4.1 Studio - <transfer> element http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=&threadId=1057659 2013-05-24T07:29:11Z 2013-05-24T07:29:11Z Ranjana Narayan http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1057660 2008-05-16T10:40:03Z 2008-05-16T10:40:03Z

Hi Janine, CVP_Subdialog_Return in CVP 4.1(which is the equivalent of the Subdialog_Return of CVP 4.0) when used with the a) VXML 2.0 gateway adapter we have <transfer name="end_fld" bridge="true" .. dest="phone://987654"> generated b) VXML 2.1 gateway adapter we have <transfer name="end_fld" bridge="true" .. dest="tel:987654;phone-context=408"> generated. But when Subdialog_Return element in CVP4.1 is used its a <form> tag that gets generated. Cheers, Ranjana.

Ranjana Narayan 2008-05-16T10:40:03Z Janine Graves http://developer.cisco.com/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=&messageId=1057658 2008-05-05T23:47:43Z 2008-05-05T23:47:43Z

Hi, In cvp 4.1 does the subdialog_return element still create the vxml code <transfer dest="phone://987654">? rather than the newer format <transfer dest="tel://987654"> Or would it use one vs. the other based upon whether I select VXML 2.0 or 2.1? My 4.1 lic expired so I can't test this out myself. Thanks, Janine

Janine Graves 2008-05-05T23:47:43Z