Developer Network

Forums

« Back to Technical Questions

Re: New Message from Patrick Pless in Unified Computing System E-Series Ser

Combination View

Patrick Pless Posts: 3 Join Date: 8/8/12 Recent Posts	UCS-E slot/0 interface in VRF ? Answer 2/28/13 8:21 PM Mark as an Answer Submit Reply with Quote Quick Reply I'm attempting to configure my CIMC access through the PCIe slot/0 backplane connection. The interface I'm pointing the unnumbered statement back to on the 3925 host device is a sub-interface in a VRF. According to the user guides, I've configured "shared lom console" and then attempted to add a route back to the CIMC through the "ucse slot/0" interface. Unfortunately, it seems you cannot specify the ucse slot/0 interface in a route statement when using a VRF. 3925(config)#ip route vrf L3 10.94.0.8 255.255.255.255 ucse2/0 % For VPN or topology routes, must specify a next hop IP address if not a point-to-point interface And you can't point the route to the sub-interface IP address... RIAB-3925(config)#ip route vrf L3 10.94.0.8 255.255.255.255 10.94.0.1 %Invalid next hop address (it's this router) I configured using the external "M" management port and have the traffic loop outside of the UCS-E, through the rest of my L2 topology, and back to the sub-interface on the 3925, but this is less than ideal since it burns a port on the L2 switch the M port is connected to (customer wants to purchase the smallest L2 switch required, so this is a problem). Is this a limitation of the code at this time or is there another method to configure this? Thanks, Patrick IOS Config snippit below: interface ucse2/0 ip vrf forwarding L3 ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/2.751 imc ip address 10.94.0.8 255.255.255.192 default-gateway 10.94.0.1 imc access-port shared-lom console ! interface ucse2/1 description Internal switch interface connected to Service Module switchport mode trunk ip vrf forwarding L3 no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet0/2.751 encapsulation dot1Q 751 ip vrf forwarding L3 ip address 10.94.0.1 255.255.255.192 end
	Sign in to vote. Flag Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. Top

Daniel Miller Posts: 7 Join Date: 12/21/10 Recent Posts	RE: UCS-E slot/0 interface in VRF ? Answer 2/28/13 10:03 PM as a reply to Patrick Pless. Mark as an Answer Submit Reply with Quote Quick Reply Hi Patrick, Does it work if you use a different interface instead of ucse? Thanks, Daniel
	Sign in to vote. Flag Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. Top

Tuong Au Posts: 9 Join Date: 5/12/11 Recent Posts	Re: New Message from Daniel Miller in Unified Computing System E-Series Ser Answer 3/1/13 7:42 PM as a reply to Daniel Miller. Mark as an Answer Submit Reply with Quote Quick Reply Hi Patrick, I also see the same issue with SM-SRE product so not sure if this configuration is supported in this manner. As a work around would below work? Remove 'ip unnumbered' config from ucse 2/0 and assign a static ip instead. G0/0.751 and UCSE 2/0 would still be in vrf L3. If you need to reach CIMC from outside of this router then add vrf route pointing to GigabitEthernet0/0.751 as the gateway. c3925e-2003#show run int ucse 2/0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 175 bytes ! interface ucse2/0 ip vrf forwarding L3 ip address 11.0.0.1 255.0.0.0 imc ip address 11.0.0.2 255.0.0.0 default-gateway 11.0.0.1 imc access-port shared-lom console end c3925e-2003#show run int GigabitEthernet0/0.751 Building configuration... Current configuration : 125 bytes ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0.751 encapsulation dot1Q 751 ip vrf forwarding L3 ip address 10.94.0.1 255.255.255.192 end c3925e-2003#ping vrf L3 11.0.0.2 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 11.0.0.2, timeout is 2 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/2 ms c3925e-2003#show ip route vrf L3 Routing Table: L3 Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2 i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2 ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, H - NHRP, l - LISP a - application route + - replicated route, % - next hop override Gateway of last resort is not set 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 10.94.0.0/26 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0.751 L 10.94.0.1/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0.751 11.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 11.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, ucse2/0 L 11.0.0.1/32 is directly connected, ucse2/0 c3925e-2003# Thanks, Tom From: Cisco Developer Community Forums <cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>> Reply-To: "cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>" <cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>> Date: Thursday, February 28, 2013 2:03 PM To: "cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>" <cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>> Subject: New Message from Daniel Miller in Unified Computing System E-Series Servers (UCSE) - Technical Questions: RE: UCS-E slot/0 interface in VRF ? Daniel Miller has created a new message in the forum "Technical Questions": -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Patrick, Does it work if you use a different interface instead of ucse? Thanks, Daniel -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: or simply reply to this email.
	Sign in to vote. Flag Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. Top

Patrick Pless Posts: 3 Join Date: 8/8/12 Recent Posts	RE: New Message from Tuong Au in Unified Computing System E-Series Servers Answer 3/1/13 8:04 PM as a reply to Tuong Au. Mark as an Answer Submit Reply with Quote Quick Reply Hi Tuong, Unfortunately this does not work for us. In this customer scenario, the CICM address must be in the same network as the Gig interface, so we cannot change it to a non-10.94.0.0 address. And we can’t assign another address to the UCSE2/0 interface in the same network. I was able to make this work by bridging the UCSE2/0 interface together with the gig 0/2.751 interface and configuring the 10.94.0.1 IP on the BVI interface. I am now able to access the CIMC and was able to install ESX. This may be somewhat of a hack but it seems to work. Thanks, Patrick From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 2:42 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com Subject: New Message from Tuong Au in Unified Computing System E-Series Servers (UCSE) - Technical Questions: Re: New Message from Daniel Miller in Unified Computing System E-Series Ser Tuong Au has created a new message in the forum "Technical Questions": -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Patrick, I also see the same issue with SM-SRE product so not sure if this configuration is supported in this manner. As a work around would below work? Remove 'ip unnumbered' config from ucse 2/0 and assign a static ip instead. G0/0.751 and UCSE 2/0 would still be in vrf L3. If you need to reach CIMC from outside of this router then add vrf route pointing to GigabitEthernet0/0.751 as the gateway. c3925e-2003#show run int ucse 2/0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 175 bytes ! interface ucse2/0 ip vrf forwarding L3 ip address 11.0.0.1 255.0.0.0 imc ip address 11.0.0.2 255.0.0.0 default-gateway 11.0.0.1 imc access-port shared-lom console end c3925e-2003#show run int GigabitEthernet0/0.751 Building configuration... Current configuration : 125 bytes ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0.751 encapsulation dot1Q 751 ip vrf forwarding L3 ip address 10.94.0.1 255.255.255.192 end c3925e-2003#ping vrf L3 11.0.0.2 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 11.0.0.2, timeout is 2 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/2 ms c3925e-2003#show ip route vrf L3 Routing Table: L3 Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2 i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2 ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, H - NHRP, l - LISP a - application route + - replicated route, % - next hop override Gateway of last resort is not set 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 10.94.0.0/26 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0.751 L 10.94.0.1/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0.751 11.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 11.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, ucse2/0 L 11.0.0.1/32 is directly connected, ucse2/0 c3925e-2003# Thanks, Tom From: Cisco Developer Community Forums <cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3cmailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>>> Reply-To: "cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com><mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3cmailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3e>" <cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3cmailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>>> Date: Thursday, February 28, 2013 2:03 PM To: "cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com><mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3cmailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3e>" <cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3cmailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>>> Subject: New Message from Daniel Miller in Unified Computing System E-Series Servers (UCSE) - Technical Questions: RE: UCS-E slot/0 interface in VRF ? Daniel Miller has created a new message in the forum "Technical Questions": -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Patrick, Does it work if you use a different interface instead of ucse? Thanks, Daniel -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: or simply reply to this email.
	Sign in to vote. Flag Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. Top

Tuong Au Posts: 9 Join Date: 5/12/11 Recent Posts	Re: New Message from Patrick Pless in Unified Computing System E-Series Ser Answer 3/1/13 8:12 PM as a reply to Patrick Pless. Mark as an Answer Submit Reply with Quote Quick Reply Hi Patrick, Thanks for the update. Thanks, Tom From: Cisco Developer Community Forums <cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>> Reply-To: "cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>" <cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>> Date: Friday, March 1, 2013 12:04 PM To: "cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>" <cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>> Subject: New Message from Patrick Pless in Unified Computing System E-Series Servers (UCSE) - Technical Questions: RE: New Message from Tuong Au in Unified Computing System E-Series Servers Patrick Pless has created a new message in the forum "Technical Questions": -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Tuong, Unfortunately this does not work for us. In this customer scenario, the CICM address must be in the same network as the Gig interface, so we cannot change it to a non-10.94.0.0 address. And we can’t assign another address to the UCSE2/0 interface in the same network. I was able to make this work by bridging the UCSE2/0 interface together with the gig 0/2.751 interface and configuring the 10.94.0.1 IP on the BVI interface. I am now able to access the CIMC and was able to install ESX. This may be somewhat of a hack but it seems to work. Thanks, Patrick From: Cisco Developer Community Forums [mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 2:42 PM To: cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com> Subject: New Message from Tuong Au in Unified Computing System E-Series Servers (UCSE) - Technical Questions: Re: New Message from Daniel Miller in Unified Computing System E-Series Ser Tuong Au has created a new message in the forum "Technical Questions": -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Patrick, I also see the same issue with SM-SRE product so not sure if this configuration is supported in this manner. As a work around would below work? Remove 'ip unnumbered' config from ucse 2/0 and assign a static ip instead. G0/0.751 and UCSE 2/0 would still be in vrf L3. If you need to reach CIMC from outside of this router then add vrf route pointing to GigabitEthernet0/0.751 as the gateway. c3925e-2003#show run int ucse 2/0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 175 bytes ! interface ucse2/0 ip vrf forwarding L3 ip address 11.0.0.1 255.0.0.0 imc ip address 11.0.0.2 255.0.0.0 default-gateway 11.0.0.1 imc access-port shared-lom console end c3925e-2003#show run int GigabitEthernet0/0.751 Building configuration... Current configuration : 125 bytes ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0.751 encapsulation dot1Q 751 ip vrf forwarding L3 ip address 10.94.0.1 255.255.255.192 end c3925e-2003#ping vrf L3 11.0.0.2 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 11.0.0.2, timeout is 2 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/2 ms c3925e-2003#show ip route vrf L3 Routing Table: L3 Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2 i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2 ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, H - NHRP, l - LISP a - application route + - replicated route, % - next hop override Gateway of last resort is not set 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 10.94.0.0/26 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0.751 L 10.94.0.1/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0.751 11.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 11.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, ucse2/0 L 11.0.0.1/32 is directly connected, ucse2/0 c3925e-2003# Thanks, Tom From: Cisco Developer Community Forums <cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com><mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3cmailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>>> Reply-To: "cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com><mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com><mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3cmailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3e>" <cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com><mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3cmailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>>> Date: Thursday, February 28, 2013 2:03 PM To: "cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com><mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com><mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3cmailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3e>" <cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com><mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com<mailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com%3cmailto:cdicuser@developer.cisco.com>>> Subject: New Message from Daniel Miller in Unified Computing System E-Series Servers (UCSE) - Technical Questions: RE: UCS-E slot/0 interface in VRF ? Daniel Miller has created a new message in the forum "Technical Questions": -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Patrick, Does it work if you use a different interface instead of ucse? Thanks, Daniel -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: or simply reply to this email. -- To respond to this post, please click the following link: or simply reply to this email.
	Sign in to vote. Flag Please sign in to flag this as inappropriate. Top