Developer Network

SRE-V Forums

« Back to SRE-V Technical Questions

Trouble installing SRE-V software

Combination View

Post New Thread

Showing 61 - 73 of 73 results.

First Previous Next Last

Radhika Miriyala Posts: 174 Join Date: 8/12/10 Recent Posts	RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Answer 11/20/10 7:34 AM as a reply to Ken Romo. Mark as an Answer Submit Reply with Quote Quick Reply Ken, They are still looking into it. I will keep you posted on any new information. Can you continue with trying out SRE-v with out the PVDM in your setup? Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 9:26 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Any new status today on new IOS? Thanks in advance, Ken Thanks Ken. The information you have below is good enough. From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 2:26 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Radhika Miriyala in Service Ready Engine Virtualizatio Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I have it running with debug on and not sure what I am supposed to be looking for. Here is the command you asked me to run: boxer#sh voice dsp group slot 0 dsp 1: State: UP, firmware: 27.2.0 Max signal/voice channel: 16/16 Max credits: 240 num_of_sig_chnls_allocated: 4 Transcoding channels allocated: 0 Group: FLEX_GROUP_VOICE, complexity: FLEX Shared credits: 240, reserved credits: 0 Signaling channels allocated: 4 Voice channels allocated: 0 Credits used (rounded-up): 0 Slot: 0 Device idx: 0 PVDM Slot: 0 Dsp Type: SP2600 Ken, Can you try the following to make sure the PVDM is working as expected. A) sh voice dsp group slot 0 dsp 1: State: UP, firmware: 28.0.126 <<<< (out put would be something like this) ... <http://mce_host/html/js/editor/http://developer.cisco.com/cisco2-theme/images/emoticons/cool.gif> debug vpm dsp Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 11:12 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Radhika Miriyala in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Radhika Miriyala has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Ken, I think what you did is fine but I will check with IOs team to confirm if they want any additional tests. Appreciate your trying all the tests for us. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 11:00 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, The router seemed to work with the PVDM before configuring the sre-v, is there a particular test they would like me to try? Ken Ken, Yes the IOS team was able to reproduce it. They are working on fixing the issue. Also one quick question the IOS team wanted to know was if the have used the PVDM successfully before the using sre-v. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 9:45 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Do you know if the IOS team has been able to reproduce this yet? Thanks in advance, Ken Romo Ken, The IOS team is trying to reproduce this in their setup. I will let you know what the finding are or if we need a debug session with you (if they can¿t reproduce in their setup) Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 9:03 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Anything new here today? Thanks again, Ken Ken, Right now it looks an IOS bug but we need to reproduce this in house so we can confirm for sure. I will keep you in the loop on what we find. If it turns out to be an issue with this particular PVDM I will let you know. Appreciate all your help with this. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 9:51 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, So what is the root cause? The IOS or the PVDMS? Do I need to RMA my PVDMS? Let me know thank you. Ken Ken, Thanks for the information. We will check internally if this has been tested. I will cancel the debug session for today since we most likely have the root cause for the issue. We will try to reproduce this internally and if we need further information from you will setup a different session. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 8:49 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, The PVDMS is: PVDM3-16 V01 S/N FOC14200FNK Is this what you were looking for? Ken Ken, I am not sure if it is the PVDM that is bad but it could be a bug in the IOS image also where you have pvdm and the SRE module it could be some issue. For now can you continute to do beta for SRE-v without the PVDMS. I will check with the team and get back to you as to how to proceed. Can you let me know what PVDM models you have so we can try to reproduce this in our lab. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 3:59 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I pulled the PVDM and it is working. Does this mean the PVDM is bad? Ken Ken, Please try out the new image sent by Brett to you when you get a chance. Also one difference we noticed is that you have PVDM¿s in your setup that we don not have in our test setup. Would it be possible to remove the PVDMS temporarily and try the ping? This may help us root cause the issue. I will also schedule a WebEx for tomorrow morning 10:30 PST with the IOS developer so we can take a look if the change of IOS image and removal of PVDM¿s does not solve the issue. Please let me know if that time slot does not work for you. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 11:19 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Here you go: boxer#show vlan-switch VLAN Name Status Ports ---- -------------------------------- --------- ------------------------------- 1 default active 1002 fddi-default act/unsup 1003 token-ring-default act/unsup 1004 fddinet-default act/unsup 1005 trnet-default act/unsup VLAN Type SAID MTU Parent RingNo BridgeNo Stp BrdgMode Trans1 Trans2 ---- ----- ---------- ----- ------ ------ -------- ---- -------- ------ ------ 1 enet 100001 1500 - - - - - 1002 1003 1002 fddi 101002 1500 - - - - - 1 1003 1003 tr 101003 1500 1005 0 - - srb 1 1002 1004 fdnet 101004 1500 - - 1 ibm - 0 0 1005 trnet 101005 1500 - - 1 ibm - 0 0 boxer#sh platform mgf module Registered Module Information Code: NR - Not Registered, TM - Trust Mode, SP - Scheduling Profile BL - Buffer Level, TR - Traffic Rate, PT - Pause Threshold slot vlan type/ID TM SP BL TR PT ---- ---- ---------- ------- --- ------ ----- ---- ISM NR EHWIC-0 NR EHWIC-1 NR EHWIC-2 NR EHWIC-3 NR PVDM-0 2 PVDM/5 UP 1 low 1000 low PVDM-1 2 PVDM/5 UP 1 low 1000 low SM-1 1 Switch/3 UP 1 low 1000 high Thanks Ken. Can you also give us the output of the following. 1) show vlan-switch 2) ¿show platform mgf module¿ before the crash happens. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:50 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I will try whatever you suggest, just let me know when you have posted the new IOS. Below is my config: boxer#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 5777 bytes ! version 15.1 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname boxer ! boot-start-marker boot system flash0 c2900-universalk9-mz.SSA.151-2.19.T boot-end-marker ! ! logging buffered 51200 warnings ! no aaa new-model ! no ipv6 cef ip source-route ip cef ! ! ! ! ! ip domain name yourdomain.com multilink bundle-name authenticated ! ! ! ! ! crypto pki token default removal timeout 0 ! crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-1999750280 enrollment selfsigned subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-1999750280 revocation-check none rsakeypair TP-self-signed-1999750280 ! ! crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-1999750280 certificate self-signed 01 3082024C 308201B5 A0030201 02020101 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 04050030 31312F30 2D060355 04031326 494F532D 53656C66 2D536967 6E65642D 43657274 69666963 6174652D 31393939 37353032 3830301E 170D3130 31303230 32323335 32365A17 0D323030 31303130 30303030 305A3031 312F302D 06035504 03132649 4F532D53 656C662D 5369676E 65642D43 65727469 66696361 74652D31 39393937 35303238 3030819F 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 01050003 818D0030 81890281 81009378 2E139D79 DCA59865 14AB3398 870362B7 40BB9C13 A5DC5315 6108DF92 5E78CF06 A40D4DB5 B66D410E FAFE75AC 764997B1 5C551A47 CFA00109 520352EC 33A69E24 B3C1175B 136FC62A 8BE4637E B834059B FC7CAA6E 957DA0BB 66D8DC49 80F82890 981FFCFE 0DC7E6F9 53287989 3887C5F6 AF59D0BE B502E11E FD16F556 DBB90203 010001A3 74307230 0F060355 1D130101 FF040530 030101FF 301F0603 551D1104 18301682 14626F78 65722E79 6F757264 6F6D6169 6E2E636F 6D301F06 03551D23 04183016 80143541 7934E424 4B9A60DB E6C908C3 C20BAA17 D058301D 0603551D 0E041604 14354179 34E4244B 9A60DBE6 C908C3C2 0BAA17D0 58300D06 092A8648 86F70D01 01040500 03818100 3D222AB5 177D452F 153DCA26 1D7ECB49 58BCBF60 DA18DC04 94B82EA3 76884EBC D7131641 08687C04 6C6645DF 78B2D2F8 409BCAD7 50AF5091 B99614FD C2424D89 407A9109 BCA20473 F4CE33D4 4B126483 C240C0B9 7A628E53 E419FEC3 B8853671 03113F5E 47FA8120 9F9A7A9D 11498FE0 82C96578 8FD9770A EBD27F73 DF2E1487 quit voice-card 0 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! license udi pid CISCO2911/K9 sn FTX1422A077 hw-module pvdm 0/0 ! hw-module sm 1 ! ! ! username jack privilege 15 secret 5 $1$c5QR$fYGTbhWRKsBZ1JpNyIQGG1 username marco privilege 15 secret 5 $1$amqq$5pI0T7mUViDL5Y.NqX/yz. ! redundancy ! ! ! ! ! ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0 description To tusqa network ip address 172.17.17.130 255.255.248.0 duplex auto speed auto ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface GigabitEthernet0/2 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface SM1/0 ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/0 service-module ip address 172.17.17.129 255.255.248.0 !Application: SRE-V Running on SMV service-module ip default-gateway 172.17.17.130 service-module mgf ip address 10.62.64.1 255.255.255.0 service-module mgf ip default-gateway 10.62.64.2 ! interface SM1/1 description Internal switch interface connected to Service Module switchport mode trunk ! interface Vlan1 ip address 10.62.64.2 255.255.255.0 ! ip forward-protocol nd ! ip http server ip http access-class 23 ip http authentication local ip http secure-server ip http timeout-policy idle 60 life 86400 requests 10000 ! ip route 172.17.17.129 255.255.255.255 SM1/0 ! ! ! ! control-plane ! ! voice-port 0/0/0 ! voice-port 0/0/1 ! voice-port 0/1/0 ! voice-port 0/1/1 ! ! ! mgcp profile default ! ! ! ! ! gatekeeper shutdown ! ! banner exec ^C % Password expiration warning. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Cisco Configuration Professional (Cisco CP) is installed on this device and it provides the default username "cisco" for one-time use. If you have already used the username "cisco" to login to the router and your IOS image supports the "one-time" user option, then this username has already expired. You will not be able to login to the router with this username after you exit this session. It is strongly suggested that you create a new username with a privilege level of 15 using the following command. username <myuser> privilege 15 secret 0 <mypassword> Replace <myuser> and <mypassword> with the username and password you want to use. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ^C banner login ^C ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Cisco Configuration Professional (Cisco CP) is installed on this device. This feature requires the one-time use of the username "cisco" with the password "cisco". These default credentials have a privilege level of 15. YOU MUST USE CISCO CP or the CISCO IOS CLI TO CHANGE THESE PUBLICLY-KNOWN CREDENTIALS Here are the Cisco IOS commands. username <myuser> privilege 15 secret 0 <mypassword> no username cisco Replace <myuser> and <mypassword> with the username and password you want to use. IF YOU DO NOT CHANGE THE PUBLICLY-KNOWN CREDENTIALS, YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO LOG INTO THE DEVICE AGAIN AFTER YOU HAVE LOGGED OFF. For more information about Cisco CP please follow the instructions in the QUICK START GUIDE for your router or go to http://www.cisco.com/go/ciscocp ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ^C ! line con 0 login local line aux 0 line 67 no activation-character no exec transport preferred none transport input all transport output pad telnet rlogin lapb-ta mop udptn v120 ssh stopbits 1 flowcontrol software line vty 0 4 privilege level 15 login local transport input telnet line vty 5 15 privilege level 15 login local transport input telnet ssh ! exception data-corruption buffer truncate scheduler allocate 20000 1000 end Ken, Thanks for trying out the image for us. We are trying to reproduce this on our end but have had no luck so far. Can you please send us the output of show running-config from your router. Also we have one more image that we would like you to try it out before the debusg session would that be ok? Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:22 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I tried the new OS and still getting same IOS crash. As mentioned I will work around your schedule so let me if you were able to get someone from the IOS team to help troubleshoot today. Thanks in advance, Ken Romo Ken, I am trying to get some help from the IOS team since this a router crash. So I will setup the webex session to debug for some time Monday so we can collect all the information and try out any suggestion from them. For Now We will post a newer IOS image to the beta Site and can you give that a try to see if that will solve the issue. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 8:24 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I will work around your schedule, anytime you are available, I will make myself available. email: kromo@opentext.com Thanks in advance, Ken Romo +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Ken, Would a webex session tomorrow morning (any time between 10:00 and 1:00) work for you? Let me know the time that would work for you and also your email address so I can send you a webex invite. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 3:12 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Radhika Miriyala in Service Ready Engine Virtualizatio Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, No worries, we are trying to work this out together and I appreciate the help. s/m 1/1 is set as trunk but I went ahead and reconfigured to truank again and reloaded OS and get the same crash when I ping to the MGF interface from the SRE (I attached the errors at the bottom of this message). Ken, Sorry I just realized the mistake. I meant to say make the interface sm 1/1 as trunk. Sorry about the confusion. Please try it out. Thanks, Radhika boxer# %ALIGN-1-FATAL: Illegal access to a low address 22:02:10 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010 addr=0x14, pc=0x22765BD8z , ra=0x22765B84z , sp=0x3022FBB8 %ALIGN-1-FATAL: Illegal access to a low address 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010 addr=0x14, pc=0x22765BD8z , ra=0x22765B84z , sp=0x3022FBB8 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010: TLB (store) exception, CPU signal 10, PC = 0x22768478 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Possible software fault. Upon reccurence, please collect crashinfo, "show tech" and contact Cisco Technical Support. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z $0 : 00000000 00000000, AT : 00000000 29130000, v0 : 00000000 00000001, v1 : 00000000 0D8B8540 a0 : 00000000 00000000, a1 : 00000000 0D8B8584, a2 : 00000000 2A2F8ABC, a3 : 00000000 00000004 t0 : 00000000 00000020, t1 : 00000000 500099E1, t2 : 00000000 500081E0, t3 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFF2 t4 : 00000000 0000000E, t5 : 00000000 00000000, t6 : 00000000 0D95F890, t7 : 00000000 000001FF s0 : 00000000 00000000, s1 : 00000000 2A2FDB40, s2 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFEC, s3 : 00000000 3080C980 s4 : 00000000 0D95F89E, s5 : 00000000 2A300EE0, s6 : 00000000 00000000, s7 : 00000000 0000000E t8 : 00000000 000007FC, t9 : 00000000 2A300200, k0 : 00000000 00000000, k1 : 00000000 00000000 gp : 00000000 29133C00, sp : 00000000 3022FBB8, s8 : 00000000 00000054, ra : 00000000 22768424 EPC : 22768478, ErrorEPC : 80412AB4, SREG : 500099E3 MDLO : 87126668, MDHI : D990ADBB, BadVaddr : 00000014 CacheErr_Icache : 0x007F7F00 - 000040D8, CacheErr_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 00001FA0 TagLo_Icache : 0x00000000 - 23642303, DataLo_Icache : 0xAFBF0018 - 0D81ADDB DataHi_Icache: 0x00000000 - 00000001 TagLo_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 2277E583, TagHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0912BD81 DataLo_Dcache: 0x00000001 - 2368110C, DataHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0000001C TEXT_START : 0x21003178 DATA_START : 0x260888A0 Cause 0000040C (Code 0x3): TLB (store) exception 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010: TLB (store) exception, CPU signal 10, PC = 0x22768478 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Possible software fault. Upon reccurence, please collect crashinfo, "show tech" and contact Cisco Technical Support. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z $0 : 00000000 00000000, AT : 00000000 29130000, v0 : 00000000 00000001, v1 : 00000000 0D8B8540 a0 : 00000000 00000000, a1 : 00000000 0D8B8584, a2 : 00000000 2A2F8ABC, a3 : 00000000 00000004 t0 : 00000000 00000020, t1 : 00000000 500099E1, t2 : 00000000 500081E0, t3 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFF2 t4 : 00000000 0000000E, t5 : 00000000 00000000, t6 : 00000000 0D95F890, t7 : 00000000 000001FF s0 : 00000000 00000000, s1 : 00000000 2A2FDB40, s2 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFEC, s3 : 00000000 3080C980 s4 : 00000000 0D95F89E, s5 : 00000000 2A300EE0, s6 : 00000000 00000000, s7 : 00000000 0000000E t8 : 00000000 000007FC, t9 : 00000000 2A300200, k0 : 00000000 00000000, k1 : 00000000 00000000 gp : 00000000 29133C00, sp : 00000000 3022FBB8, s8 : 00000000 00000054, ra : 00000000 22768424 EPC : 22768478, ErrorEPC : 80412AB4, SREG : 500099E3 MDLO : 87126668, MDHI : D990ADBB, BadVaddr : 00000014 CacheErr_Icache : 0x007F7F00 - 000040D8, CacheErr_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 00001FA0 TagLo_Icache : 0x00000000 - 23642303, DataLo_Icache : 0xAFBF0018 - 0D81ADDB DataHi_Icache: 0x00000000 - 00000001 TagLo_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 2277E583, TagHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0912BD81 DataLo_Dcache: 0x00000001 - 2368110C, DataHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0000001C TEXT_START : 0x21003178 DATA_START : 0x260888A0 Cause 0000040C (Code 0x3): TLB (store) exception Writing crashinfo to flash:crashinfo_20101028-220211-UTC 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010: TLB (store) exception, CPU signal 10, PC = 0x22768478 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Possible software fault. Upon reccurence, please collect crashinfo, "show tech" and contact Cisco Technical Support. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z $0 : 00000000 00000000, AT : 00000000 29130000, v0 : 00000000 00000001, v1 : 00000000 0D8B8540 a0 : 00000000 00000000, a1 : 00000000 0D8B8584, a2 : 00000000 2A2F8ABC, a3 : 00000000 00000004 t0 : 00000000 00000020, t1 : 00000000 500099E1, t2 : 00000000 500081E0, t3 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFF2 t4 : 00000000 0000000E, t5 : 00000000 00000000, t6 : 00000000 0D95F890, t7 : 00000000 000001FF s0 : 00000000 00000000, s1 : 00000000 2A2FDB40, s2 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFEC, s3 : 00000000 3080C980 s4 : 00000000 0D95F89E, s5 : 00000000 2A300EE0, s6 : 00000000 00000000, s7 : 00000000 0000000E t8 : 00000000 000007FC, t9 : 00000000 2A300200, k0 : 00000000 00000000, k1 : 00000000 00000000 gp : 00000000 29133C00, sp : 00000000 3022FBB8, s8 : 00000000 00000054, ra : 00000000 22768424 EPC : 22768478, ErrorEPC : 80412AB4, SREG : 500099E3 MDLO : 87126668, MDHI : D990ADBB, BadVaddr : 00000014 CacheErr_Icache : 0x007F7F00 - 000040D8, CacheErr_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 00001FA0 TagLo_Icache : 0x00000000 - 23642303, DataLo_Icache : 0xAFBF0018 - 0D81ADDB DataHi_Icache: 0x00000000 - 00000001 TagLo_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 2277E583, TagHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0912BD81 DataLo_Dcache: 0x00000001 - 2368110C, DataHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0000001C TEXT_START : 0x21003178 DATA_START : 0x260888A0 Cause 0000040C (Code 0x3): TLB (store) exception -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z === Flushing messages (22:02:12 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010) === Buffered messages: Oct 28 20:52:40.075: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface SM1/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:52:42.195: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:52:42.195: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down Oct 28 20:52:42.195: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to down Oct 28 20:52:44.631: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface SM1/1, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:01.655: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:01.923: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/1, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:02.075: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Station 0/1/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:02.075: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Station 0/1/1, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:43.739: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/0, changed state to operational status down due to cable removal Oct 28 20:53:44.739: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/1, changed state to operational status down due to cable removal Queued messages: No warm reboot Storage System received a Bus Error exception * signal= 0xa, code= 0x40c, context= 0x29726b74 PC = 0x22768478, SP = 0x3022fbb8, RA = 0x22768424 Cause Reg = 0x0000040c, Status Reg = 0x500099e3 System Bootstrap, Version 15.0(1r)M6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport Copyright (c) 2010 by cisco Systems, Inc. Total memory size = 512 MB - On-board = 512 MB, DIMM0 = 0 MB CISCO2911/K9 platform with 524288 Kbytes of main memory Main memory is configured to 72/-1(On-board/DIMM0) bit mode with ECC enabled Readonly ROMMON initialized program load complete, entry point: 0x80803000, size: 0x1b340 IOS Image Load Test ___________________ Digitally Signed Development Software program load complete, entry point: 0x81000000, size: 0x40b6b74 Self decompressing the image : ############################################################################################################# -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2691036> or simply reply to this email. -- -- -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2691978> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699015> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699042> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699089> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699640> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2704890> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2703353> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2708817> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2712882> or simply reply to this email. -- -- -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2713045> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2713062> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2713416> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2716531> or simply reply to this email.
	Sign in to vote. Flag Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. Top

Ken Romo Posts: 36 Join Date: 8/13/10 Recent Posts	RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Answer 11/20/10 7:34 AM as a reply to Radhika Miriyala. Mark as an Answer Submit Reply with Quote Quick Reply Radhika, I have my application running on a virtual machine on the sre-v but I need to use the FXO and FXS ports on the router to complete my testing and those ports will not start without the PVDM. Ken Ken, They are still looking into it. I will keep you posted on any new information. Can you continue with trying out SRE-v with out the PVDM in your setup? Thanks, Radhika
	Sign in to vote. Flag Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. Top

Radhika Miriyala Posts: 174 Join Date: 8/12/10 Recent Posts	RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Answer 11/20/10 7:34 AM as a reply to Ken Romo. Mark as an Answer Submit Reply with Quote Quick Reply Ok Ken thanks for updating us. We will try to get a fix as soon as we can. From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 9:57 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I have my application running on a virtual machine on the sre-v but I need to use the FXO and FXS ports on the router to complete my testing and those ports will not start without the PVDM. Ken Ken, They are still looking into it. I will keep you posted on any new information. Can you continue with trying out SRE-v with out the PVDM in your setup? Thanks, Radhika -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2716602> or simply reply to this email.
	Sign in to vote. Flag Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. Top

Ken Romo Posts: 36 Join Date: 8/13/10 Recent Posts	RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Answer 11/20/10 7:34 AM as a reply to Radhika Miriyala. Mark as an Answer Submit Reply with Quote Quick Reply Radhika, As you mentioned I am continuing testing on the SRE-V until you get a fix for the IOS. I have installed and configured our application in a VM on the SRE however I am having trouble accessing an external network from the VM (running Windows 2003 server). I would like to access the 172.17.17.0 255.255.255.248 from my VM. Below are the settings from my VM and ISR/SRE, do I need to add a route on the ISR for this to happen? VM (I can ping the GigEth 0/0 from my VM) IP address ¿ 10.62.64.10 Subnet ¿ 255.255.255.0 Gateway 10.62.64.2 ISR interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip address 172.17.17.130 255.255.248.0 duplex auto speed auto interface SM1/0 ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/0 service-module ip address 172.17.17.129 255.255.248.0 !Application: SRE-V Running on SMV service-module ip default-gateway 172.17.17.130 service-module mgf ip address 10.62.64.1 255.255.255.0 service-module mgf ip default-gateway 10.62.64.2 ! interface SM1/1 description Internal switch interface connected to Service Module switchport mode trunk ! interface Vlan1 ip address 10.62.64.2 255.255.255.0 ! ! ip route 172.17.17.129 255.255.255.255 SM1/0 Ken, They are still looking into it. I will keep you posted on any new information. Can you continue with trying out SRE-v with out the PVDM in your setup? Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 9:26 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Any new status today on new IOS? Thanks in advance, Ken Thanks Ken. The information you have below is good enough. From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 2:26 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Radhika Miriyala in Service Ready Engine Virtualizatio Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I have it running with debug on and not sure what I am supposed to be looking for. Here is the command you asked me to run: boxer#sh voice dsp group slot 0 dsp 1: State: UP, firmware: 27.2.0 Max signal/voice channel: 16/16 Max credits: 240 num_of_sig_chnls_allocated: 4 Transcoding channels allocated: 0 Group: FLEX_GROUP_VOICE, complexity: FLEX Shared credits: 240, reserved credits: 0 Signaling channels allocated: 4 Voice channels allocated: 0 Credits used (rounded-up): 0 Slot: 0 Device idx: 0 PVDM Slot: 0 Dsp Type: SP2600 Ken, Can you try the following to make sure the PVDM is working as expected. A) sh voice dsp group slot 0 dsp 1: State: UP, firmware: 28.0.126 <<<< (out put would be something like this) ... <http://mce_host/html/js/editor/http://developer.cisco.com/cisco2-theme/images/emoticons/cool.gif> debug vpm dsp Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 11:12 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Radhika Miriyala in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Radhika Miriyala has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Ken, I think what you did is fine but I will check with IOs team to confirm if they want any additional tests. Appreciate your trying all the tests for us. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 11:00 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, The router seemed to work with the PVDM before configuring the sre-v, is there a particular test they would like me to try? Ken Ken, Yes the IOS team was able to reproduce it. They are working on fixing the issue. Also one quick question the IOS team wanted to know was if the have used the PVDM successfully before the using sre-v. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 9:45 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Do you know if the IOS team has been able to reproduce this yet? Thanks in advance, Ken Romo Ken, The IOS team is trying to reproduce this in their setup. I will let you know what the finding are or if we need a debug session with you (if they can¿t reproduce in their setup) Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 9:03 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Anything new here today? Thanks again, Ken Ken, Right now it looks an IOS bug but we need to reproduce this in house so we can confirm for sure. I will keep you in the loop on what we find. If it turns out to be an issue with this particular PVDM I will let you know. Appreciate all your help with this. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 9:51 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, So what is the root cause? The IOS or the PVDMS? Do I need to RMA my PVDMS? Let me know thank you. Ken Ken, Thanks for the information. We will check internally if this has been tested. I will cancel the debug session for today since we most likely have the root cause for the issue. We will try to reproduce this internally and if we need further information from you will setup a different session. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 8:49 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, The PVDMS is: PVDM3-16 V01 S/N FOC14200FNK Is this what you were looking for? Ken Ken, I am not sure if it is the PVDM that is bad but it could be a bug in the IOS image also where you have pvdm and the SRE module it could be some issue. For now can you continute to do beta for SRE-v without the PVDMS. I will check with the team and get back to you as to how to proceed. Can you let me know what PVDM models you have so we can try to reproduce this in our lab. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 3:59 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I pulled the PVDM and it is working. Does this mean the PVDM is bad? Ken Ken, Please try out the new image sent by Brett to you when you get a chance. Also one difference we noticed is that you have PVDM¿s in your setup that we don not have in our test setup. Would it be possible to remove the PVDMS temporarily and try the ping? This may help us root cause the issue. I will also schedule a WebEx for tomorrow morning 10:30 PST with the IOS developer so we can take a look if the change of IOS image and removal of PVDM¿s does not solve the issue. Please let me know if that time slot does not work for you. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 11:19 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Here you go: boxer#show vlan-switch VLAN Name Status Ports ---- -------------------------------- --------- ------------------------------- 1 default active 1002 fddi-default act/unsup 1003 token-ring-default act/unsup 1004 fddinet-default act/unsup 1005 trnet-default act/unsup VLAN Type SAID MTU Parent RingNo BridgeNo Stp BrdgMode Trans1 Trans2 ---- ----- ---------- ----- ------ ------ -------- ---- -------- ------ ------ 1 enet 100001 1500 - - - - - 1002 1003 1002 fddi 101002 1500 - - - - - 1 1003 1003 tr 101003 1500 1005 0 - - srb 1 1002 1004 fdnet 101004 1500 - - 1 ibm - 0 0 1005 trnet 101005 1500 - - 1 ibm - 0 0 boxer#sh platform mgf module Registered Module Information Code: NR - Not Registered, TM - Trust Mode, SP - Scheduling Profile BL - Buffer Level, TR - Traffic Rate, PT - Pause Threshold slot vlan type/ID TM SP BL TR PT ---- ---- ---------- ------- --- ------ ----- ---- ISM NR EHWIC-0 NR EHWIC-1 NR EHWIC-2 NR EHWIC-3 NR PVDM-0 2 PVDM/5 UP 1 low 1000 low PVDM-1 2 PVDM/5 UP 1 low 1000 low SM-1 1 Switch/3 UP 1 low 1000 high Thanks Ken. Can you also give us the output of the following. 1) show vlan-switch 2) ¿show platform mgf module¿ before the crash happens. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:50 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I will try whatever you suggest, just let me know when you have posted the new IOS. Below is my config: boxer#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 5777 bytes ! version 15.1 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname boxer ! boot-start-marker boot system flash0 c2900-universalk9-mz.SSA.151-2.19.T boot-end-marker ! ! logging buffered 51200 warnings ! no aaa new-model ! no ipv6 cef ip source-route ip cef ! ! ! ! ! ip domain name yourdomain.com multilink bundle-name authenticated ! ! ! ! ! crypto pki token default removal timeout 0 ! crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-1999750280 enrollment selfsigned subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-1999750280 revocation-check none rsakeypair TP-self-signed-1999750280 ! ! crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-1999750280 certificate self-signed 01 3082024C 308201B5 A0030201 02020101 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 04050030 31312F30 2D060355 04031326 494F532D 53656C66 2D536967 6E65642D 43657274 69666963 6174652D 31393939 37353032 3830301E 170D3130 31303230 32323335 32365A17 0D323030 31303130 30303030 305A3031 312F302D 06035504 03132649 4F532D53 656C662D 5369676E 65642D43 65727469 66696361 74652D31 39393937 35303238 3030819F 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 01050003 818D0030 81890281 81009378 2E139D79 DCA59865 14AB3398 870362B7 40BB9C13 A5DC5315 6108DF92 5E78CF06 A40D4DB5 B66D410E FAFE75AC 764997B1 5C551A47 CFA00109 520352EC 33A69E24 B3C1175B 136FC62A 8BE4637E B834059B FC7CAA6E 957DA0BB 66D8DC49 80F82890 981FFCFE 0DC7E6F9 53287989 3887C5F6 AF59D0BE B502E11E FD16F556 DBB90203 010001A3 74307230 0F060355 1D130101 FF040530 030101FF 301F0603 551D1104 18301682 14626F78 65722E79 6F757264 6F6D6169 6E2E636F 6D301F06 03551D23 04183016 80143541 7934E424 4B9A60DB E6C908C3 C20BAA17 D058301D 0603551D 0E041604 14354179 34E4244B 9A60DBE6 C908C3C2 0BAA17D0 58300D06 092A8648 86F70D01 01040500 03818100 3D222AB5 177D452F 153DCA26 1D7ECB49 58BCBF60 DA18DC04 94B82EA3 76884EBC D7131641 08687C04 6C6645DF 78B2D2F8 409BCAD7 50AF5091 B99614FD C2424D89 407A9109 BCA20473 F4CE33D4 4B126483 C240C0B9 7A628E53 E419FEC3 B8853671 03113F5E 47FA8120 9F9A7A9D 11498FE0 82C96578 8FD9770A EBD27F73 DF2E1487 quit voice-card 0 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! license udi pid CISCO2911/K9 sn FTX1422A077 hw-module pvdm 0/0 ! hw-module sm 1 ! ! ! username jack privilege 15 secret 5 $1$c5QR$fYGTbhWRKsBZ1JpNyIQGG1 username marco privilege 15 secret 5 $1$amqq$5pI0T7mUViDL5Y.NqX/yz. ! redundancy ! ! ! ! ! ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0 description To tusqa network ip address 172.17.17.130 255.255.248.0 duplex auto speed auto ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface GigabitEthernet0/2 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface SM1/0 ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/0 service-module ip address 172.17.17.129 255.255.248.0 !Application: SRE-V Running on SMV service-module ip default-gateway 172.17.17.130 service-module mgf ip address 10.62.64.1 255.255.255.0 service-module mgf ip default-gateway 10.62.64.2 ! interface SM1/1 description Internal switch interface connected to Service Module switchport mode trunk ! interface Vlan1 ip address 10.62.64.2 255.255.255.0 ! ip forward-protocol nd ! ip http server ip http access-class 23 ip http authentication local ip http secure-server ip http timeout-policy idle 60 life 86400 requests 10000 ! ip route 172.17.17.129 255.255.255.255 SM1/0 ! ! ! ! control-plane ! ! voice-port 0/0/0 ! voice-port 0/0/1 ! voice-port 0/1/0 ! voice-port 0/1/1 ! ! ! mgcp profile default ! ! ! ! ! gatekeeper shutdown ! ! banner exec ^C % Password expiration warning. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Cisco Configuration Professional (Cisco CP) is installed on this device and it provides the default username "cisco" for one-time use. If you have already used the username "cisco" to login to the router and your IOS image supports the "one-time" user option, then this username has already expired. You will not be able to login to the router with this username after you exit this session. It is strongly suggested that you create a new username with a privilege level of 15 using the following command. username <myuser> privilege 15 secret 0 <mypassword> Replace <myuser> and <mypassword> with the username and password you want to use. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ^C banner login ^C ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Cisco Configuration Professional (Cisco CP) is installed on this device. This feature requires the one-time use of the username "cisco" with the password "cisco". These default credentials have a privilege level of 15. YOU MUST USE CISCO CP or the CISCO IOS CLI TO CHANGE THESE PUBLICLY-KNOWN CREDENTIALS Here are the Cisco IOS commands. username <myuser> privilege 15 secret 0 <mypassword> no username cisco Replace <myuser> and <mypassword> with the username and password you want to use. IF YOU DO NOT CHANGE THE PUBLICLY-KNOWN CREDENTIALS, YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO LOG INTO THE DEVICE AGAIN AFTER YOU HAVE LOGGED OFF. For more information about Cisco CP please follow the instructions in the QUICK START GUIDE for your router or go to http://www.cisco.com/go/ciscocp ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ^C ! line con 0 login local line aux 0 line 67 no activation-character no exec transport preferred none transport input all transport output pad telnet rlogin lapb-ta mop udptn v120 ssh stopbits 1 flowcontrol software line vty 0 4 privilege level 15 login local transport input telnet line vty 5 15 privilege level 15 login local transport input telnet ssh ! exception data-corruption buffer truncate scheduler allocate 20000 1000 end Ken, Thanks for trying out the image for us. We are trying to reproduce this on our end but have had no luck so far. Can you please send us the output of show running-config from your router. Also we have one more image that we would like you to try it out before the debusg session would that be ok? Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:22 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I tried the new OS and still getting same IOS crash. As mentioned I will work around your schedule so let me if you were able to get someone from the IOS team to help troubleshoot today. Thanks in advance, Ken Romo Ken, I am trying to get some help from the IOS team since this a router crash. So I will setup the webex session to debug for some time Monday so we can collect all the information and try out any suggestion from them. For Now We will post a newer IOS image to the beta Site and can you give that a try to see if that will solve the issue. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 8:24 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I will work around your schedule, anytime you are available, I will make myself available. email: kromo@opentext.com Thanks in advance, Ken Romo +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Ken, Would a webex session tomorrow morning (any time between 10:00 and 1:00) work for you? Let me know the time that would work for you and also your email address so I can send you a webex invite. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 3:12 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Radhika Miriyala in Service Ready Engine Virtualizatio Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, No worries, we are trying to work this out together and I appreciate the help. s/m 1/1 is set as trunk but I went ahead and reconfigured to truank again and reloaded OS and get the same crash when I ping to the MGF interface from the SRE (I attached the errors at the bottom of this message). Ken, Sorry I just realized the mistake. I meant to say make the interface sm 1/1 as trunk. Sorry about the confusion. Please try it out. Thanks, Radhika boxer# %ALIGN-1-FATAL: Illegal access to a low address 22:02:10 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010 addr=0x14, pc=0x22765BD8z , ra=0x22765B84z , sp=0x3022FBB8 %ALIGN-1-FATAL: Illegal access to a low address 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010 addr=0x14, pc=0x22765BD8z , ra=0x22765B84z , sp=0x3022FBB8 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010: TLB (store) exception, CPU signal 10, PC = 0x22768478 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Possible software fault. Upon reccurence, please collect crashinfo, "show tech" and contact Cisco Technical Support. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z $0 : 00000000 00000000, AT : 00000000 29130000, v0 : 00000000 00000001, v1 : 00000000 0D8B8540 a0 : 00000000 00000000, a1 : 00000000 0D8B8584, a2 : 00000000 2A2F8ABC, a3 : 00000000 00000004 t0 : 00000000 00000020, t1 : 00000000 500099E1, t2 : 00000000 500081E0, t3 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFF2 t4 : 00000000 0000000E, t5 : 00000000 00000000, t6 : 00000000 0D95F890, t7 : 00000000 000001FF s0 : 00000000 00000000, s1 : 00000000 2A2FDB40, s2 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFEC, s3 : 00000000 3080C980 s4 : 00000000 0D95F89E, s5 : 00000000 2A300EE0, s6 : 00000000 00000000, s7 : 00000000 0000000E t8 : 00000000 000007FC, t9 : 00000000 2A300200, k0 : 00000000 00000000, k1 : 00000000 00000000 gp : 00000000 29133C00, sp : 00000000 3022FBB8, s8 : 00000000 00000054, ra : 00000000 22768424 EPC : 22768478, ErrorEPC : 80412AB4, SREG : 500099E3 MDLO : 87126668, MDHI : D990ADBB, BadVaddr : 00000014 CacheErr_Icache : 0x007F7F00 - 000040D8, CacheErr_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 00001FA0 TagLo_Icache : 0x00000000 - 23642303, DataLo_Icache : 0xAFBF0018 - 0D81ADDB DataHi_Icache: 0x00000000 - 00000001 TagLo_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 2277E583, TagHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0912BD81 DataLo_Dcache: 0x00000001 - 2368110C, DataHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0000001C TEXT_START : 0x21003178 DATA_START : 0x260888A0 Cause 0000040C (Code 0x3): TLB (store) exception 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010: TLB (store) exception, CPU signal 10, PC = 0x22768478 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Possible software fault. Upon reccurence, please collect crashinfo, "show tech" and contact Cisco Technical Support. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z $0 : 00000000 00000000, AT : 00000000 29130000, v0 : 00000000 00000001, v1 : 00000000 0D8B8540 a0 : 00000000 00000000, a1 : 00000000 0D8B8584, a2 : 00000000 2A2F8ABC, a3 : 00000000 00000004 t0 : 00000000 00000020, t1 : 00000000 500099E1, t2 : 00000000 500081E0, t3 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFF2 t4 : 00000000 0000000E, t5 : 00000000 00000000, t6 : 00000000 0D95F890, t7 : 00000000 000001FF s0 : 00000000 00000000, s1 : 00000000 2A2FDB40, s2 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFEC, s3 : 00000000 3080C980 s4 : 00000000 0D95F89E, s5 : 00000000 2A300EE0, s6 : 00000000 00000000, s7 : 00000000 0000000E t8 : 00000000 000007FC, t9 : 00000000 2A300200, k0 : 00000000 00000000, k1 : 00000000 00000000 gp : 00000000 29133C00, sp : 00000000 3022FBB8, s8 : 00000000 00000054, ra : 00000000 22768424 EPC : 22768478, ErrorEPC : 80412AB4, SREG : 500099E3 MDLO : 87126668, MDHI : D990ADBB, BadVaddr : 00000014 CacheErr_Icache : 0x007F7F00 - 000040D8, CacheErr_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 00001FA0 TagLo_Icache : 0x00000000 - 23642303, DataLo_Icache : 0xAFBF0018 - 0D81ADDB DataHi_Icache: 0x00000000 - 00000001 TagLo_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 2277E583, TagHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0912BD81 DataLo_Dcache: 0x00000001 - 2368110C, DataHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0000001C TEXT_START : 0x21003178 DATA_START : 0x260888A0 Cause 0000040C (Code 0x3): TLB (store) exception Writing crashinfo to flash:crashinfo_20101028-220211-UTC 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010: TLB (store) exception, CPU signal 10, PC = 0x22768478 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Possible software fault. Upon reccurence, please collect crashinfo, "show tech" and contact Cisco Technical Support. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z $0 : 00000000 00000000, AT : 00000000 29130000, v0 : 00000000 00000001, v1 : 00000000 0D8B8540 a0 : 00000000 00000000, a1 : 00000000 0D8B8584, a2 : 00000000 2A2F8ABC, a3 : 00000000 00000004 t0 : 00000000 00000020, t1 : 00000000 500099E1, t2 : 00000000 500081E0, t3 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFF2 t4 : 00000000 0000000E, t5 : 00000000 00000000, t6 : 00000000 0D95F890, t7 : 00000000 000001FF s0 : 00000000 00000000, s1 : 00000000 2A2FDB40, s2 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFEC, s3 : 00000000 3080C980 s4 : 00000000 0D95F89E, s5 : 00000000 2A300EE0, s6 : 00000000 00000000, s7 : 00000000 0000000E t8 : 00000000 000007FC, t9 : 00000000 2A300200, k0 : 00000000 00000000, k1 : 00000000 00000000 gp : 00000000 29133C00, sp : 00000000 3022FBB8, s8 : 00000000 00000054, ra : 00000000 22768424 EPC : 22768478, ErrorEPC : 80412AB4, SREG : 500099E3 MDLO : 87126668, MDHI : D990ADBB, BadVaddr : 00000014 CacheErr_Icache : 0x007F7F00 - 000040D8, CacheErr_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 00001FA0 TagLo_Icache : 0x00000000 - 23642303, DataLo_Icache : 0xAFBF0018 - 0D81ADDB DataHi_Icache: 0x00000000 - 00000001 TagLo_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 2277E583, TagHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0912BD81 DataLo_Dcache: 0x00000001 - 2368110C, DataHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0000001C TEXT_START : 0x21003178 DATA_START : 0x260888A0 Cause 0000040C (Code 0x3): TLB (store) exception -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z === Flushing messages (22:02:12 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010) === Buffered messages: Oct 28 20:52:40.075: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface SM1/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:52:42.195: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:52:42.195: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down Oct 28 20:52:42.195: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to down Oct 28 20:52:44.631: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface SM1/1, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:01.655: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:01.923: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/1, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:02.075: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Station 0/1/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:02.075: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Station 0/1/1, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:43.739: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/0, changed state to operational status down due to cable removal Oct 28 20:53:44.739: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/1, changed state to operational status down due to cable removal Queued messages: No warm reboot Storage System received a Bus Error exception * signal= 0xa, code= 0x40c, context= 0x29726b74 PC = 0x22768478, SP = 0x3022fbb8, RA = 0x22768424 Cause Reg = 0x0000040c, Status Reg = 0x500099e3 System Bootstrap, Version 15.0(1r)M6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport Copyright (c) 2010 by cisco Systems, Inc. Total memory size = 512 MB - On-board = 512 MB, DIMM0 = 0 MB CISCO2911/K9 platform with 524288 Kbytes of main memory Main memory is configured to 72/-1(On-board/DIMM0) bit mode with ECC enabled Readonly ROMMON initialized program load complete, entry point: 0x80803000, size: 0x1b340 IOS Image Load Test ___________________ Digitally Signed Development Software program load complete, entry point: 0x81000000, size: 0x40b6b74 Self decompressing the image : ############################################################################################################# -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2691036> or simply reply to this email. -- -- -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2691978> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699015> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699042> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699089> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699640> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2704890> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2703353> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2708817> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2712882> or simply reply to this email. -- -- -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2713045> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2713062> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2713416> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2716531> or simply reply to this email.
	Sign in to vote. Flag Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. Top

Radhika Miriyala Posts: 174 Join Date: 8/12/10 Recent Posts	RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Answer 11/20/10 7:34 AM as a reply to Ken Romo. Mark as an Answer Submit Reply with Quote Quick Reply Ken, Are you trying to ping some particular system in your network? What is the default gateway for that system? The issue you are having most like is the the Vlan 1 network is private to the this particular ISR and your other systems/switches are not aware of this Vlan1. So what I would do is add a route for this 10.62.64.0 network to point to your gige 0/0 on the ISR. Please try that out and let me know if you still have issues. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 8:38 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, As you mentioned I am continuing testing on the SRE-V until you get a fix for the IOS. I have installed and configured our application in a VM on the SRE however I am having trouble accessing an external network from the VM (running Windows 2003 server). I would like to access the 172.17.17.0 255.255.255.248 from my VM. Below are the settings from my VM and ISR/SRE, do I need to add a route on the ISR for this to happen? VM (I can ping the GigEth 0/0 from my VM) IP address ¿ 10.62.64.10 Subnet ¿ 255.255.255.0 Gateway 10.62.64.2 ISR interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip address 172.17.17.130 255.255.248.0 duplex auto speed auto interface SM1/0 ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/0 service-module ip address 172.17.17.129 255.255.248.0 !Application: SRE-V Running on SMV service-module ip default-gateway 172.17.17.130 service-module mgf ip address 10.62.64.1 255.255.255.0 service-module mgf ip default-gateway 10.62.64.2 ! interface SM1/1 description Internal switch interface connected to Service Module switchport mode trunk ! interface Vlan1 ip address 10.62.64.2 255.255.255.0 ! ! ip route 172.17.17.129 255.255.255.255 SM1/0 Ken, They are still looking into it. I will keep you posted on any new information. Can you continue with trying out SRE-v with out the PVDM in your setup? Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 9:26 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Any new status today on new IOS? Thanks in advance, Ken Thanks Ken. The information you have below is good enough. From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 2:26 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Radhika Miriyala in Service Ready Engine Virtualizatio Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I have it running with debug on and not sure what I am supposed to be looking for. Here is the command you asked me to run: boxer#sh voice dsp group slot 0 dsp 1: State: UP, firmware: 27.2.0 Max signal/voice channel: 16/16 Max credits: 240 num_of_sig_chnls_allocated: 4 Transcoding channels allocated: 0 Group: FLEX_GROUP_VOICE, complexity: FLEX Shared credits: 240, reserved credits: 0 Signaling channels allocated: 4 Voice channels allocated: 0 Credits used (rounded-up): 0 Slot: 0 Device idx: 0 PVDM Slot: 0 Dsp Type: SP2600 Ken, Can you try the following to make sure the PVDM is working as expected. A) sh voice dsp group slot 0 dsp 1: State: UP, firmware: 28.0.126 <<<< (out put would be something like this) ... <http://mce_host/html/js/editor/http://developer.cisco.com/cisco2-theme/images/emoticons/cool.gif> debug vpm dsp Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 11:12 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Radhika Miriyala in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Radhika Miriyala has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Ken, I think what you did is fine but I will check with IOs team to confirm if they want any additional tests. Appreciate your trying all the tests for us. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 11:00 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, The router seemed to work with the PVDM before configuring the sre-v, is there a particular test they would like me to try? Ken Ken, Yes the IOS team was able to reproduce it. They are working on fixing the issue. Also one quick question the IOS team wanted to know was if the have used the PVDM successfully before the using sre-v. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 9:45 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Do you know if the IOS team has been able to reproduce this yet? Thanks in advance, Ken Romo Ken, The IOS team is trying to reproduce this in their setup. I will let you know what the finding are or if we need a debug session with you (if they can¿t reproduce in their setup) Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 9:03 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Anything new here today? Thanks again, Ken Ken, Right now it looks an IOS bug but we need to reproduce this in house so we can confirm for sure. I will keep you in the loop on what we find. If it turns out to be an issue with this particular PVDM I will let you know. Appreciate all your help with this. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 9:51 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, So what is the root cause? The IOS or the PVDMS? Do I need to RMA my PVDMS? Let me know thank you. Ken Ken, Thanks for the information. We will check internally if this has been tested. I will cancel the debug session for today since we most likely have the root cause for the issue. We will try to reproduce this internally and if we need further information from you will setup a different session. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 8:49 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, The PVDMS is: PVDM3-16 V01 S/N FOC14200FNK Is this what you were looking for? Ken Ken, I am not sure if it is the PVDM that is bad but it could be a bug in the IOS image also where you have pvdm and the SRE module it could be some issue. For now can you continute to do beta for SRE-v without the PVDMS. I will check with the team and get back to you as to how to proceed. Can you let me know what PVDM models you have so we can try to reproduce this in our lab. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 3:59 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I pulled the PVDM and it is working. Does this mean the PVDM is bad? Ken Ken, Please try out the new image sent by Brett to you when you get a chance. Also one difference we noticed is that you have PVDM¿s in your setup that we don not have in our test setup. Would it be possible to remove the PVDMS temporarily and try the ping? This may help us root cause the issue. I will also schedule a WebEx for tomorrow morning 10:30 PST with the IOS developer so we can take a look if the change of IOS image and removal of PVDM¿s does not solve the issue. Please let me know if that time slot does not work for you. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 11:19 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Here you go: boxer#show vlan-switch VLAN Name Status Ports ---- -------------------------------- --------- ------------------------------- 1 default active 1002 fddi-default act/unsup 1003 token-ring-default act/unsup 1004 fddinet-default act/unsup 1005 trnet-default act/unsup VLAN Type SAID MTU Parent RingNo BridgeNo Stp BrdgMode Trans1 Trans2 ---- ----- ---------- ----- ------ ------ -------- ---- -------- ------ ------ 1 enet 100001 1500 - - - - - 1002 1003 1002 fddi 101002 1500 - - - - - 1 1003 1003 tr 101003 1500 1005 0 - - srb 1 1002 1004 fdnet 101004 1500 - - 1 ibm - 0 0 1005 trnet 101005 1500 - - 1 ibm - 0 0 boxer#sh platform mgf module Registered Module Information Code: NR - Not Registered, TM - Trust Mode, SP - Scheduling Profile BL - Buffer Level, TR - Traffic Rate, PT - Pause Threshold slot vlan type/ID TM SP BL TR PT ---- ---- ---------- ------- --- ------ ----- ---- ISM NR EHWIC-0 NR EHWIC-1 NR EHWIC-2 NR EHWIC-3 NR PVDM-0 2 PVDM/5 UP 1 low 1000 low PVDM-1 2 PVDM/5 UP 1 low 1000 low SM-1 1 Switch/3 UP 1 low 1000 high Thanks Ken. Can you also give us the output of the following. 1) show vlan-switch 2) ¿show platform mgf module¿ before the crash happens. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:50 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I will try whatever you suggest, just let me know when you have posted the new IOS. Below is my config: boxer#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 5777 bytes ! version 15.1 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname boxer ! boot-start-marker boot system flash0 c2900-universalk9-mz.SSA.151-2.19.T boot-end-marker ! ! logging buffered 51200 warnings ! no aaa new-model ! no ipv6 cef ip source-route ip cef ! ! ! ! ! ip domain name yourdomain.com multilink bundle-name authenticated ! ! ! ! ! crypto pki token default removal timeout 0 ! crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-1999750280 enrollment selfsigned subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-1999750280 revocation-check none rsakeypair TP-self-signed-1999750280 ! ! crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-1999750280 certificate self-signed 01 3082024C 308201B5 A0030201 02020101 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 04050030 31312F30 2D060355 04031326 494F532D 53656C66 2D536967 6E65642D 43657274 69666963 6174652D 31393939 37353032 3830301E 170D3130 31303230 32323335 32365A17 0D323030 31303130 30303030 305A3031 312F302D 06035504 03132649 4F532D53 656C662D 5369676E 65642D43 65727469 66696361 74652D31 39393937 35303238 3030819F 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 01050003 818D0030 81890281 81009378 2E139D79 DCA59865 14AB3398 870362B7 40BB9C13 A5DC5315 6108DF92 5E78CF06 A40D4DB5 B66D410E FAFE75AC 764997B1 5C551A47 CFA00109 520352EC 33A69E24 B3C1175B 136FC62A 8BE4637E B834059B FC7CAA6E 957DA0BB 66D8DC49 80F82890 981FFCFE 0DC7E6F9 53287989 3887C5F6 AF59D0BE B502E11E FD16F556 DBB90203 010001A3 74307230 0F060355 1D130101 FF040530 030101FF 301F0603 551D1104 18301682 14626F78 65722E79 6F757264 6F6D6169 6E2E636F 6D301F06 03551D23 04183016 80143541 7934E424 4B9A60DB E6C908C3 C20BAA17 D058301D 0603551D 0E041604 14354179 34E4244B 9A60DBE6 C908C3C2 0BAA17D0 58300D06 092A8648 86F70D01 01040500 03818100 3D222AB5 177D452F 153DCA26 1D7ECB49 58BCBF60 DA18DC04 94B82EA3 76884EBC D7131641 08687C04 6C6645DF 78B2D2F8 409BCAD7 50AF5091 B99614FD C2424D89 407A9109 BCA20473 F4CE33D4 4B126483 C240C0B9 7A628E53 E419FEC3 B8853671 03113F5E 47FA8120 9F9A7A9D 11498FE0 82C96578 8FD9770A EBD27F73 DF2E1487 quit voice-card 0 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! license udi pid CISCO2911/K9 sn FTX1422A077 hw-module pvdm 0/0 ! hw-module sm 1 ! ! ! username jack privilege 15 secret 5 $1$c5QR$fYGTbhWRKsBZ1JpNyIQGG1 username marco privilege 15 secret 5 $1$amqq$5pI0T7mUViDL5Y.NqX/yz. ! redundancy ! ! ! ! ! ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0 description To tusqa network ip address 172.17.17.130 255.255.248.0 duplex auto speed auto ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface GigabitEthernet0/2 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface SM1/0 ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/0 service-module ip address 172.17.17.129 255.255.248.0 !Application: SRE-V Running on SMV service-module ip default-gateway 172.17.17.130 service-module mgf ip address 10.62.64.1 255.255.255.0 service-module mgf ip default-gateway 10.62.64.2 ! interface SM1/1 description Internal switch interface connected to Service Module switchport mode trunk ! interface Vlan1 ip address 10.62.64.2 255.255.255.0 ! ip forward-protocol nd ! ip http server ip http access-class 23 ip http authentication local ip http secure-server ip http timeout-policy idle 60 life 86400 requests 10000 ! ip route 172.17.17.129 255.255.255.255 SM1/0 ! ! ! ! control-plane ! ! voice-port 0/0/0 ! voice-port 0/0/1 ! voice-port 0/1/0 ! voice-port 0/1/1 ! ! ! mgcp profile default ! ! ! ! ! gatekeeper shutdown ! ! banner exec ^C % Password expiration warning. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Cisco Configuration Professional (Cisco CP) is installed on this device and it provides the default username "cisco" for one-time use. If you have already used the username "cisco" to login to the router and your IOS image supports the "one-time" user option, then this username has already expired. You will not be able to login to the router with this username after you exit this session. It is strongly suggested that you create a new username with a privilege level of 15 using the following command. username <myuser> privilege 15 secret 0 <mypassword> Replace <myuser> and <mypassword> with the username and password you want to use. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ^C banner login ^C ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Cisco Configuration Professional (Cisco CP) is installed on this device. This feature requires the one-time use of the username "cisco" with the password "cisco". These default credentials have a privilege level of 15. YOU MUST USE CISCO CP or the CISCO IOS CLI TO CHANGE THESE PUBLICLY-KNOWN CREDENTIALS Here are the Cisco IOS commands. username <myuser> privilege 15 secret 0 <mypassword> no username cisco Replace <myuser> and <mypassword> with the username and password you want to use. IF YOU DO NOT CHANGE THE PUBLICLY-KNOWN CREDENTIALS, YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO LOG INTO THE DEVICE AGAIN AFTER YOU HAVE LOGGED OFF. For more information about Cisco CP please follow the instructions in the QUICK START GUIDE for your router or go to http://www.cisco.com/go/ciscocp ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ^C ! line con 0 login local line aux 0 line 67 no activation-character no exec transport preferred none transport input all transport output pad telnet rlogin lapb-ta mop udptn v120 ssh stopbits 1 flowcontrol software line vty 0 4 privilege level 15 login local transport input telnet line vty 5 15 privilege level 15 login local transport input telnet ssh ! exception data-corruption buffer truncate scheduler allocate 20000 1000 end Ken, Thanks for trying out the image for us. We are trying to reproduce this on our end but have had no luck so far. Can you please send us the output of show running-config from your router. Also we have one more image that we would like you to try it out before the debusg session would that be ok? Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:22 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I tried the new OS and still getting same IOS crash. As mentioned I will work around your schedule so let me if you were able to get someone from the IOS team to help troubleshoot today. Thanks in advance, Ken Romo Ken, I am trying to get some help from the IOS team since this a router crash. So I will setup the webex session to debug for some time Monday so we can collect all the information and try out any suggestion from them. For Now We will post a newer IOS image to the beta Site and can you give that a try to see if that will solve the issue. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 8:24 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I will work around your schedule, anytime you are available, I will make myself available. email: kromo@opentext.com Thanks in advance, Ken Romo +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Ken, Would a webex session tomorrow morning (any time between 10:00 and 1:00) work for you? Let me know the time that would work for you and also your email address so I can send you a webex invite. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 3:12 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Radhika Miriyala in Service Ready Engine Virtualizatio Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, No worries, we are trying to work this out together and I appreciate the help. s/m 1/1 is set as trunk but I went ahead and reconfigured to truank again and reloaded OS and get the same crash when I ping to the MGF interface from the SRE (I attached the errors at the bottom of this message). Ken, Sorry I just realized the mistake. I meant to say make the interface sm 1/1 as trunk. Sorry about the confusion. Please try it out. Thanks, Radhika boxer# %ALIGN-1-FATAL: Illegal access to a low address 22:02:10 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010 addr=0x14, pc=0x22765BD8z , ra=0x22765B84z , sp=0x3022FBB8 %ALIGN-1-FATAL: Illegal access to a low address 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010 addr=0x14, pc=0x22765BD8z , ra=0x22765B84z , sp=0x3022FBB8 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010: TLB (store) exception, CPU signal 10, PC = 0x22768478 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Possible software fault. Upon reccurence, please collect crashinfo, "show tech" and contact Cisco Technical Support. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z $0 : 00000000 00000000, AT : 00000000 29130000, v0 : 00000000 00000001, v1 : 00000000 0D8B8540 a0 : 00000000 00000000, a1 : 00000000 0D8B8584, a2 : 00000000 2A2F8ABC, a3 : 00000000 00000004 t0 : 00000000 00000020, t1 : 00000000 500099E1, t2 : 00000000 500081E0, t3 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFF2 t4 : 00000000 0000000E, t5 : 00000000 00000000, t6 : 00000000 0D95F890, t7 : 00000000 000001FF s0 : 00000000 00000000, s1 : 00000000 2A2FDB40, s2 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFEC, s3 : 00000000 3080C980 s4 : 00000000 0D95F89E, s5 : 00000000 2A300EE0, s6 : 00000000 00000000, s7 : 00000000 0000000E t8 : 00000000 000007FC, t9 : 00000000 2A300200, k0 : 00000000 00000000, k1 : 00000000 00000000 gp : 00000000 29133C00, sp : 00000000 3022FBB8, s8 : 00000000 00000054, ra : 00000000 22768424 EPC : 22768478, ErrorEPC : 80412AB4, SREG : 500099E3 MDLO : 87126668, MDHI : D990ADBB, BadVaddr : 00000014 CacheErr_Icache : 0x007F7F00 - 000040D8, CacheErr_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 00001FA0 TagLo_Icache : 0x00000000 - 23642303, DataLo_Icache : 0xAFBF0018 - 0D81ADDB DataHi_Icache: 0x00000000 - 00000001 TagLo_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 2277E583, TagHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0912BD81 DataLo_Dcache: 0x00000001 - 2368110C, DataHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0000001C TEXT_START : 0x21003178 DATA_START : 0x260888A0 Cause 0000040C (Code 0x3): TLB (store) exception 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010: TLB (store) exception, CPU signal 10, PC = 0x22768478 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Possible software fault. Upon reccurence, please collect crashinfo, "show tech" and contact Cisco Technical Support. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z $0 : 00000000 00000000, AT : 00000000 29130000, v0 : 00000000 00000001, v1 : 00000000 0D8B8540 a0 : 00000000 00000000, a1 : 00000000 0D8B8584, a2 : 00000000 2A2F8ABC, a3 : 00000000 00000004 t0 : 00000000 00000020, t1 : 00000000 500099E1, t2 : 00000000 500081E0, t3 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFF2 t4 : 00000000 0000000E, t5 : 00000000 00000000, t6 : 00000000 0D95F890, t7 : 00000000 000001FF s0 : 00000000 00000000, s1 : 00000000 2A2FDB40, s2 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFEC, s3 : 00000000 3080C980 s4 : 00000000 0D95F89E, s5 : 00000000 2A300EE0, s6 : 00000000 00000000, s7 : 00000000 0000000E t8 : 00000000 000007FC, t9 : 00000000 2A300200, k0 : 00000000 00000000, k1 : 00000000 00000000 gp : 00000000 29133C00, sp : 00000000 3022FBB8, s8 : 00000000 00000054, ra : 00000000 22768424 EPC : 22768478, ErrorEPC : 80412AB4, SREG : 500099E3 MDLO : 87126668, MDHI : D990ADBB, BadVaddr : 00000014 CacheErr_Icache : 0x007F7F00 - 000040D8, CacheErr_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 00001FA0 TagLo_Icache : 0x00000000 - 23642303, DataLo_Icache : 0xAFBF0018 - 0D81ADDB DataHi_Icache: 0x00000000 - 00000001 TagLo_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 2277E583, TagHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0912BD81 DataLo_Dcache: 0x00000001 - 2368110C, DataHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0000001C TEXT_START : 0x21003178 DATA_START : 0x260888A0 Cause 0000040C (Code 0x3): TLB (store) exception Writing crashinfo to flash:crashinfo_20101028-220211-UTC 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010: TLB (store) exception, CPU signal 10, PC = 0x22768478 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Possible software fault. Upon reccurence, please collect crashinfo, "show tech" and contact Cisco Technical Support. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z $0 : 00000000 00000000, AT : 00000000 29130000, v0 : 00000000 00000001, v1 : 00000000 0D8B8540 a0 : 00000000 00000000, a1 : 00000000 0D8B8584, a2 : 00000000 2A2F8ABC, a3 : 00000000 00000004 t0 : 00000000 00000020, t1 : 00000000 500099E1, t2 : 00000000 500081E0, t3 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFF2 t4 : 00000000 0000000E, t5 : 00000000 00000000, t6 : 00000000 0D95F890, t7 : 00000000 000001FF s0 : 00000000 00000000, s1 : 00000000 2A2FDB40, s2 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFEC, s3 : 00000000 3080C980 s4 : 00000000 0D95F89E, s5 : 00000000 2A300EE0, s6 : 00000000 00000000, s7 : 00000000 0000000E t8 : 00000000 000007FC, t9 : 00000000 2A300200, k0 : 00000000 00000000, k1 : 00000000 00000000 gp : 00000000 29133C00, sp : 00000000 3022FBB8, s8 : 00000000 00000054, ra : 00000000 22768424 EPC : 22768478, ErrorEPC : 80412AB4, SREG : 500099E3 MDLO : 87126668, MDHI : D990ADBB, BadVaddr : 00000014 CacheErr_Icache : 0x007F7F00 - 000040D8, CacheErr_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 00001FA0 TagLo_Icache : 0x00000000 - 23642303, DataLo_Icache : 0xAFBF0018 - 0D81ADDB DataHi_Icache: 0x00000000 - 00000001 TagLo_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 2277E583, TagHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0912BD81 DataLo_Dcache: 0x00000001 - 2368110C, DataHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0000001C TEXT_START : 0x21003178 DATA_START : 0x260888A0 Cause 0000040C (Code 0x3): TLB (store) exception -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z === Flushing messages (22:02:12 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010) === Buffered messages: Oct 28 20:52:40.075: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface SM1/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:52:42.195: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:52:42.195: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down Oct 28 20:52:42.195: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to down Oct 28 20:52:44.631: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface SM1/1, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:01.655: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:01.923: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/1, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:02.075: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Station 0/1/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:02.075: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Station 0/1/1, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:43.739: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/0, changed state to operational status down due to cable removal Oct 28 20:53:44.739: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/1, changed state to operational status down due to cable removal Queued messages: No warm reboot Storage System received a Bus Error exception * signal= 0xa, code= 0x40c, context= 0x29726b74 PC = 0x22768478, SP = 0x3022fbb8, RA = 0x22768424 Cause Reg = 0x0000040c, Status Reg = 0x500099e3 System Bootstrap, Version 15.0(1r)M6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport Copyright (c) 2010 by cisco Systems, Inc. Total memory size = 512 MB - On-board = 512 MB, DIMM0 = 0 MB CISCO2911/K9 platform with 524288 Kbytes of main memory Main memory is configured to 72/-1(On-board/DIMM0) bit mode with ECC enabled Readonly ROMMON initialized program load complete, entry point: 0x80803000, size: 0x1b340 IOS Image Load Test ___________________ Digitally Signed Development Software program load complete, entry point: 0x81000000, size: 0x40b6b74 Self decompressing the image : ############################################################################################################# -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2691036> or simply reply to this email. -- -- -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2691978> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699015> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699042> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699089> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699640> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2704890> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2703353> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2708817> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2712882> or simply reply to this email. -- -- -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2713045> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2713062> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2713416> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2716531> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2734857> or simply reply to this email.
	Sign in to vote. Flag Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. Top

Ken Romo Posts: 36 Join Date: 8/13/10 Recent Posts	RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Answer 11/20/10 7:34 AM as a reply to Radhika Miriyala. Mark as an Answer Submit Reply with Quote Quick Reply Radhika, I added: ip route 10.62.64.0 255.255.255.255 GigabitEthernet0/0 to the ISR and I still can't ping the 172.17.17.0 255.255.248.0 network Ken Ken, Are you trying to ping some particular system in your network? What is the default gateway for that system? The issue you are having most like is the the Vlan 1 network is private to the this particular ISR and your other systems/switches are not aware of this Vlan1. So what I would do is add a route for this 10.62.64.0 network to point to your gige 0/0 on the ISR. Please try that out and let me know if you still have issues. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 8:38 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, As you mentioned I am continuing testing on the SRE-V until you get a fix for the IOS. I have installed and configured our application in a VM on the SRE however I am having trouble accessing an external network from the VM (running Windows 2003 server). I would like to access the 172.17.17.0 255.255.255.248 from my VM. Below are the settings from my VM and ISR/SRE, do I need to add a route on the ISR for this to happen? VM (I can ping the GigEth 0/0 from my VM) IP address ¿ 10.62.64.10 Subnet ¿ 255.255.255.0 Gateway 10.62.64.2 ISR interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip address 172.17.17.130 255.255.248.0 duplex auto speed auto interface SM1/0 ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/0 service-module ip address 172.17.17.129 255.255.248.0 !Application: SRE-V Running on SMV service-module ip default-gateway 172.17.17.130 service-module mgf ip address 10.62.64.1 255.255.255.0 service-module mgf ip default-gateway 10.62.64.2 ! interface SM1/1 description Internal switch interface connected to Service Module switchport mode trunk ! interface Vlan1 ip address 10.62.64.2 255.255.255.0 ! ! ip route 172.17.17.129 255.255.255.255 SM1/0 Ken, They are still looking into it. I will keep you posted on any new information. Can you continue with trying out SRE-v with out the PVDM in your setup? Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 9:26 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Any new status today on new IOS? Thanks in advance, Ken Thanks Ken. The information you have below is good enough. From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 2:26 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Radhika Miriyala in Service Ready Engine Virtualizatio Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I have it running with debug on and not sure what I am supposed to be looking for. Here is the command you asked me to run: boxer#sh voice dsp group slot 0 dsp 1: State: UP, firmware: 27.2.0 Max signal/voice channel: 16/16 Max credits: 240 num_of_sig_chnls_allocated: 4 Transcoding channels allocated: 0 Group: FLEX_GROUP_VOICE, complexity: FLEX Shared credits: 240, reserved credits: 0 Signaling channels allocated: 4 Voice channels allocated: 0 Credits used (rounded-up): 0 Slot: 0 Device idx: 0 PVDM Slot: 0 Dsp Type: SP2600 Ken, Can you try the following to make sure the PVDM is working as expected. A) sh voice dsp group slot 0 dsp 1: State: UP, firmware: 28.0.126 <<<< (out put would be something like this) ... <http://mce_host/html/js/editor/http://developer.cisco.com/cisco2-theme/images/emoticons/cool.gif> debug vpm dsp Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 11:12 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Radhika Miriyala in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Radhika Miriyala has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Ken, I think what you did is fine but I will check with IOs team to confirm if they want any additional tests. Appreciate your trying all the tests for us. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 11:00 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, The router seemed to work with the PVDM before configuring the sre-v, is there a particular test they would like me to try? Ken Ken, Yes the IOS team was able to reproduce it. They are working on fixing the issue. Also one quick question the IOS team wanted to know was if the have used the PVDM successfully before the using sre-v. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 9:45 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Do you know if the IOS team has been able to reproduce this yet? Thanks in advance, Ken Romo Ken, The IOS team is trying to reproduce this in their setup. I will let you know what the finding are or if we need a debug session with you (if they can¿t reproduce in their setup) Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 9:03 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Anything new here today? Thanks again, Ken Ken, Right now it looks an IOS bug but we need to reproduce this in house so we can confirm for sure. I will keep you in the loop on what we find. If it turns out to be an issue with this particular PVDM I will let you know. Appreciate all your help with this. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 9:51 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, So what is the root cause? The IOS or the PVDMS? Do I need to RMA my PVDMS? Let me know thank you. Ken Ken, Thanks for the information. We will check internally if this has been tested. I will cancel the debug session for today since we most likely have the root cause for the issue. We will try to reproduce this internally and if we need further information from you will setup a different session. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 8:49 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, The PVDMS is: PVDM3-16 V01 S/N FOC14200FNK Is this what you were looking for? Ken Ken, I am not sure if it is the PVDM that is bad but it could be a bug in the IOS image also where you have pvdm and the SRE module it could be some issue. For now can you continute to do beta for SRE-v without the PVDMS. I will check with the team and get back to you as to how to proceed. Can you let me know what PVDM models you have so we can try to reproduce this in our lab. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 3:59 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I pulled the PVDM and it is working. Does this mean the PVDM is bad? Ken Ken, Please try out the new image sent by Brett to you when you get a chance. Also one difference we noticed is that you have PVDM¿s in your setup that we don not have in our test setup. Would it be possible to remove the PVDMS temporarily and try the ping? This may help us root cause the issue. I will also schedule a WebEx for tomorrow morning 10:30 PST with the IOS developer so we can take a look if the change of IOS image and removal of PVDM¿s does not solve the issue. Please let me know if that time slot does not work for you. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 11:19 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Here you go: boxer#show vlan-switch VLAN Name Status Ports ---- -------------------------------- --------- ------------------------------- 1 default active 1002 fddi-default act/unsup 1003 token-ring-default act/unsup 1004 fddinet-default act/unsup 1005 trnet-default act/unsup VLAN Type SAID MTU Parent RingNo BridgeNo Stp BrdgMode Trans1 Trans2 ---- ----- ---------- ----- ------ ------ -------- ---- -------- ------ ------ 1 enet 100001 1500 - - - - - 1002 1003 1002 fddi 101002 1500 - - - - - 1 1003 1003 tr 101003 1500 1005 0 - - srb 1 1002 1004 fdnet 101004 1500 - - 1 ibm - 0 0 1005 trnet 101005 1500 - - 1 ibm - 0 0 boxer#sh platform mgf module Registered Module Information Code: NR - Not Registered, TM - Trust Mode, SP - Scheduling Profile BL - Buffer Level, TR - Traffic Rate, PT - Pause Threshold slot vlan type/ID TM SP BL TR PT ---- ---- ---------- ------- --- ------ ----- ---- ISM NR EHWIC-0 NR EHWIC-1 NR EHWIC-2 NR EHWIC-3 NR PVDM-0 2 PVDM/5 UP 1 low 1000 low PVDM-1 2 PVDM/5 UP 1 low 1000 low SM-1 1 Switch/3 UP 1 low 1000 high Thanks Ken. Can you also give us the output of the following. 1) show vlan-switch 2) ¿show platform mgf module¿ before the crash happens. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:50 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I will try whatever you suggest, just let me know when you have posted the new IOS. Below is my config: boxer#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 5777 bytes ! version 15.1 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname boxer ! boot-start-marker boot system flash0 c2900-universalk9-mz.SSA.151-2.19.T boot-end-marker ! ! logging buffered 51200 warnings ! no aaa new-model ! no ipv6 cef ip source-route ip cef ! ! ! ! ! ip domain name yourdomain.com multilink bundle-name authenticated ! ! ! ! ! crypto pki token default removal timeout 0 ! crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-1999750280 enrollment selfsigned subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-1999750280 revocation-check none rsakeypair TP-self-signed-1999750280 ! ! crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-1999750280 certificate self-signed 01 3082024C 308201B5 A0030201 02020101 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 04050030 31312F30 2D060355 04031326 494F532D 53656C66 2D536967 6E65642D 43657274 69666963 6174652D 31393939 37353032 3830301E 170D3130 31303230 32323335 32365A17 0D323030 31303130 30303030 305A3031 312F302D 06035504 03132649 4F532D53 656C662D 5369676E 65642D43 65727469 66696361 74652D31 39393937 35303238 3030819F 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 01050003 818D0030 81890281 81009378 2E139D79 DCA59865 14AB3398 870362B7 40BB9C13 A5DC5315 6108DF92 5E78CF06 A40D4DB5 B66D410E FAFE75AC 764997B1 5C551A47 CFA00109 520352EC 33A69E24 B3C1175B 136FC62A 8BE4637E B834059B FC7CAA6E 957DA0BB 66D8DC49 80F82890 981FFCFE 0DC7E6F9 53287989 3887C5F6 AF59D0BE B502E11E FD16F556 DBB90203 010001A3 74307230 0F060355 1D130101 FF040530 030101FF 301F0603 551D1104 18301682 14626F78 65722E79 6F757264 6F6D6169 6E2E636F 6D301F06 03551D23 04183016 80143541 7934E424 4B9A60DB E6C908C3 C20BAA17 D058301D 0603551D 0E041604 14354179 34E4244B 9A60DBE6 C908C3C2 0BAA17D0 58300D06 092A8648 86F70D01 01040500 03818100 3D222AB5 177D452F 153DCA26 1D7ECB49 58BCBF60 DA18DC04 94B82EA3 76884EBC D7131641 08687C04 6C6645DF 78B2D2F8 409BCAD7 50AF5091 B99614FD C2424D89 407A9109 BCA20473 F4CE33D4 4B126483 C240C0B9 7A628E53 E419FEC3 B8853671 03113F5E 47FA8120 9F9A7A9D 11498FE0 82C96578 8FD9770A EBD27F73 DF2E1487 quit voice-card 0 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! license udi pid CISCO2911/K9 sn FTX1422A077 hw-module pvdm 0/0 ! hw-module sm 1 ! ! ! username jack privilege 15 secret 5 $1$c5QR$fYGTbhWRKsBZ1JpNyIQGG1 username marco privilege 15 secret 5 $1$amqq$5pI0T7mUViDL5Y.NqX/yz. ! redundancy ! ! ! ! ! ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0 description To tusqa network ip address 172.17.17.130 255.255.248.0 duplex auto speed auto ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface GigabitEthernet0/2 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface SM1/0 ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/0 service-module ip address 172.17.17.129 255.255.248.0 !Application: SRE-V Running on SMV service-module ip default-gateway 172.17.17.130 service-module mgf ip address 10.62.64.1 255.255.255.0 service-module mgf ip default-gateway 10.62.64.2 ! interface SM1/1 description Internal switch interface connected to Service Module switchport mode trunk ! interface Vlan1 ip address 10.62.64.2 255.255.255.0 ! ip forward-protocol nd ! ip http server ip http access-class 23 ip http authentication local ip http secure-server ip http timeout-policy idle 60 life 86400 requests 10000 ! ip route 172.17.17.129 255.255.255.255 SM1/0 ! ! ! ! control-plane ! ! voice-port 0/0/0 ! voice-port 0/0/1 ! voice-port 0/1/0 ! voice-port 0/1/1 ! ! ! mgcp profile default ! ! ! ! ! gatekeeper shutdown ! ! banner exec ^C % Password expiration warning. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Cisco Configuration Professional (Cisco CP) is installed on this device and it provides the default username "cisco" for one-time use. If you have already used the username "cisco" to login to the router and your IOS image supports the "one-time" user option, then this username has already expired. You will not be able to login to the router with this username after you exit this session. It is strongly suggested that you create a new username with a privilege level of 15 using the following command. username <myuser> privilege 15 secret 0 <mypassword> Replace <myuser> and <mypassword> with the username and password you want to use. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ^C banner login ^C ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Cisco Configuration Professional (Cisco CP) is installed on this device. This feature requires the one-time use of the username "cisco" with the password "cisco". These default credentials have a privilege level of 15. YOU MUST USE CISCO CP or the CISCO IOS CLI TO CHANGE THESE PUBLICLY-KNOWN CREDENTIALS Here are the Cisco IOS commands. username <myuser> privilege 15 secret 0 <mypassword> no username cisco Replace <myuser> and <mypassword> with the username and password you want to use. IF YOU DO NOT CHANGE THE PUBLICLY-KNOWN CREDENTIALS, YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO LOG INTO THE DEVICE AGAIN AFTER YOU HAVE LOGGED OFF. For more information about Cisco CP please follow the instructions in the QUICK START GUIDE for your router or go to http://www.cisco.com/go/ciscocp ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ^C ! line con 0 login local line aux 0 line 67 no activation-character no exec transport preferred none transport input all transport output pad telnet rlogin lapb-ta mop udptn v120 ssh stopbits 1 flowcontrol software line vty 0 4 privilege level 15 login local transport input telnet line vty 5 15 privilege level 15 login local transport input telnet ssh ! exception data-corruption buffer truncate scheduler allocate 20000 1000 end Ken, Thanks for trying out the image for us. We are trying to reproduce this on our end but have had no luck so far. Can you please send us the output of show running-config from your router. Also we have one more image that we would like you to try it out before the debusg session would that be ok? Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:22 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I tried the new OS and still getting same IOS crash. As mentioned I will work around your schedule so let me if you were able to get someone from the IOS team to help troubleshoot today. Thanks in advance, Ken Romo Ken, I am trying to get some help from the IOS team since this a router crash. So I will setup the webex session to debug for some time Monday so we can collect all the information and try out any suggestion from them. For Now We will post a newer IOS image to the beta Site and can you give that a try to see if that will solve the issue. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 8:24 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I will work around your schedule, anytime you are available, I will make myself available. email: kromo@opentext.com Thanks in advance, Ken Romo +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Ken, Would a webex session tomorrow morning (any time between 10:00 and 1:00) work for you? Let me know the time that would work for you and also your email address so I can send you a webex invite. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 3:12 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Radhika Miriyala in Service Ready Engine Virtualizatio Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, No worries, we are trying to work this out together and I appreciate the help. s/m 1/1 is set as trunk but I went ahead and reconfigured to truank again and reloaded OS and get the same crash when I ping to the MGF interface from the SRE (I attached the errors at the bottom of this message). Ken, Sorry I just realized the mistake. I meant to say make the interface sm 1/1 as trunk. Sorry about the confusion. Please try it out. Thanks, Radhika boxer# %ALIGN-1-FATAL: Illegal access to a low address 22:02:10 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010 addr=0x14, pc=0x22765BD8z , ra=0x22765B84z , sp=0x3022FBB8 %ALIGN-1-FATAL: Illegal access to a low address 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010 addr=0x14, pc=0x22765BD8z , ra=0x22765B84z , sp=0x3022FBB8 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010: TLB (store) exception, CPU signal 10, PC = 0x22768478 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Possible software fault. Upon reccurence, please collect crashinfo, "show tech" and contact Cisco Technical Support. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z $0 : 00000000 00000000, AT : 00000000 29130000, v0 : 00000000 00000001, v1 : 00000000 0D8B8540 a0 : 00000000 00000000, a1 : 00000000 0D8B8584, a2 : 00000000 2A2F8ABC, a3 : 00000000 00000004 t0 : 00000000 00000020, t1 : 00000000 500099E1, t2 : 00000000 500081E0, t3 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFF2 t4 : 00000000 0000000E, t5 : 00000000 00000000, t6 : 00000000 0D95F890, t7 : 00000000 000001FF s0 : 00000000 00000000, s1 : 00000000 2A2FDB40, s2 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFEC, s3 : 00000000 3080C980 s4 : 00000000 0D95F89E, s5 : 00000000 2A300EE0, s6 : 00000000 00000000, s7 : 00000000 0000000E t8 : 00000000 000007FC, t9 : 00000000 2A300200, k0 : 00000000 00000000, k1 : 00000000 00000000 gp : 00000000 29133C00, sp : 00000000 3022FBB8, s8 : 00000000 00000054, ra : 00000000 22768424 EPC : 22768478, ErrorEPC : 80412AB4, SREG : 500099E3 MDLO : 87126668, MDHI : D990ADBB, BadVaddr : 00000014 CacheErr_Icache : 0x007F7F00 - 000040D8, CacheErr_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 00001FA0 TagLo_Icache : 0x00000000 - 23642303, DataLo_Icache : 0xAFBF0018 - 0D81ADDB DataHi_Icache: 0x00000000 - 00000001 TagLo_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 2277E583, TagHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0912BD81 DataLo_Dcache: 0x00000001 - 2368110C, DataHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0000001C TEXT_START : 0x21003178 DATA_START : 0x260888A0 Cause 0000040C (Code 0x3): TLB (store) exception 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010: TLB (store) exception, CPU signal 10, PC = 0x22768478 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Possible software fault. Upon reccurence, please collect crashinfo, "show tech" and contact Cisco Technical Support. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z $0 : 00000000 00000000, AT : 00000000 29130000, v0 : 00000000 00000001, v1 : 00000000 0D8B8540 a0 : 00000000 00000000, a1 : 00000000 0D8B8584, a2 : 00000000 2A2F8ABC, a3 : 00000000 00000004 t0 : 00000000 00000020, t1 : 00000000 500099E1, t2 : 00000000 500081E0, t3 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFF2 t4 : 00000000 0000000E, t5 : 00000000 00000000, t6 : 00000000 0D95F890, t7 : 00000000 000001FF s0 : 00000000 00000000, s1 : 00000000 2A2FDB40, s2 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFEC, s3 : 00000000 3080C980 s4 : 00000000 0D95F89E, s5 : 00000000 2A300EE0, s6 : 00000000 00000000, s7 : 00000000 0000000E t8 : 00000000 000007FC, t9 : 00000000 2A300200, k0 : 00000000 00000000, k1 : 00000000 00000000 gp : 00000000 29133C00, sp : 00000000 3022FBB8, s8 : 00000000 00000054, ra : 00000000 22768424 EPC : 22768478, ErrorEPC : 80412AB4, SREG : 500099E3 MDLO : 87126668, MDHI : D990ADBB, BadVaddr : 00000014 CacheErr_Icache : 0x007F7F00 - 000040D8, CacheErr_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 00001FA0 TagLo_Icache : 0x00000000 - 23642303, DataLo_Icache : 0xAFBF0018 - 0D81ADDB DataHi_Icache: 0x00000000 - 00000001 TagLo_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 2277E583, TagHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0912BD81 DataLo_Dcache: 0x00000001 - 2368110C, DataHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0000001C TEXT_START : 0x21003178 DATA_START : 0x260888A0 Cause 0000040C (Code 0x3): TLB (store) exception Writing crashinfo to flash:crashinfo_20101028-220211-UTC 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010: TLB (store) exception, CPU signal 10, PC = 0x22768478 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Possible software fault. Upon reccurence, please collect crashinfo, "show tech" and contact Cisco Technical Support. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z $0 : 00000000 00000000, AT : 00000000 29130000, v0 : 00000000 00000001, v1 : 00000000 0D8B8540 a0 : 00000000 00000000, a1 : 00000000 0D8B8584, a2 : 00000000 2A2F8ABC, a3 : 00000000 00000004 t0 : 00000000 00000020, t1 : 00000000 500099E1, t2 : 00000000 500081E0, t3 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFF2 t4 : 00000000 0000000E, t5 : 00000000 00000000, t6 : 00000000 0D95F890, t7 : 00000000 000001FF s0 : 00000000 00000000, s1 : 00000000 2A2FDB40, s2 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFEC, s3 : 00000000 3080C980 s4 : 00000000 0D95F89E, s5 : 00000000 2A300EE0, s6 : 00000000 00000000, s7 : 00000000 0000000E t8 : 00000000 000007FC, t9 : 00000000 2A300200, k0 : 00000000 00000000, k1 : 00000000 00000000 gp : 00000000 29133C00, sp : 00000000 3022FBB8, s8 : 00000000 00000054, ra : 00000000 22768424 EPC : 22768478, ErrorEPC : 80412AB4, SREG : 500099E3 MDLO : 87126668, MDHI : D990ADBB, BadVaddr : 00000014 CacheErr_Icache : 0x007F7F00 - 000040D8, CacheErr_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 00001FA0 TagLo_Icache : 0x00000000 - 23642303, DataLo_Icache : 0xAFBF0018 - 0D81ADDB DataHi_Icache: 0x00000000 - 00000001 TagLo_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 2277E583, TagHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0912BD81 DataLo_Dcache: 0x00000001 - 2368110C, DataHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0000001C TEXT_START : 0x21003178 DATA_START : 0x260888A0 Cause 0000040C (Code 0x3): TLB (store) exception -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z === Flushing messages (22:02:12 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010) === Buffered messages: Oct 28 20:52:40.075: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface SM1/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:52:42.195: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:52:42.195: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down Oct 28 20:52:42.195: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to down Oct 28 20:52:44.631: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface SM1/1, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:01.655: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:01.923: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/1, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:02.075: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Station 0/1/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:02.075: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Station 0/1/1, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:43.739: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/0, changed state to operational status down due to cable removal Oct 28 20:53:44.739: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/1, changed state to operational status down due to cable removal Queued messages: No warm reboot Storage System received a Bus Error exception * signal= 0xa, code= 0x40c, context= 0x29726b74 PC = 0x22768478, SP = 0x3022fbb8, RA = 0x22768424 Cause Reg = 0x0000040c, Status Reg = 0x500099e3 System Bootstrap, Version 15.0(1r)M6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport Copyright (c) 2010 by cisco Systems, Inc. Total memory size = 512 MB - On-board = 512 MB, DIMM0 = 0 MB CISCO2911/K9 platform with 524288 Kbytes of main memory Main memory is configured to 72/-1(On-board/DIMM0) bit mode with ECC enabled Readonly ROMMON initialized program load complete, entry point: 0x80803000, size: 0x1b340 IOS Image Load Test ___________________ Digitally Signed Development Software program load complete, entry point: 0x81000000, size: 0x40b6b74 Self decompressing the image : ############################################################################################################# -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2691036> or simply reply to this email. -- -- -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2691978> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699015> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699042> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699089> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699640> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2704890> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2703353> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2708817> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2712882> or simply reply to this email. -- -- -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2713045> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2713062> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2713416> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2716531> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2734857> or simply reply to this email.
	Sign in to vote. Flag Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. Top

Radhika Miriyala Posts: 174 Join Date: 8/12/10 Recent Posts	RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Answer 11/20/10 7:34 AM as a reply to Ken Romo. Mark as an Answer Submit Reply with Quote Quick Reply Ken, You need to add the route to the PC you are trying to reach this from not in the ISR. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 12:24 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I added: ip route 10.62.64.0 255.255.255.255 GigabitEthernet0/0 to the ISR and I still can't ping the 172.17.17.0 255.255.248.0 network Ken Ken, Are you trying to ping some particular system in your network? What is the default gateway for that system? The issue you are having most like is the the Vlan 1 network is private to the this particular ISR and your other systems/switches are not aware of this Vlan1. So what I would do is add a route for this 10.62.64.0 network to point to your gige 0/0 on the ISR. Please try that out and let me know if you still have issues. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 8:38 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, As you mentioned I am continuing testing on the SRE-V until you get a fix for the IOS. I have installed and configured our application in a VM on the SRE however I am having trouble accessing an external network from the VM (running Windows 2003 server). I would like to access the 172.17.17.0 255.255.255.248 from my VM. Below are the settings from my VM and ISR/SRE, do I need to add a route on the ISR for this to happen? VM (I can ping the GigEth 0/0 from my VM) IP address ¿ 10.62.64.10 Subnet ¿ 255.255.255.0 Gateway 10.62.64.2 ISR interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip address 172.17.17.130 255.255.248.0 duplex auto speed auto interface SM1/0 ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/0 service-module ip address 172.17.17.129 255.255.248.0 !Application: SRE-V Running on SMV service-module ip default-gateway 172.17.17.130 service-module mgf ip address 10.62.64.1 255.255.255.0 service-module mgf ip default-gateway 10.62.64.2 ! interface SM1/1 description Internal switch interface connected to Service Module switchport mode trunk ! interface Vlan1 ip address 10.62.64.2 255.255.255.0 ! ! ip route 172.17.17.129 255.255.255.255 SM1/0 Ken, They are still looking into it. I will keep you posted on any new information. Can you continue with trying out SRE-v with out the PVDM in your setup? Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 9:26 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Any new status today on new IOS? Thanks in advance, Ken Thanks Ken. The information you have below is good enough. From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 2:26 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Radhika Miriyala in Service Ready Engine Virtualizatio Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I have it running with debug on and not sure what I am supposed to be looking for. Here is the command you asked me to run: boxer#sh voice dsp group slot 0 dsp 1: State: UP, firmware: 27.2.0 Max signal/voice channel: 16/16 Max credits: 240 num_of_sig_chnls_allocated: 4 Transcoding channels allocated: 0 Group: FLEX_GROUP_VOICE, complexity: FLEX Shared credits: 240, reserved credits: 0 Signaling channels allocated: 4 Voice channels allocated: 0 Credits used (rounded-up): 0 Slot: 0 Device idx: 0 PVDM Slot: 0 Dsp Type: SP2600 Ken, Can you try the following to make sure the PVDM is working as expected. A) sh voice dsp group slot 0 dsp 1: State: UP, firmware: 28.0.126 <<<< (out put would be something like this) ... <http://mce_host/html/js/editor/http://developer.cisco.com/cisco2-theme/images/emoticons/cool.gif> debug vpm dsp Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 11:12 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Radhika Miriyala in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Radhika Miriyala has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Ken, I think what you did is fine but I will check with IOs team to confirm if they want any additional tests. Appreciate your trying all the tests for us. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 11:00 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, The router seemed to work with the PVDM before configuring the sre-v, is there a particular test they would like me to try? Ken Ken, Yes the IOS team was able to reproduce it. They are working on fixing the issue. Also one quick question the IOS team wanted to know was if the have used the PVDM successfully before the using sre-v. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 9:45 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Do you know if the IOS team has been able to reproduce this yet? Thanks in advance, Ken Romo Ken, The IOS team is trying to reproduce this in their setup. I will let you know what the finding are or if we need a debug session with you (if they can¿t reproduce in their setup) Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 9:03 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Anything new here today? Thanks again, Ken Ken, Right now it looks an IOS bug but we need to reproduce this in house so we can confirm for sure. I will keep you in the loop on what we find. If it turns out to be an issue with this particular PVDM I will let you know. Appreciate all your help with this. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 9:51 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, So what is the root cause? The IOS or the PVDMS? Do I need to RMA my PVDMS? Let me know thank you. Ken Ken, Thanks for the information. We will check internally if this has been tested. I will cancel the debug session for today since we most likely have the root cause for the issue. We will try to reproduce this internally and if we need further information from you will setup a different session. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 8:49 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, The PVDMS is: PVDM3-16 V01 S/N FOC14200FNK Is this what you were looking for? Ken Ken, I am not sure if it is the PVDM that is bad but it could be a bug in the IOS image also where you have pvdm and the SRE module it could be some issue. For now can you continute to do beta for SRE-v without the PVDMS. I will check with the team and get back to you as to how to proceed. Can you let me know what PVDM models you have so we can try to reproduce this in our lab. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 3:59 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I pulled the PVDM and it is working. Does this mean the PVDM is bad? Ken Ken, Please try out the new image sent by Brett to you when you get a chance. Also one difference we noticed is that you have PVDM¿s in your setup that we don not have in our test setup. Would it be possible to remove the PVDMS temporarily and try the ping? This may help us root cause the issue. I will also schedule a WebEx for tomorrow morning 10:30 PST with the IOS developer so we can take a look if the change of IOS image and removal of PVDM¿s does not solve the issue. Please let me know if that time slot does not work for you. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 11:19 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Here you go: boxer#show vlan-switch VLAN Name Status Ports ---- -------------------------------- --------- ------------------------------- 1 default active 1002 fddi-default act/unsup 1003 token-ring-default act/unsup 1004 fddinet-default act/unsup 1005 trnet-default act/unsup VLAN Type SAID MTU Parent RingNo BridgeNo Stp BrdgMode Trans1 Trans2 ---- ----- ---------- ----- ------ ------ -------- ---- -------- ------ ------ 1 enet 100001 1500 - - - - - 1002 1003 1002 fddi 101002 1500 - - - - - 1 1003 1003 tr 101003 1500 1005 0 - - srb 1 1002 1004 fdnet 101004 1500 - - 1 ibm - 0 0 1005 trnet 101005 1500 - - 1 ibm - 0 0 boxer#sh platform mgf module Registered Module Information Code: NR - Not Registered, TM - Trust Mode, SP - Scheduling Profile BL - Buffer Level, TR - Traffic Rate, PT - Pause Threshold slot vlan type/ID TM SP BL TR PT ---- ---- ---------- ------- --- ------ ----- ---- ISM NR EHWIC-0 NR EHWIC-1 NR EHWIC-2 NR EHWIC-3 NR PVDM-0 2 PVDM/5 UP 1 low 1000 low PVDM-1 2 PVDM/5 UP 1 low 1000 low SM-1 1 Switch/3 UP 1 low 1000 high Thanks Ken. Can you also give us the output of the following. 1) show vlan-switch 2) ¿show platform mgf module¿ before the crash happens. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:50 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I will try whatever you suggest, just let me know when you have posted the new IOS. Below is my config: boxer#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 5777 bytes ! version 15.1 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname boxer ! boot-start-marker boot system flash0 c2900-universalk9-mz.SSA.151-2.19.T boot-end-marker ! ! logging buffered 51200 warnings ! no aaa new-model ! no ipv6 cef ip source-route ip cef ! ! ! ! ! ip domain name yourdomain.com multilink bundle-name authenticated ! ! ! ! ! crypto pki token default removal timeout 0 ! crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-1999750280 enrollment selfsigned subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-1999750280 revocation-check none rsakeypair TP-self-signed-1999750280 ! ! crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-1999750280 certificate self-signed 01 3082024C 308201B5 A0030201 02020101 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 04050030 31312F30 2D060355 04031326 494F532D 53656C66 2D536967 6E65642D 43657274 69666963 6174652D 31393939 37353032 3830301E 170D3130 31303230 32323335 32365A17 0D323030 31303130 30303030 305A3031 312F302D 06035504 03132649 4F532D53 656C662D 5369676E 65642D43 65727469 66696361 74652D31 39393937 35303238 3030819F 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 01050003 818D0030 81890281 81009378 2E139D79 DCA59865 14AB3398 870362B7 40BB9C13 A5DC5315 6108DF92 5E78CF06 A40D4DB5 B66D410E FAFE75AC 764997B1 5C551A47 CFA00109 520352EC 33A69E24 B3C1175B 136FC62A 8BE4637E B834059B FC7CAA6E 957DA0BB 66D8DC49 80F82890 981FFCFE 0DC7E6F9 53287989 3887C5F6 AF59D0BE B502E11E FD16F556 DBB90203 010001A3 74307230 0F060355 1D130101 FF040530 030101FF 301F0603 551D1104 18301682 14626F78 65722E79 6F757264 6F6D6169 6E2E636F 6D301F06 03551D23 04183016 80143541 7934E424 4B9A60DB E6C908C3 C20BAA17 D058301D 0603551D 0E041604 14354179 34E4244B 9A60DBE6 C908C3C2 0BAA17D0 58300D06 092A8648 86F70D01 01040500 03818100 3D222AB5 177D452F 153DCA26 1D7ECB49 58BCBF60 DA18DC04 94B82EA3 76884EBC D7131641 08687C04 6C6645DF 78B2D2F8 409BCAD7 50AF5091 B99614FD C2424D89 407A9109 BCA20473 F4CE33D4 4B126483 C240C0B9 7A628E53 E419FEC3 B8853671 03113F5E 47FA8120 9F9A7A9D 11498FE0 82C96578 8FD9770A EBD27F73 DF2E1487 quit voice-card 0 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! license udi pid CISCO2911/K9 sn FTX1422A077 hw-module pvdm 0/0 ! hw-module sm 1 ! ! ! username jack privilege 15 secret 5 $1$c5QR$fYGTbhWRKsBZ1JpNyIQGG1 username marco privilege 15 secret 5 $1$amqq$5pI0T7mUViDL5Y.NqX/yz. ! redundancy ! ! ! ! ! ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0 description To tusqa network ip address 172.17.17.130 255.255.248.0 duplex auto speed auto ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface GigabitEthernet0/2 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface SM1/0 ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/0 service-module ip address 172.17.17.129 255.255.248.0 !Application: SRE-V Running on SMV service-module ip default-gateway 172.17.17.130 service-module mgf ip address 10.62.64.1 255.255.255.0 service-module mgf ip default-gateway 10.62.64.2 ! interface SM1/1 description Internal switch interface connected to Service Module switchport mode trunk ! interface Vlan1 ip address 10.62.64.2 255.255.255.0 ! ip forward-protocol nd ! ip http server ip http access-class 23 ip http authentication local ip http secure-server ip http timeout-policy idle 60 life 86400 requests 10000 ! ip route 172.17.17.129 255.255.255.255 SM1/0 ! ! ! ! control-plane ! ! voice-port 0/0/0 ! voice-port 0/0/1 ! voice-port 0/1/0 ! voice-port 0/1/1 ! ! ! mgcp profile default ! ! ! ! ! gatekeeper shutdown ! ! banner exec ^C % Password expiration warning. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Cisco Configuration Professional (Cisco CP) is installed on this device and it provides the default username "cisco" for one-time use. If you have already used the username "cisco" to login to the router and your IOS image supports the "one-time" user option, then this username has already expired. You will not be able to login to the router with this username after you exit this session. It is strongly suggested that you create a new username with a privilege level of 15 using the following command. username <myuser> privilege 15 secret 0 <mypassword> Replace <myuser> and <mypassword> with the username and password you want to use. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ^C banner login ^C ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Cisco Configuration Professional (Cisco CP) is installed on this device. This feature requires the one-time use of the username "cisco" with the password "cisco". These default credentials have a privilege level of 15. YOU MUST USE CISCO CP or the CISCO IOS CLI TO CHANGE THESE PUBLICLY-KNOWN CREDENTIALS Here are the Cisco IOS commands. username <myuser> privilege 15 secret 0 <mypassword> no username cisco Replace <myuser> and <mypassword> with the username and password you want to use. IF YOU DO NOT CHANGE THE PUBLICLY-KNOWN CREDENTIALS, YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO LOG INTO THE DEVICE AGAIN AFTER YOU HAVE LOGGED OFF. For more information about Cisco CP please follow the instructions in the QUICK START GUIDE for your router or go to http://www.cisco.com/go/ciscocp ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ^C ! line con 0 login local line aux 0 line 67 no activation-character no exec transport preferred none transport input all transport output pad telnet rlogin lapb-ta mop udptn v120 ssh stopbits 1 flowcontrol software line vty 0 4 privilege level 15 login local transport input telnet line vty 5 15 privilege level 15 login local transport input telnet ssh ! exception data-corruption buffer truncate scheduler allocate 20000 1000 end Ken, Thanks for trying out the image for us. We are trying to reproduce this on our end but have had no luck so far. Can you please send us the output of show running-config from your router. Also we have one more image that we would like you to try it out before the debusg session would that be ok? Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:22 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I tried the new OS and still getting same IOS crash. As mentioned I will work around your schedule so let me if you were able to get someone from the IOS team to help troubleshoot today. Thanks in advance, Ken Romo Ken, I am trying to get some help from the IOS team since this a router crash. So I will setup the webex session to debug for some time Monday so we can collect all the information and try out any suggestion from them. For Now We will post a newer IOS image to the beta Site and can you give that a try to see if that will solve the issue. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 8:24 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I will work around your schedule, anytime you are available, I will make myself available. email: kromo@opentext.com Thanks in advance, Ken Romo +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Ken, Would a webex session tomorrow morning (any time between 10:00 and 1:00) work for you? Let me know the time that would work for you and also your email address so I can send you a webex invite. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 3:12 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Radhika Miriyala in Service Ready Engine Virtualizatio Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, No worries, we are trying to work this out together and I appreciate the help. s/m 1/1 is set as trunk but I went ahead and reconfigured to truank again and reloaded OS and get the same crash when I ping to the MGF interface from the SRE (I attached the errors at the bottom of this message). Ken, Sorry I just realized the mistake. I meant to say make the interface sm 1/1 as trunk. Sorry about the confusion. Please try it out. Thanks, Radhika boxer# %ALIGN-1-FATAL: Illegal access to a low address 22:02:10 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010 addr=0x14, pc=0x22765BD8z , ra=0x22765B84z , sp=0x3022FBB8 %ALIGN-1-FATAL: Illegal access to a low address 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010 addr=0x14, pc=0x22765BD8z , ra=0x22765B84z , sp=0x3022FBB8 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010: TLB (store) exception, CPU signal 10, PC = 0x22768478 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Possible software fault. Upon reccurence, please collect crashinfo, "show tech" and contact Cisco Technical Support. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z $0 : 00000000 00000000, AT : 00000000 29130000, v0 : 00000000 00000001, v1 : 00000000 0D8B8540 a0 : 00000000 00000000, a1 : 00000000 0D8B8584, a2 : 00000000 2A2F8ABC, a3 : 00000000 00000004 t0 : 00000000 00000020, t1 : 00000000 500099E1, t2 : 00000000 500081E0, t3 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFF2 t4 : 00000000 0000000E, t5 : 00000000 00000000, t6 : 00000000 0D95F890, t7 : 00000000 000001FF s0 : 00000000 00000000, s1 : 00000000 2A2FDB40, s2 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFEC, s3 : 00000000 3080C980 s4 : 00000000 0D95F89E, s5 : 00000000 2A300EE0, s6 : 00000000 00000000, s7 : 00000000 0000000E t8 : 00000000 000007FC, t9 : 00000000 2A300200, k0 : 00000000 00000000, k1 : 00000000 00000000 gp : 00000000 29133C00, sp : 00000000 3022FBB8, s8 : 00000000 00000054, ra : 00000000 22768424 EPC : 22768478, ErrorEPC : 80412AB4, SREG : 500099E3 MDLO : 87126668, MDHI : D990ADBB, BadVaddr : 00000014 CacheErr_Icache : 0x007F7F00 - 000040D8, CacheErr_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 00001FA0 TagLo_Icache : 0x00000000 - 23642303, DataLo_Icache : 0xAFBF0018 - 0D81ADDB DataHi_Icache: 0x00000000 - 00000001 TagLo_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 2277E583, TagHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0912BD81 DataLo_Dcache: 0x00000001 - 2368110C, DataHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0000001C TEXT_START : 0x21003178 DATA_START : 0x260888A0 Cause 0000040C (Code 0x3): TLB (store) exception 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010: TLB (store) exception, CPU signal 10, PC = 0x22768478 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Possible software fault. Upon reccurence, please collect crashinfo, "show tech" and contact Cisco Technical Support. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z $0 : 00000000 00000000, AT : 00000000 29130000, v0 : 00000000 00000001, v1 : 00000000 0D8B8540 a0 : 00000000 00000000, a1 : 00000000 0D8B8584, a2 : 00000000 2A2F8ABC, a3 : 00000000 00000004 t0 : 00000000 00000020, t1 : 00000000 500099E1, t2 : 00000000 500081E0, t3 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFF2 t4 : 00000000 0000000E, t5 : 00000000 00000000, t6 : 00000000 0D95F890, t7 : 00000000 000001FF s0 : 00000000 00000000, s1 : 00000000 2A2FDB40, s2 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFEC, s3 : 00000000 3080C980 s4 : 00000000 0D95F89E, s5 : 00000000 2A300EE0, s6 : 00000000 00000000, s7 : 00000000 0000000E t8 : 00000000 000007FC, t9 : 00000000 2A300200, k0 : 00000000 00000000, k1 : 00000000 00000000 gp : 00000000 29133C00, sp : 00000000 3022FBB8, s8 : 00000000 00000054, ra : 00000000 22768424 EPC : 22768478, ErrorEPC : 80412AB4, SREG : 500099E3 MDLO : 87126668, MDHI : D990ADBB, BadVaddr : 00000014 CacheErr_Icache : 0x007F7F00 - 000040D8, CacheErr_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 00001FA0 TagLo_Icache : 0x00000000 - 23642303, DataLo_Icache : 0xAFBF0018 - 0D81ADDB DataHi_Icache: 0x00000000 - 00000001 TagLo_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 2277E583, TagHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0912BD81 DataLo_Dcache: 0x00000001 - 2368110C, DataHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0000001C TEXT_START : 0x21003178 DATA_START : 0x260888A0 Cause 0000040C (Code 0x3): TLB (store) exception Writing crashinfo to flash:crashinfo_20101028-220211-UTC 22:02:11 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010: TLB (store) exception, CPU signal 10, PC = 0x22768478 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Possible software fault. Upon reccurence, please collect crashinfo, "show tech" and contact Cisco Technical Support. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z $0 : 00000000 00000000, AT : 00000000 29130000, v0 : 00000000 00000001, v1 : 00000000 0D8B8540 a0 : 00000000 00000000, a1 : 00000000 0D8B8584, a2 : 00000000 2A2F8ABC, a3 : 00000000 00000004 t0 : 00000000 00000020, t1 : 00000000 500099E1, t2 : 00000000 500081E0, t3 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFF2 t4 : 00000000 0000000E, t5 : 00000000 00000000, t6 : 00000000 0D95F890, t7 : 00000000 000001FF s0 : 00000000 00000000, s1 : 00000000 2A2FDB40, s2 : FFFFFFFF FFFFFFEC, s3 : 00000000 3080C980 s4 : 00000000 0D95F89E, s5 : 00000000 2A300EE0, s6 : 00000000 00000000, s7 : 00000000 0000000E t8 : 00000000 000007FC, t9 : 00000000 2A300200, k0 : 00000000 00000000, k1 : 00000000 00000000 gp : 00000000 29133C00, sp : 00000000 3022FBB8, s8 : 00000000 00000054, ra : 00000000 22768424 EPC : 22768478, ErrorEPC : 80412AB4, SREG : 500099E3 MDLO : 87126668, MDHI : D990ADBB, BadVaddr : 00000014 CacheErr_Icache : 0x007F7F00 - 000040D8, CacheErr_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 00001FA0 TagLo_Icache : 0x00000000 - 23642303, DataLo_Icache : 0xAFBF0018 - 0D81ADDB DataHi_Icache: 0x00000000 - 00000001 TagLo_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 2277E583, TagHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0912BD81 DataLo_Dcache: 0x00000001 - 2368110C, DataHi_Dcache : 0x00000000 - 0000001C TEXT_START : 0x21003178 DATA_START : 0x260888A0 Cause 0000040C (Code 0x3): TLB (store) exception -Traceback= 0x22765BD8z 0x2277BD38z 0x216B1D3Cz 0x2161F25Cz 0x2117F618z 0x211810C4z 0x2115AFACz 0x21A6814Cz 0x22DC9A60z === Flushing messages (22:02:12 UTC Thu Oct 28 2010) === Buffered messages: Oct 28 20:52:40.075: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface SM1/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:52:42.195: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:52:42.195: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down Oct 28 20:52:42.195: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to down Oct 28 20:52:44.631: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface SM1/1, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:01.655: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:01.923: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/1, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:02.075: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Station 0/1/0, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:02.075: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Station 0/1/1, changed state to up Oct 28 20:53:43.739: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/0, changed state to operational status down due to cable removal Oct 28 20:53:44.739: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Foreign Exchange Office 0/0/1, changed state to operational status down due to cable removal Queued messages: No warm reboot Storage System received a Bus Error exception * signal= 0xa, code= 0x40c, context= 0x29726b74 PC = 0x22768478, SP = 0x3022fbb8, RA = 0x22768424 Cause Reg = 0x0000040c, Status Reg = 0x500099e3 System Bootstrap, Version 15.0(1r)M6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport Copyright (c) 2010 by cisco Systems, Inc. Total memory size = 512 MB - On-board = 512 MB, DIMM0 = 0 MB CISCO2911/K9 platform with 524288 Kbytes of main memory Main memory is configured to 72/-1(On-board/DIMM0) bit mode with ECC enabled Readonly ROMMON initialized program load complete, entry point: 0x80803000, size: 0x1b340 IOS Image Load Test ___________________ Digitally Signed Development Software program load complete, entry point: 0x81000000, size: 0x40b6b74 Self decompressing the image : ############################################################################################################# -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2691036> or simply reply to this email. -- -- -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2691978> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699015> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699042> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699089> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2699640> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2704890> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2703353> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2708817> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2712882> or simply reply to this email. -- -- -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2713045> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2713062> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2713416> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2716531> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2734857> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2739248> or simply reply to this email.
	Sign in to vote. Flag Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. Top

Ken Romo Posts: 36 Join Date: 8/13/10 Recent Posts	RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Answer 11/20/10 7:34 AM as a reply to Radhika Miriyala. Mark as an Answer Submit Reply with Quote Quick Reply Radhika, I tried that and here is the message I got: C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>route add 10.62.64.0 mask 255.255.255.0 172.17.17.130 metric 1 The route addition failed: Either the interface index is wrong or the gateway does not lie on the same network as the interface. Check the IP address Table for the machine. Ken, You need to add the route to the PC you are trying to reach this from not in the ISR. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 12:24 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I added: ip route 10.62.64.0 255.255.255.255 GigabitEthernet0/0 to the ISR and I still can't ping the 172.17.17.0 255.255.248.0 network Ken Ken, Are you trying to ping some particular system in your network? What is the default gateway for that system? The issue you are having most like is the the Vlan 1 network is private to the this particular ISR and your other systems/switches are not aware of this Vlan1. So what I would do is add a route for this 10.62.64.0 network to point to your gige 0/0 on the ISR. Please try that out and let me know if you still have issues. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 8:38 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, As you mentioned I am continuing testing on the SRE-V until you get a fix for the IOS. I have installed and configured our application in a VM on the SRE however I am having trouble accessing an external network from the VM (running Windows 2003 server). I would like to access the 172.17.17.0 255.255.255.248 from my VM. Below are the settings from my VM and ISR/SRE, do I need to add a route on the ISR for this to happen? VM (I can ping the GigEth 0/0 from my VM) IP address ¿ 10.62.64.10 Subnet ¿ 255.255.255.0 Gateway 10.62.64.2 ISR interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip address 172.17.17.130 255.255.248.0 duplex auto speed auto interface SM1/0 ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/0 service-module ip address 172.17.17.129 255.255.248.0 !Application: SRE-V Running on SMV service-module ip default-gateway 172.17.17.130 service-module mgf ip address 10.62.64.1 255.255.255.0 service-module mgf ip default-gateway 10.62.64.2 ! interface SM1/1 description Internal switch interface connected to Service Module switchport mode trunk ! interface Vlan1 ip address 10.62.64.2 255.255.255.0 ! ! ip route 172.17.17.129 255.255.255.255 SM1/0 Ken, They are still looking into it. I will keep you posted on any new information. Can you continue with trying out SRE-v with out the PVDM in your setup? Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 9:26 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-
	Sign in to vote. Flag Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. Top

Radhika Miriyala Posts: 174 Join Date: 8/12/10 Recent Posts	RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Answer 11/20/10 7:34 AM as a reply to Ken Romo. Mark as an Answer Submit Reply with Quote Quick Reply What is the default gateway for your PC? What network is the PC in? I think the out put of route print from your PC might help. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 1:04 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I tried that and here is the message I got: C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>route add 10.62.64.0 mask 255.255.255.0 172.17.17.130 metric 1 The route addition failed: Either the interface index is wrong or the gateway does not lie on the same network as the interface. Check the IP address Table for the machine. Ken, You need to add the route to the PC you are trying to reach this from not in the ISR. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 12:24 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I added: ip route 10.62.64.0 255.255.255.255 GigabitEthernet0/0 to the ISR and I still can't ping the 172.17.17.0 255.255.248.0 network Ken Ken, Are you trying to ping some particular system in your network? What is the default gateway for that system? The issue you are having most like is the the Vlan 1 network is private to the this particular ISR and your other systems/switches are not aware of this Vlan1. So what I would do is add a route for this 10.62.64.0 network to point to your gige 0/0 on the ISR. Please try that out and let me know if you still have issues. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 8:38 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, As you mentioned I am continuing testing on the SRE-V until you get a fix for the IOS. I have installed and configured our application in a VM on the SRE however I am having trouble accessing an external network from the VM (running Windows 2003 server). I would like to access the 172.17.17.0 255.255.255.248 from my VM. Below are the settings from my VM and ISR/SRE, do I need to add a route on the ISR for this to happen? VM (I can ping the GigEth 0/0 from my VM) IP address ¿ 10.62.64.10 Subnet ¿ 255.255.255.0 Gateway 10.62.64.2 ISR interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip address 172.17.17.130 255.255.248.0 duplex auto speed auto interface SM1/0 ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/0 service-module ip address 172.17.17.129 255.255.248.0 !Application: SRE-V Running on SMV service-module ip default-gateway 172.17.17.130 service-module mgf ip address 10.62.64.1 255.255.255.0 service-module mgf ip default-gateway 10.62.64.2 ! interface SM1/1 description Internal switch interface connected to Service Module switchport mode trunk ! interface Vlan1 ip address 10.62.64.2 255.255.255.0 ! ! ip route 172.17.17.129 255.255.255.255 SM1/0 Ken, They are still looking into it. I will keep you posted on any new information. Can you continue with trying out SRE-v with out the PVDM in your setup? Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 9:26 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2739271> or simply reply to this email.
	Sign in to vote. Flag Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. Top

Ken Romo Posts: 36 Join Date: 8/13/10 Recent Posts	RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Answer 11/20/10 7:34 AM as a reply to Radhika Miriyala. Mark as an Answer Submit Reply with Quote Quick Reply Radhika, Here you go: IPV4 Route Table ============================================================================= Interface List 0x1 ............................. MS TCP Loopback interface 0x10003.. 00 0c 29 c6 16 0b ........ Intel (R) PRO/1000 MT NETWORK CONNECTION ============================================================================= ============================================================================= Active Rouytes: Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.62.64.2 10.62.64.10 10 10.62.64.0 255.255.255.0 10.62.64.10 10.62.64.10 10 10.62.64.10 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 10 10.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 10.62.64.10 10.62.64.10 10 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 10.62.64.10 10.62.64.10 10 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 10.62.64.10 10.62.64.10 1 Default Gateway: 10.62.64.2 ============================================================================= Persistent Routes: None What is the default gateway for your PC? What network is the PC in? I think the out put of route print from your PC might help. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 1:04 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I tried that and here is the message I got: C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>route add 10.62.64.0 mask 255.255.255.0 172.17.17.130 metric 1 The route addition failed: Either the interface index is wrong or the gateway does not lie on the same network as the interface. Check the IP address Table for the machine. Ken, You need to add the route to the PC you are trying to reach this from not in the ISR. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 12:24 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I added: ip route 10.62.64.0 255.255.255.255 GigabitEthernet0/0 to the ISR and I still can't ping the 172.17.17.0 255.255.248.0 network Ken Ken, Are you trying to ping some particular system in your network? What is the default gateway for that system? The issue you are having most like is the the Vlan 1 network is private to the this particular ISR and your other systems/switches are not aware of this Vlan1. So what I would do is add a route for this 10.62.64.0 network to point to your gige 0/0 on the ISR. Please try that out and let me know if you still have issues. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 8:38 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, As you mentioned I am continuing testing on the SRE-V until you get a fix for the IOS. I have installed and configured our application in a VM on the SRE however I am having trouble accessing an external network from the VM (running Windows 2003 server). I would like to access the 172.17.17.0 255.255.255.248 from my VM. Below are the settings from my VM and ISR/SRE, do I need to add a route on the ISR for this to happen? VM (I can ping the GigEth 0/0 from my VM) IP address ¿ 10.62.64.10 Subnet ¿ 255.255.255.0 Gateway 10.62.64.2 ISR interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip address 172.17.17.130 255.255.248.0 duplex auto speed auto interface SM1/0 ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/0 service-module ip address 172.17.17.129 255.255.248.0 !Application: SRE-V Running on SMV service-module ip default-gateway 172.17.17.130 service-module mgf ip address 10.62.64.1 255.255.255.0 service-module mgf ip default-gateway 10.62.64.2 ! interface SM1/1 description Internal switch interface connected to Service Module switchport mode trunk ! interface Vlan1 ip address 10.62.64.2 255.255.255.0 ! ! ip route 172.17.17.129 255.255.255.255 SM1/0 Ken, They are still looking into it. I will keep you posted on any new information. Can you continue with trying out SRE-v with out the PVDM in your setup? Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 9:26 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2739271> or simply reply to this email.
	Sign in to vote. Flag Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. Top

Radhika Miriyala Posts: 174 Join Date: 8/12/10 Recent Posts	RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Answer 11/20/10 7:34 AM as a reply to Ken Romo. Mark as an Answer Submit Reply with Quote Quick Reply Ken, It looks like you you are trying to add the router to the VM (from the Ip addresses you gave for the VM below). I was suggesting adding the route to the system which is in 172.17. networks and is trying to reach this VM. If my explanation is not clear we can try and have a webex session on Monday/Tuesday next week and I can help you with it. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 2:25 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Here you go: IPV4 Route Table ============================================================================= Interface List 0x1 ............................. MS TCP Loopback interface 0x10003.. 00 0c 29 c6 16 0b ........ Intel (R) PRO/1000 MT NETWORK CONNECTION ============================================================================= ============================================================================= Active Rouytes: Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.62.64.2 10.62.64.10 10 10.62.64.0 255.255.255.0 10.62.64.10 10.62.64.10 10 10.62.64.10 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 10 10.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 10.62.64.10 10.62.64.10 10 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 10.62.64.10 10.62.64.10 10 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 10.62.64.10 10.62.64.10 1 Default Gateway: 10.62.64.2 ============================================================================= Persistent Routes: None What is the default gateway for your PC? What network is the PC in? I think the out put of route print from your PC might help. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 1:04 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I tried that and here is the message I got: C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>route add 10.62.64.0 mask 255.255.255.0 172.17.17.130 metric 1 The route addition failed: Either the interface index is wrong or the gateway does not lie on the same network as the interface. Check the IP address Table for the machine. Ken, You need to add the route to the PC you are trying to reach this from not in the ISR. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 12:24 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I added: ip route 10.62.64.0 255.255.255.255 GigabitEthernet0/0 to the ISR and I still can't ping the 172.17.17.0 255.255.248.0 network Ken Ken, Are you trying to ping some particular system in your network? What is the default gateway for that system? The issue you are having most like is the the Vlan 1 network is private to the this particular ISR and your other systems/switches are not aware of this Vlan1. So what I would do is add a route for this 10.62.64.0 network to point to your gige 0/0 on the ISR. Please try that out and let me know if you still have issues. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 8:38 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, As you mentioned I am continuing testing on the SRE-V until you get a fix for the IOS. I have installed and configured our application in a VM on the SRE however I am having trouble accessing an external network from the VM (running Windows 2003 server). I would like to access the 172.17.17.0 255.255.255.248 from my VM. Below are the settings from my VM and ISR/SRE, do I need to add a route on the ISR for this to happen? VM (I can ping the GigEth 0/0 from my VM) IP address ¿ 10.62.64.10 Subnet ¿ 255.255.255.0 Gateway 10.62.64.2 ISR interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip address 172.17.17.130 255.255.248.0 duplex auto speed auto interface SM1/0 ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/0 service-module ip address 172.17.17.129 255.255.248.0 !Application: SRE-V Running on SMV service-module ip default-gateway 172.17.17.130 service-module mgf ip address 10.62.64.1 255.255.255.0 service-module mgf ip default-gateway 10.62.64.2 ! interface SM1/1 description Internal switch interface connected to Service Module switchport mode trunk ! interface Vlan1 ip address 10.62.64.2 255.255.255.0 ! ! ip route 172.17.17.129 255.255.255.255 SM1/0 Ken, They are still looking into it. I will keep you posted on any new information. Can you continue with trying out SRE-v with out the PVDM in your setup? Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 9:26 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2739271> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2739416> or simply reply to this email.
	Sign in to vote. Flag Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. Top

Ken Romo Posts: 36 Join Date: 8/13/10 Recent Posts	RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Answer 11/20/10 7:34 AM as a reply to Radhika Miriyala. Mark as an Answer Submit Reply with Quote Quick Reply Radhika, A webex would be great (today would be better for me), I have a meeting from 10:00-11:00 MST today but other than that I will make myself available to fit your schedule. Email: kromo@opentext.com Thank you again, Ken Romo Ken, It looks like you you are trying to add the router to the VM (from the Ip addresses you gave for the VM below). I was suggesting adding the route to the system which is in 172.17. networks and is trying to reach this VM. If my explanation is not clear we can try and have a webex session on Monday/Tuesday next week and I can help you with it. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 2:25 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Here you go: IPV4 Route Table ============================================================================= Interface List 0x1 ............................. MS TCP Loopback interface 0x10003.. 00 0c 29 c6 16 0b ........ Intel (R) PRO/1000 MT NETWORK CONNECTION ============================================================================= ============================================================================= Active Rouytes: Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.62.64.2 10.62.64.10 10 10.62.64.0 255.255.255.0 10.62.64.10 10.62.64.10 10 10.62.64.10 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 10 10.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 10.62.64.10 10.62.64.10 10 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 10.62.64.10 10.62.64.10 10 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 10.62.64.10 10.62.64.10 1 Default Gateway: 10.62.64.2 ============================================================================= Persistent Routes: None What is the default gateway for your PC? What network is the PC in? I think the out put of route print from your PC might help. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 1:04 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I tried that and here is the message I got: C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>route add 10.62.64.0 mask 255.255.255.0 172.17.17.130 metric 1 The route addition failed: Either the interface index is wrong or the gateway does not lie on the same network as the interface. Check the IP address Table for the machine. Ken, You need to add the route to the PC you are trying to reach this from not in the ISR. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 12:24 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I added: ip route 10.62.64.0 255.255.255.255 GigabitEthernet0/0 to the ISR and I still can't ping the 172.17.17.0 255.255.248.0 network Ken Ken, Are you trying to ping some particular system in your network? What is the default gateway for that system? The issue you are having most like is the the Vlan 1 network is private to the this particular ISR and your other systems/switches are not aware of this Vlan1. So what I would do is add a route for this 10.62.64.0 network to point to your gige 0/0 on the ISR. Please try that out and let me know if you still have issues. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 8:38 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, As you mentioned I am continuing testing on the SRE-V until you get a fix for the IOS. I have installed and configured our application in a VM on the SRE however I am having trouble accessing an external network from the VM (running Windows 2003 server). I would like to access the 172.17.17.0 255.255.255.248 from my VM. Below are the settings from my VM and ISR/SRE, do I need to add a route on the ISR for this to happen? VM (I can ping the GigEth 0/0 from my VM) IP address ¿ 10.62.64.10 Subnet ¿ 255.255.255.0 Gateway 10.62.64.2 ISR interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip address 172.17.17.130 255.255.248.0 duplex auto speed auto interface SM1/0 ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/0 service-module ip address 172.17.17.129 255.255.248.0 !Application: SRE-V Running on SMV service-module ip default-gateway 172.17.17.130 service-module mgf ip address 10.62.64.1 255.255.255.0 service-module mgf ip default-gateway 10.62.64.2 ! interface SM1/1 description Internal switch interface connected to Service Module switchport mode trunk ! interface Vlan1 ip address 10.62.64.2 255.255.255.0 ! ! ip route 172.17.17.129 255.255.255.255 SM1/0 Ken, They are still looking into it. I will keep you posted on any new information. Can you continue with trying out SRE-v with out the PVDM in your setup? Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 9:26 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2739271> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2739416> or simply reply to this email.
	Sign in to vote. Flag Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. Top

Radhika Miriyala Posts: 174 Join Date: 8/12/10 Recent Posts	RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Answer 11/20/10 7:34 AM as a reply to Ken Romo. Mark as an Answer Submit Reply with Quote Quick Reply Ken, I will schedule a webex for 1:00 Pm pst today Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 7:57 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, A webex would be great (today would be better for me), I have a meeting from 10:00-11:00 MST today but other than that I will make myself available to fit your schedule. Email: kromo@opentext.com Thank you again, Ken Romo Ken, It looks like you you are trying to add the router to the VM (from the Ip addresses you gave for the VM below). I was suggesting adding the route to the system which is in 172.17. networks and is trying to reach this VM. If my explanation is not clear we can try and have a webex session on Monday/Tuesday next week and I can help you with it. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 2:25 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, Here you go: IPV4 Route Table ============================================================================= Interface List 0x1 ............................. MS TCP Loopback interface 0x10003.. 00 0c 29 c6 16 0b ........ Intel (R) PRO/1000 MT NETWORK CONNECTION ============================================================================= ============================================================================= Active Rouytes: Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.62.64.2 10.62.64.10 10 10.62.64.0 255.255.255.0 10.62.64.10 10.62.64.10 10 10.62.64.10 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 10 10.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 10.62.64.10 10.62.64.10 10 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 10.62.64.10 10.62.64.10 10 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 10.62.64.10 10.62.64.10 1 Default Gateway: 10.62.64.2 ============================================================================= Persistent Routes: None What is the default gateway for your PC? What network is the PC in? I think the out put of route print from your PC might help. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 1:04 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I tried that and here is the message I got: C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>route add 10.62.64.0 mask 255.255.255.0 172.17.17.130 metric 1 The route addition failed: Either the interface index is wrong or the gateway does not lie on the same network as the interface. Check the IP address Table for the machine. Ken, You need to add the route to the PC you are trying to reach this from not in the ISR. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 12:24 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, I added: ip route 10.62.64.0 255.255.255.255 GigabitEthernet0/0 to the ISR and I still can't ping the 172.17.17.0 255.255.248.0 network Ken Ken, Are you trying to ping some particular system in your network? What is the default gateway for that system? The issue you are having most like is the the Vlan 1 network is private to the this particular ISR and your other systems/switches are not aware of this Vlan1. So what I would do is add a route for this 10.62.64.0 network to point to your gige 0/0 on the ISR. Please try that out and let me know if you still have issues. Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 8:38 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- Ken Romo has created a new message in the forum "SRE-V Beta Testing": -------------------------------------------------------------- Radhika, As you mentioned I am continuing testing on the SRE-V until you get a fix for the IOS. I have installed and configured our application in a VM on the SRE however I am having trouble accessing an external network from the VM (running Windows 2003 server). I would like to access the 172.17.17.0 255.255.255.248 from my VM. Below are the settings from my VM and ISR/SRE, do I need to add a route on the ISR for this to happen? VM (I can ping the GigEth 0/0 from my VM) IP address ¿ 10.62.64.10 Subnet ¿ 255.255.255.0 Gateway 10.62.64.2 ISR interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip address 172.17.17.130 255.255.248.0 duplex auto speed auto interface SM1/0 ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/0 service-module ip address 172.17.17.129 255.255.248.0 !Application: SRE-V Running on SMV service-module ip default-gateway 172.17.17.130 service-module mgf ip address 10.62.64.1 255.255.255.0 service-module mgf ip default-gateway 10.62.64.2 ! interface SM1/1 description Internal switch interface connected to Service Module switchport mode trunk ! interface Vlan1 ip address 10.62.64.2 255.255.255.0 ! ! ip route 172.17.17.129 255.255.255.255 SM1/0 Ken, They are still looking into it. I will keep you posted on any new information. Can you continue with trying out SRE-v with out the PVDM in your setup? Thanks, Radhika From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 9:26 AM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE-V Beta Testing: RE: New Message from Ken Romo in Service Ready Engine Virtualization - SRE- -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2739271> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2739416> or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: <http://developer.cisco.com/group/srev/forums/-/message_boards/message/2744674> or simply reply to this email.
	Sign in to vote. Flag Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. Top

Showing 61 - 73 of 73 results.

First Previous Next Last