Tuong Au | Hi Patrick,
Thanks for the update.
Thanks, Tom
From: Cisco Developer Community Forums <cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>> Reply-To: "cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>" <cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>> Date: Friday, March 1, 2013 12:04 PM To: "cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>" <cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>> Subject: New Message from Patrick Pless in Unified Computing System E-Series Servers (UCSE) - Technical Questions: RE: New Message from Tuong Au in Unified Computing System E-Series Servers
Patrick Pless has created a new message in the forum "Technical Questions": -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Tuong, Unfortunately this does not work for us. In this customer scenario, the CICM address must be in the same network as the Gig interface, so we cannot change it to a non-10.94.0.0 address. And we can’t assign another address to the UCSE2/0 interface in the same network.
I was able to make this work by bridging the UCSE2/0 interface together with the gig 0/2.751 interface and configuring the 10.94.0.1 IP on the BVI interface. I am now able to access the CIMC and was able to install ESX. This may be somewhat of a hack but it seems to work.
Thanks, Patrick
From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 2:42 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com> Subject: New Message from Tuong Au in Unified Computing System E-Series Servers (UCSE) - Technical Questions: Re: New Message from Daniel Miller in Unified Computing System E-Series Ser
Tuong Au has created a new message in the forum "Technical Questions": -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Patrick,
I also see the same issue with SM-SRE product so not sure if this configuration is supported in this manner. As a work around would below work? Remove 'ip unnumbered' config from ucse 2/0 and assign a static ip instead. G0/0.751 and UCSE 2/0 would still be in vrf L3. If you need to reach CIMC from outside of this router then add vrf route pointing to GigabitEthernet0/0.751 as the gateway.
c3925e-2003#show run int ucse 2/0 Building configuration...
Current configuration : 175 bytes ! interface ucse2/0 ip vrf forwarding L3 ip address 11.0.0.1 255.0.0.0 imc ip address 11.0.0.2 255.0.0.0 default-gateway 11.0.0.1 imc access-port shared-lom console end
c3925e-2003#show run int GigabitEthernet0/0.751 Building configuration...
Current configuration : 125 bytes ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0.751 encapsulation dot1Q 751 ip vrf forwarding L3 ip address 10.94.0.1 255.255.255.192 end
c3925e-2003#ping vrf L3 11.0.0.2 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 11.0.0.2, timeout is 2 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/2 ms c3925e-2003#show ip route vrf L3
Routing Table: L3 Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2 i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2 ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, H - NHRP, l - LISP a - application route + - replicated route, % - next hop override
Gateway of last resort is not set
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 10.94.0.0/26 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0.751 L 10.94.0.1/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0.751 11.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 11.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, ucse2/0 L 11.0.0.1/32 is directly connected, ucse2/0 c3925e-2003#
Thanks, Tom
From: Cisco Developer Community Forums <cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com><mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3cmailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>>> Reply-To: "cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com><mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com><mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3cmailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3e>" <cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com><mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3cmailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>>> Date: Thursday, February 28, 2013 2:03 PM To: "cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com><mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com><mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3cmailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3e>" <cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com><mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3cmailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>>> Subject: New Message from Daniel Miller in Unified Computing System E-Series Servers (UCSE) - Technical Questions: RE: UCS-E slot/0 interface in VRF ?
Daniel Miller has created a new message in the forum "Technical Questions": -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Patrick, Does it work if you use a different interface instead of ucse? Thanks, Daniel -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: or simply reply to this email. |