Combination View Flat View Tree View
Threads [ Previous | Next ]
Does having extension mobility configured on your network change the CDRs that are output by UCM, or do the CDRs appear identical to calls not involving extension mobility?

I'm assuming you are not speaking of the actual handset mobility. If so, records are likely to appear the same as the rest of the calls from the location and will be hard to identify via the CDR- phone will likely register w/ new IP and use CSS, partitions, gateways, etc associated with that second location.
 
If you are speaking of user/extension mobility via login, you may try keying on the loginID fields.
 
If you are referring to call-flow mobility features like 'Follow-Me', etc, you may be able to use some redirect, onbehalf codes, etc as referenced here:
 
http://www.ciscosystems.net/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/service/8_0_1/cdrdef/cdradminguide.pdf

I am speaking of user/extension mobility where the users login to the phones.  We don't have it set up in my test lab and I want to make sure the CDRs won't present any surprises to my call accounting application.

Ah ok. Well other than location tracking I can't see it having much impact regarding content change in that regard. But then again, no idea what the software may be doing with the data. Do you mind if I ask what you are using? (Not lucky enough for it to be free by any chance would it?) lol

The software is called VeraSMART, and it's made by my company.  We're getting ready to undergo interoperability verification testing for certification and I'm running through the test plan to make sure we don't have any surprises next month when they actually do the testing.  As far as I know the software doesn't do anything with location from the CDR file, so that should be ok then.

Good idea, and best of luck with IVT :-)