on a periodic basis (by default I think 1 minute.) As such it will be at least several minutes before the CDRs are delivered, and CDRs are not even generated until the call is completed. CDRs are not stored in any DB and cannot be obtained in bulk via AXL. If your application needs real time info on a call and devices you will need to look into using CTI - i.e. JTAPI native or via CUAE, or TAPI native. _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com

Youngjin Park 2009-02-04T04:28:01Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1064068 2009-02-03T19:36:23Z 2009-02-03T19:36:23Z

Hi Tracy, Unfortunately, we don't have API in CUAE, exposing CUCM's CDR data at this time. Thanks. Youngjin -----Original Message----- From: Tracy Laughton [strike]mailto:cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com[/strike] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 05:03 AM Pacific Standard Time To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] Finding Time Call Was Placed Hi Youngjin, Thanks for your suggestion. That sounds like it would work well. What would be the best way to pull the CDR information out of CUCM from within a CUAE Java application? I looked through the APIs but could not find what looked like the right one. Thanks again, Tracy. _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Attachment not added (content type not allowed): "att1.html"

Youngjin Park 2009-02-03T19:36:23Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1053782 2009-01-31T00:57:41Z 2009-01-31T00:57:41Z

The alternative method with Jtapi may work in some situation, but you need to keep in mind that sip device pool and monitored device pool don't collaborate with each other. Especially, SIP registration message and Jtapi status message are exchanged through totally different channels and with different protocols. So, one status doesn't guarantee the other status. If you need more reliable mechanism, you need to wait for SIP notification through web service as Rajesh mentioned. Thanks Youngjin -----Original Message----- From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Rajesh Vargheese (rvarghee) Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 11:53 AM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] Notificaiton of SIP device registration withCUCM Matt, That would be one option. I want to suggest an idea and see if it would work for you. Since the SIP device registration happens when the device comes online, we could use JTAPI to get the information when the device becomes online. For this you would need to add the devicenames to the monitored device pool. When the device becomes online, you will get in-service events from Jtapi. You can also query the device status using JTapiGetDeviceStatus. In the future (no dates available yet) we are thinking of adding SIP notifications through web services and very likely to be available in the presence server. Thanks, Rajesh -----Original Message----- From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Matt Stromske Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 11:37 AM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] Notificaiton of SIP device registration with CUCM Would I then have to poll the CiscoDeviceList every so often to detect a SIP device registration? Is there a better way? Are there plans to support SIP device registration status in the Presence Server in the future? Thanks, Matt _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com

Youngjin Park 2009-01-31T00:57:41Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1053812 2009-01-30T02:03:37Z 2009-01-30T02:03:37Z

Hi Jason, BlindTransfer works with SIP in CUAE 2.4.2 or later. Thanks Youngjin -----Original Message----- From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Jason Freitas Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 1:08 PM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: [Cuae-developers] blind transfer question Hi, Which protocols support Blind Transfer? I tried checking the Call Control Feature Matrix but it's blank Thanks Jason Freitas _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com

Youngjin Park 2009-01-30T02:03:37Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1053901 2009-01-23T20:42:39Z 2009-01-23T20:42:39Z

Hi, Did you create sip trunk in ccm? Please check if you created it and if it points to your cuae. You symptom looks your h323 gateway points to your cuae trunk. Thanks. Youngjin -----Original Message----- From: Tat Meng Chiam [strike]mailto:cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com[/strike] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 12:01 AM Pacific Standard Time To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: [Cuae-developers] MakeCall failed with Reason: Unknown Hi, I am having CUAE 2.5.0.8209 Beta3 on VPC, CUCM 5.1 on VMware and a CIPC installed on the VPC same as CUAE. Currently I am trying to do testing on the MakeCall application from the Developer Tools with having success result on the web browser but not making the call as expected. I found out there is errors in the SIP log which are: 2009 Jan 23 15:35:26.430: Info: Initializing SIP Stack 2009 Jan 23 15:35:26.430: Info: TrunkIp=192.168.1.71, TrunkPort=5060, DTMFReception=Rfc2833, LogLevel=4 2009 Jan 23 15:35:28.533: Info: There are no dual IP addresses defined for the host. Only trunk interface will be enabled. 2009 Jan 23 15:35:28.934: Verbose: WriteToIpc: Type=131 2009 Jan 23 15:35:38.868: Info: StackThread::run() spawn thread-id 0 2009 Jan 23 15:35:39.238: Info: Creating UDP transport host=192.168.1.71 port=5060 ipv4=1 2009 Jan 23 15:35:39.349: Info: The requested address is not valid in its context. This normally results from an attempt to bind to an address that is not valid for the local computer 2009 Jan 23 15:35:39.349: Error: Could not bind to [strike] V4 192.168.1.71:5060 UDP target domain=unspecified connectionId=0 [/strike] 2009 Jan 23 15:35:39.619: Error: Failed to create transport: V4 UDP 5060 on 192.168.1.71 2009 Jan 23 15:35:39.619: Info: Unhandled exception: TransportException Could not use port @ .\InternalTransport.cxx:110 2009 Jan 23 15:35:39.799: Info: The requested address is not valid in its context. This normally results from an attempt to bind to an address that is not valid for the local computer 2009 Jan 23 15:35:39.799: Error: Could not bind to [strike] V4 192.168.1.71:5060 UNKNOWN_TRANSPORT target domain=unspecified connectionId=0 [/strike] 2009 Jan 23 15:35:39.799: Error: Failed to create transport: V4 TCP 5060 on 192.168.1.71 2009 Jan 23 15:35:39.799: Info: Unhandled exception: TransportException Could not use port @ .\InternalTransport.cxx:110 2009 Jan 23 15:36:28.830: Info: Stats message 2009 Jan 23 15:36:28.830: Info: RESIP:TRANSACTION And this is the log from the AppServer: 2009:01:23::15:04:40(81): Info: HP Placing call 1000001 to: 1010@192.168.1.71 2009:01:23::15:04:42(93): Info: HP Initiated call: 1000001 = ip$localhost/3142 2009:01:23::15:04:44(49): Warning: TM Outbound call attempt to '1010' failed. Reason: Unknown I wonder how can i get this working. Thanks in advance. Regards, Chiam _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Attachment not added (content type not allowed): "att1.html"

Youngjin Park 2009-01-23T20:42:39Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1053949 2009-01-22T01:36:50Z 2009-01-22T01:36:50Z

Hi Aaron, As J.D. asked, are you using SIP? Please send us the appserver log and sip log in verbose mode if you are using SIP? Thanks Youngjin -----Original Message----- From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of J.D. Liau (jliau) Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 1:22 PM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] CUAE 2.5/C#/etch MakeCall timeout valuereturns SUCCESS....[u]always[/u] Hi Aaron: Are you using H.323 or SIP? Thanks, [list] [*] [list] [*]J.D. [/list] [/list] -----Original Message----- From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Aaron Ragheb Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 1:16 PM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: [Cuae-developers] CUAE 2.5/C#/etch MakeCall timeout value returns SUCCESS....[u]always[/u] I have a problem with MakeCall in CUAE 2.5 using the C# etch bridge. Regardless of whether or not I use server.makeCall() or server.beginMakeCall(), I always get a returnValue of "SUCCESS". If I specify a timeout (say 10 seconds)...the phone rings for 10 seconds, then stops ringing, and I get a success value! In fact, I get a callId, a conferenceId, a connectionId, etc: [list] [*][0] {MakeCallResult(returnValue=SUCCESS; [/list] callId=1000005; mmsId=1; to=7847; from=FidelusCCR; originalTo=; connectionId=16777244; conferenceId=16777225; mediaTxIP=192.168.102.18; mediaTxPort=31296; mediaTxCodec=G711u; mediaTxFramesize=30; endReason=)} cisco.uc.cuae.legacy.types.CallControl.MakeCallResult This seems identical (except for actual id values) to a call I made where I answer the call. How can I tell if a call is answered or not? Aaron _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com

Youngjin Park 2009-01-22T01:36:50Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1053985 2009-01-20T22:25:20Z 2009-01-20T22:25:20Z

RTP port is always increased by 2 and RTCP port is usually RTP port+1. Youngjin -----Original Message----- From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Rajesh Vargheese (rvarghee) Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 10:22 AM To: Tim Redekop; Shameer Abdul Rasheed -X (shabdulr - Infosys at Cisco); cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] Create/Reserve Connection problems RTCP is used for getting control information. Ex. Getting info on latency, jitter..etc (an entire rfc). Every RTP port has a RTCP port along with it. Thanks, Rajesh -----Original Message----- From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Tim Redekop Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 9:25 AM To: Shameer Abdul Rasheed -X (shabdulr - Infosys at Cisco); cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] Create/Reserve Connection problems Thanks Shameer, that is what i figured it was going to be. What is the RTCP address/port and what is it used for? Thanks Tim ________________________________ From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com on behalf of Shameer Abdul Rasheed -X (shabdulr - Infosys at Cisco) Sent: Tue 1/20/2009 12:41 AM To: Shameer Abdul Rasheed -X (shabdulr - Infosys at Cisco); cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] Create/Reserve Connection problems Hi Tim, By mistake I replied to the wrong post(I was replying to your other mail that was sent to me on this issue). In CreateConnection 'MediaRxControlIP / Port' refers to the RTCP address / port. You need to use the 'MediaRxIP' and 'MediaRxPort' instead for getting the RTP (media) IP and Port. Thanks, Shameer. -----Original Message----- From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Shameer Abdul Rasheed -X (shabdulr - Infosys at Cisco) Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 12:56 PM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] Create/Reserve Connection problems Hi Tim, I understand that you want to multicast some audio from the CUAE serve to a set of phones. Are you using a 'Play' command to play the media onto the conference? Or, can you please describe the scenario a bit more in detail? Thanks, Shameer. -----Original Message----- From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Tim Redekop Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 12:36 AM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: [Cuae-developers] Create/Reserve Connection problems I am trying to create a connection, and get the IP and Port number that is being used for this connection so I can tell the transmit phone where to transmit its Tx Audio to. Right now I have tried assigning a var to the MediaRxControlIP and MediaRxControlPort and get the flowwing error everytime Could not resolve ResultData field 'MediaRxControlIP' in action '633679534473483399' What am I doing wrong. Thanks Tim _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com

Youngjin Park 2009-01-20T22:25:20Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1053970 2009-01-20T10:23:07Z 2009-01-20T10:23:07Z

I think that you can refer to InAndOut example. It is not exactly what you are doing, but it may show you how to use conferenceId and called. Thanks Youngjin -----Original Message----- From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Matt Stromske Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 12:41 PM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: [Cuae-developers] custom make-call application Hello, I have an application triggered by Http.GotRequest. In this application, I have 'To' and 'From' fields. The 'To' field is the terminating phone (the one that answers) in the call. The 'From' phone is the originating side of the call. When I trigger this app from my browser, I want the 'From' phone to ring, which acts as an originating phone, as if you picked up a phone, got dial tone, and dialed out. When I pick up the 'From' phone, I receive the onMakeCallComplete event. When I get that event, I want to perform a 'makeCall' with the 'To' phone (the terminating side.) The ultimate goal is to have a connection between the 'To' and 'From' phone. I'm not sure how to do this. I have a connectionId from 'onMakeCallComplete'. How do I use that to connect to the 'To' phone? Thanks, Matt _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com

Youngjin Park 2009-01-20T10:23:07Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1053777 2009-01-17T04:36:09Z 2009-01-17T04:36:09Z

Hi Matt, I don't think that we have an event API notifying the change of SIP device registration status. Thanks Youngjin -----Original Message----- From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Matt Stromske Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 3:44 PM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: [Cuae-developers] Notificaiton of SIP device registration with CUCM Hello, I want my application to be notified when SIP devices register with CUCM. Would I look into the Presence server for this? Thanks, Matt _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com

Youngjin Park 2009-01-17T04:36:09Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1053889 2009-01-16T22:11:28Z 2009-01-16T22:11:28Z

Hi Tom, I am not sure what your goal is. But, if it is for NAT as the question in Yahoo group, CUAE is not prepared for ICE, TURN or STUN yet. Youngjin -----Original Message----- From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Tom Barrand Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 8:08 AM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] IP Address of Calling Phone Hi, Finding an answer to this is crucial so if anyone can advise it would be appreciated? I came across this post on the old Yahoo Group that seemed to discuss the exact same issue but doesn't seem to provide the way to work round it. [url=http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cuae-dev/message/3156]http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cuae-dev/message/3156[/url] Many thanks Tom _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com

Youngjin Park 2009-01-16T22:11:28Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1054018 2009-01-15T11:26:14Z 2009-01-15T11:26:14Z

Regan, If possible, please provide us with wireshark trace in your CIPC side along with the logs that Zafar mentioned. The logs can show a clue, but it doesn't have anything useful in case that the call signal is not reached in CUCM side for some reason. Thanks. Youngjin -----Original Message----- From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Zafar Shakeel (zshakeel) Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 5:48 PM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] CIPC softphone fastbusy Regan: No special considerations with IPC. If the IPC call is triggering the CUAE application, then the app server logs in verbose mode might help. Verify that there is not filter on your AnswerCall application to only respond to calls from certain number or devices, for example the "To" parameter set to something specific. Thanks, -Zafar -----Original Message----- From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Regan DeDiana Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:30 PM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: [Cuae-developers] CIPC softphone fastbusy Hello all, i have the AnswerCall application running on my new build of CUAE. the application works well when dialing from a physical hard attached to the same switch, however, if i use the CIPC softphone for testing the app, i receive a fast busy IE: IP Phone 1008 -> Dials -> AnswerCall Trigger 51109 -> [b]Success[/b] IPC Softphone 1009 -> Dials -> AnswerCall Trigger 51109 -> [b]Failure[/b] IPC 1009 ->Dials -> 1008 -> [b]Success[/b] all the settings appear to be consistent between the Physical IP Phone and the Softphone. the only difference, is that the softphone is not directly on the same network the CUAE/UCM servers exist. but that doesn't seem to explain the fast busy. are there any special considerations when using IPC and CUAE? thanks again, Regan _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com

Youngjin Park 2009-01-15T11:26:14Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1054040 2009-01-14T22:12:25Z 2009-01-14T22:12:25Z

Steve, This Redirect feature in SIP is supported in 2.5.1. Not in earlier than 2.5.1. Thanks Youngjin From: Youngjin Park (youngjpa) Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 10:11 AM To: Rajesh Vargheese (rvarghee); Steve Nelson (stnelson); cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: RE: [Cuae-developers] determine if call forwarded to voicemail Steve, SIP has a Redirect Information. So, you can have 3 phone numbers - From, To, and OriginalTo. In case of Forwarded call, To and OriginalTo is different number in SIP. To is the final forwarded number and OriginalTo is the original called number. Thanks Youngjin From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Rajesh Vargheese (rvarghee) Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 9:59 AM To: Steve Nelson (stnelson); cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] determine if call forwarded to voicemail Steve, As Zafar indicated, there is no clean way to determine if it has been forwarded to voicemail. But I want to suggest the closest available option and see it would fit your needs. You can know that a call had been redirected, but you would not know if it was redirected to voicemail or not. When the call is routed to voicemail, you will get a hangup event (using jtapi 3rdparty) and it has a callcontrol cause field in it. This field will indicate 'REDIRECTED'. 10:59:29.125 V JTP Got 25(Hangup) message from v6.1. 10:59:29.125 V JTP Field: 5(DeviceName) = SEP001C587A32A3 10:59:29.125 V JTP Field: 6(DeviceType) = 6 10:59:29.125 V JTP Field: 40(CallId) = bhtGNYGN7ld9dGfs 10:59:29.125 V JTP Field: 41(To) = 100028 10:59:29.125 V JTP Field: 42(From) = 100027 10:59:29.125 V JTP Field: 43(OriginalTo) = 100028 10:59:29.125 V JTP Field: 46(Cause) = NORMAL 10:59:29.125 V JTP Field: 53(CallControlCause) = REDIRECTED Thanks, Rajesh ________________________________ From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Steve Nelson (stnelson) Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 8:48 AM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: [Cuae-developers] determine if call forwarded to voicemail Is there any way to determine if a call placed using CUAE has been forwarded to a voicemail system? Thanks, Steve Nelson _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Attachment not added (content type not allowed): "att1.html"

Youngjin Park 2009-01-14T22:12:25Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1054039 2009-01-14T22:10:39Z 2009-01-14T22:10:39Z

Steve, SIP has a Redirect Information. So, you can have 3 phone numbers - From, To, and OriginalTo. In case of Forwarded call, To and OriginalTo is different number in SIP. To is the final forwarded number and OriginalTo is the original called number. Thanks Youngjin From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Rajesh Vargheese (rvarghee) Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 9:59 AM To: Steve Nelson (stnelson); cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] determine if call forwarded to voicemail Steve, As Zafar indicated, there is no clean way to determine if it has been forwarded to voicemail. But I want to suggest the closest available option and see it would fit your needs. You can know that a call had been redirected, but you would not know if it was redirected to voicemail or not. When the call is routed to voicemail, you will get a hangup event (using jtapi 3rdparty) and it has a callcontrol cause field in it. This field will indicate 'REDIRECTED'. 10:59:29.125 V JTP Got 25(Hangup) message from v6.1. 10:59:29.125 V JTP Field: 5(DeviceName) = SEP001C587A32A3 10:59:29.125 V JTP Field: 6(DeviceType) = 6 10:59:29.125 V JTP Field: 40(CallId) = bhtGNYGN7ld9dGfs 10:59:29.125 V JTP Field: 41(To) = 100028 10:59:29.125 V JTP Field: 42(From) = 100027 10:59:29.125 V JTP Field: 43(OriginalTo) = 100028 10:59:29.125 V JTP Field: 46(Cause) = NORMAL 10:59:29.125 V JTP Field: 53(CallControlCause) = REDIRECTED Thanks, Rajesh ________________________________ From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Steve Nelson (stnelson) Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 8:48 AM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: [Cuae-developers] determine if call forwarded to voicemail Is there any way to determine if a call placed using CUAE has been forwarded to a voicemail system? Thanks, Steve Nelson _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Attachment not added (content type not allowed): "att1.html"

Youngjin Park 2009-01-14T22:10:39Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1054108 2009-01-08T03:48:46Z 2009-01-08T03:48:46Z

I have not seen any problem with them on the same machine. Youngjin -----Original Message----- From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Regan DeDiana Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 3:46 PM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: [Cuae-developers] CUAE 2.5.1 co-resident with VS2005? are there any issues with installing both CUAE and VS2005 on the same server? _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com

Youngjin Park 2009-01-08T03:48:46Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1054230 2008-12-20T03:14:51Z 2008-12-20T03:14:51Z

Sou, There was a trick. I had done this a few years ago (Java 1.4 days). I am not sure whether it is still available in the current JRE days. JDK included ActiveX converter (I don't remember the name but it was in bin directory). You can have active dll which is a Java bean dll and you can load that dynamically from your Win32 app or ASP(or VB script). It was very easy and any VBscript or ASP applications can work with Java jar well. However, I don't recommend that for performance critical applications. For Performance critical applications, I used JNI. When I deployed the jar app at that time, I developed the JNI wrapper and it made Java application look native application to the customer's perspective even if it was actually Java application in the core. I hope that it is helpful. Youngjin From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Sou Vang Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 2:29 PM To: J.D. Liau (jliau); Rajesh Vargheese (rvarghee); cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] Production deployment Thanks J.D. I was just looking at that exact site. Sou From: J.D. Liau (jliau) [strike]mailto:jliau@cisco.com[/strike] Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 2:27 PM To: Sou Vang; Rajesh Vargheese (rvarghee); cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: RE: [Cuae-developers] Production deployment CUAE does not provide guideline for application deployment... Since customer can deploy the app anywhere on different OSes, this is up to developer to come up with the best practice based on customer's requirements. This is something you can consider, wrap your java app into a service and the OS should have facility for you to perform auto restart. Please see: [url=http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/doc/english/download.jsp]http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/doc/english/download.jsp[/url] ________________________________ From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Sou Vang Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 2:21 PM To: Rajesh Vargheese (rvarghee); cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] Production deployment Rajesh, I think my question might not make sense. What I'm trying to say is that does cisco provides any scripts or deployment guide to run the jar file? I can run the jar file from a command line...But in the event that the server ever rebooted. I would want the app to start up again automatically. Thanks, Sou From: Rajesh Vargheese (rvarghee) [strike]mailto:rvarghee@cisco.com[/strike] Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 1:55 PM To: Sou Vang; cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: RE: [Cuae-developers] Production deployment With Etch, one of the advantages is that you dont have to be on the CUAE box. So, you could run you applications from your own production box (non CUAE) box and connect to the CUAE box. Alternatively, you can run it on the CUAE box as well if you do not have additional boxes. You could have your own installers for your applications or even just take the jar and drop it in your production box and run it from there. Thanks, Rajesh ________________________________ From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Sou Vang Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 12:25 PM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: [Cuae-developers] Production deployment Hi all, I have been building an app in java that and I have been using eclipse to run the app but am now ready for production. How do I run the application on the production server or is there any documentation on this? Thanks, Sou _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Attachment not added (content type not allowed): "att1.html"

Youngjin Park 2008-12-20T03:14:51Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1054244 2008-12-19T03:19:06Z 2008-12-19T03:19:06Z

Aaron, We bundled SU 214 for 2.5.1GA. Thanks Youngjin -----Original Message----- From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Aaron Ragheb Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 2:59 PM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] Pointing CUAE 2.5 to Voice Recognitionservice on DIFFERENT physical server Hung, Thanks for the instructions. I see that the current downloadable HMP is release 3.0 update 232. Can you please tell me what version of HMP currently ships with Production servers of cuae 2.5? _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com

Youngjin Park 2008-12-19T03:19:06Z Youngjin Park http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1054242 2008-12-19T02:54:58Z 2008-12-19T02:54:58Z

Aaron, CUAE 2.5 is not compatible with HMP 3.0 lower than SU 210. Please make sure that HMP 3.0 SU 210 or higher should be in your system before you install CUAE 2.5 Installers. For reference, CUAE 2.4 should not use HMP 3.0 higher than SU 210. Thanks Youngjin -----Original Message----- From: cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com [strike]mailto:cuae-developers-bounces@developer.cisco.com[/strike] On Behalf Of Aaron Ragheb Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 2:48 PM To: cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com Subject: Re: [Cuae-developers] Pointing CUAE 2.5 to Voice Recognition service on DIFFERENT physical server Youngjin, The 2.4 server is running: Dialogic HMP Release 3.0 update 182 the 2.5 server is running: Intel HMP Release 3.0 update 128 (note the 182 versus the 128). I did not see this as seperate download. I await your email. Thanks!!!! _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Cuae-developers mailing list Cuae-developers@developer.cisco.com

Youngjin Park 2008-12-19T02:54:58Z